Mcdonnell Douglas F-4E Phantom II
This is the first time I've ever done leading edge slats. So cut me some slack, they may be a little rough!
Brief History
The McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II is a tandem two-seat, twin-engine, all-weather, long-range supersonic jet interceptor and fighter-bomber originally developed for the United States Navy by McDonnell Aircraft. It first entered service in 1961 with the Navy.
Armament
2x AIM9E Missiles
1x 20mm M-61 "Vulcan"
Controls
1=Nav Lights
2=Arresting Hook
3=Wings Folding
4=Airbrakes
5=Drag Chute
6=Jettison fuel tanks
G=LandingGear
VTOL=Flaps
I hope you guys enjoy this build! The only thing I forgot to do was to make the missile launch button say AIM9E. But that's not a big deal I don't guess. And it's my submission to the challenge but I don't expect to win, just for fun as always!
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Predecessor COLD WAR Challenge [CLOSED]
- Successors 2 airplane(s) +21 bonus
- Created On iOS
- Wingspan 38.6ft (11.8m)
- Length 63.0ft (19.2m)
- Height 17.6ft (5.4m)
- Empty Weight 28,933lbs (13,123kg)
- Loaded Weight 64,092lbs (29,071kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 1.612
- Wing Loading 82.7lbs/ft2 (403.8kg/m2)
- Wing Area 775.0ft2 (72.0m2)
- Drag Points 6768
Parts
- Number of Parts 511
- Control Surfaces 3
- Performance Cost 2,051
To all the mods: All tags were requested from a previous teaser post.
Lol thanks @DarthAbhinav
I can't believe I didn't upvote this pog build.
@Hedero np!
Thank you so much! @MAHADI
Impressive work on the details!
RATING
Looks : 9.25/10 pts.
Performance : 9/10 pts.
Details : 9.5/10 pts.
Weaponry : 9.1/10 pts.
Functionality : 9.45/10 pts.
Description :8.95/10 pts.
Bonus : 9.25/10 pts. (Details)
OVERALL RATING : 9.21/10
@DieDieTheLoaf
god dammit the autocorrect
lol ok @DieDieTheLoaf
When did I say he had mouth problems? Maybe auto correct idk@Skylerthedrawer
Hmm idk@Skylerthedrawer
Oh he said so @Hedero
No I don't think so?@Skylerthedrawer
Your brothers mouth? @Hedero
Alright I managed to reach a top speed of about 720-723 mph at sea level and I'm happy with that so thanks for the help!@edensk
Well our cat did have an accident but I don't know about my mouth@Skylerthedrawer
or was that your cat @Hedero
My mouth problems?@Skylerthedrawer
Sorry about your cat and your mouth problems i have mouth problems too
@Hedero 905 mph at sea level, minimum fuel load and clean, adjust the drag for that
Should I mess around with the engines maximum? It's only getting about 300mph at level flight. And of course it needs 920 something mph realistically. I did realistic weight and the calculations for the engine multiplier thrust but it's still not getting that top speed.@edensk
Yeah I was having some issues with the tracking while testing. I wasn't sure why they would fly like they do but there's not much I can do about it :/@DanDaFreakinMan
Looks great, flies alright, the missiles are a bit of an idiot though
I wouldn't exactly advise anyone to void their stomach contents onto this recently polished airplane but if you did I would just hire someone to spray it off with a pressure washer and re-polish it so no biggie.@FusionFire
Thanks for the help dude. And funny enough I was searching yt to see a landing gear retract test on the f100 and I found your video. Your f-100 from what I can see looks absolutely beautiful. All I know is that the landing gear is driving me nuts but I just have to take my time on it.@edensk