@LieutenantSOT o h r e a l l y ?, Also Nice, I will begin a new plane that's abit faster and maybe abit more f-86 like

@Planebuilder2123 yeah lol 😂
Aleph Null is the smallest value of infinity, recognizing every possible cardinal number that we don't even know yet. So if you post that many planes, I will give you rhe same number of upvotes

Yeah, you're entirely right (no offense, of course). The plane looks meh, but I made this grading chart as a means of whether you can go towards specifications, and you did it! The grade was mostly that, which is now making me realize my grading scale is poorly reflecting this challenge. I think I'm going to make a new one that's more streamlined with like 3 sections that makes it easier for me to grade, and more accurate to take into account the specifications, but also make it harder/easier to get in the ranks and make the numbers more different from each other

@LieutenantSOT oh I thought aleph null was some nonsense, well time to get to building

@LieutenantSOT ey you didn't say why, but I would say it looks ugly, because it does. The design was a failed one and way out of my zone if ya couldn't tell, if allowed I might completely remake this since I didn't plan anything out beforehand and the mid high engines where a rushjob since it kept pitching up, the only reason it would win in a dogfight between the others is mostly because of its weapons, nothing else, it would just one shot the others on the first strafe, but and that's only if it's head on lol, if one of the other submissions move slightly up this jet is doomed lol, anyways if ya allow a redesign I might use miniguns but disguise and configure them as 20 mms, only because they fire at the same time

Alrighty mate, here's the time for your grade!
As with everyone else, these are subject to change, and I will say why I graded it what way after the score
.
Speed: 7/10
Maneuver: 9/10
Realism: 13/15
Requirements: 25/30
Carrier: 15/15
Tactical: 10/10
Looks: 3.5/5
Opinion: 4/5
Total: 86.5/100

@LieutenantSOT