Profile image

1945-1950 Naval Aviation Challenge (Closed)

25.5k Mustang51  5.0 years ago

1945-50 Naval aviation challenge

TLDR
Build an aircraft in use from 1945-1950 for any navy. Can be fictional or replica. You get upvotes depending on how many criteria points you get as well as your overall ranking.

The top three builds are:

1. SimplyPlain’s Martin Mauler with 64 points

2. Tang0five’s B’BURN B.46 “Firebrand” TF Mk.5 with 63 points

3. RamboJutter’s RJ SeaCommander F2 with 62 points

The challenge is now closed and the results are on a forum post

Welcome to the 1945-1950 Naval Aviation Challenge! This is my first challenge so I hope you all enjoy it.

The goal is to make a naval aircraft which can take off and land on a ship or water. This means that amphibious aircraft, flying boats, and helicopters are also allowed. However, the aircraft should look and perform as if they were in naval service during the years 1945 until 1950.

To take part in this challenge, you must have your build be a successor. Your build may not have fire and forget air to air missiles (so only guardians!) but is allowed to have guided torpedos and bombs. Mods are not allowed but XML modifications are allowed and encouraged!

Your uploads can be either real or fictional, but the fictional aircraft should look like it was an aircraft that would have been used during this time. If the aircraft is a replica, it needs to be one that was used by a naval power during the years 1945-1950. It is also possible to modify real aircraft into naval versions which can take off and land on an aircraft carrier. Players are allowed to create three entries. The first of these must be an original creation but the second and third can be re-uploads of previous posts you have made (it has to have been posted by you!)

There are several criteria that will be looked at and these are:
1. Design: 20 points (does it look like a realistic design from the era? Does it look like it would be used by a navy from that time period? If the build is a replica, does it look like the original aircraft?)
2. Functionality: 10 points (does your plane function the way a naval plane of the time would such as having folding wings, the ability to connect to a catapult, takeoff and land on an aircraft carrier with ease)
3. Performance: 15 points (is your plane easy to control, Is it too manoeuvrable? Not manoeuvrable enough? Is it too fast or slow? Does it perform the way an aircraft from the time period would perform?)
4. Build quality: 15 points (is the aircraft detailed? Does it use simple stock or custom wings, landing gear, cockpit etc.? How smooth is the overall design?)
5. Paint scheme: 5 points (does it look good? Did aircraft in use at the time have similar paint jobs? Did you add numbers, art, or insignias?)
6. Personal opinion: 5 points (did I enjoy how it flew or looked?)

This means you can achieve a total of 70 points.

1st place: 20 upvotes
2nd place: 15 upvotes
3rd place: 10 upvotes

This challenge is also going to work a little different than others I have seen on here. For every ten points your aircraft gets, you will receive one upvote. This counts for the first, second, and third place too.

This means that the highest possible score is 27 upvotes!

I will upvote all of your entries as a thank you for participating. I will also post your scores in a comment on your upload and in a separate forum post after I have finished looking at all the entries.

The deadline for this challenge will be 23:59 (ECT) 7 December 2020.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask in the comments or in an unlisted version of your post.

Good luck everyone and have fun!

link to plane in this post: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/4y6hnm/Comet-US-NAVY

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Successors 80 airplane(s) +8482 bonus
  • Created On iOS
  • Wingspan 114.8ft (35.0m)
  • Length 46.1ft (14.0m)
  • Height 82.0ft (25.0m)
  • Empty Weight 16,624lbs (7,540kg)
  • Loaded Weight 39,667lbs (17,992kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 0.339
  • Wing Loading 124.5lbs/ft2 (608.0kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 318.5ft2 (29.6m2)
  • Drag Points 857450

Parts

  • Number of Parts 374
  • Control Surfaces 5
  • Performance Cost 946
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    25.5k Mustang51

    The challenge is now closed. I want to thank everyone who participated as this challenge was a lot of fun to watch grow. I have already almost finished marking all the planes and they were incredibly fun to fly and test out. I will post the scores individually on your own entries and then on a forum post too

    Pinned 4.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    His “Martin” mauler is potentially dangerous

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    It’s a naval strike fighter. Could be fitted with bombs or rockets, but was seen most with a torpedo.
    @TheTwoanie2000

    +1 3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    I dont agree with the second place. The Blackburn firebrand was a torpedo bomber not a fighter. THERE IS NO TORPEDO

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.5k Mustang51

    @JOEMAMA07 no problem buddy and good luck!

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    5,874 maggiebrandy

    Thx for the help @Mustang51 :D

    +1 4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.5k Mustang51

    @AircraftoftheRedStar thank you!

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    Awesome! Good luck on the final ones!
    @Mustang51

    +1 4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.5k Mustang51

    @SovietBun not yet

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Mustang51 is this closed?

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.5k Mustang51

    @FlyingHueman it’s CET so Amsterdam time

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    13.7k FlyingHueman

    @Mustang51 Most excellent! Mind if I ask you what your timezone is again? I don't expect to take that long, but who knows, lel

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.5k Mustang51

    @FlyingHueman you have until it ends so you still have a little time left

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    13.7k FlyingHueman

    @Mustang51 Just to clear a doubt up, we've got until January 7 starts or until it ends? I ask because I'm making a third build and now that I fixed some of its problems I need to touch it up and write a description, lol. Not that it'd be a problem if I can't get it finished in time, two submissions is already a lot and frankly more than I was expecting to do.

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.5k Mustang51

    @ND40X okay cheers!

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    23.4k FeatherWing

    @Mustang51
    You will see...
    Also, I will tag you on these things :3

    +1 4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.5k Mustang51

    @ND40X those sound like very cool builds! Let me know when they are up. Also for the challenge too. What type is it going to be?

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    23.4k FeatherWing

    @Mustang51
    I'm also going to make another challenge, so look out for that

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    23.4k FeatherWing

    @Mustang51
    Then I want to make a General Aviation, personal transport (single seat) aircraft that has a single jet engine

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    23.4k FeatherWing

    @Mustang51
    I currently have a 3-engined (my first one) bomber with a rotary bomb bay and rocket boosters. It will be called: 'The Silver Phantom'

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.5k Mustang51

    @ND40X well thanks for that buddy! Do you have any aircraft in the works?

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    23.4k FeatherWing

    @Mustang51
    Same here XD

    +2 4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.5k Mustang51

    @ND40X in terms of what I was expecting? I’d give it 10/10 because it did exponentially better than I thought it would hahaha

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    23.4k FeatherWing

    @Mustang51
    Ends tomorrow, huh?
    out of 10, what would you rate the successfulness of this challenge?

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    10.6k Trijetz

    here's mine! https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/403IxJ/Mitsubishi-A6M2-N-Rufe-France

    +1 4.8 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments