Profile image

AF SR-X Carrier Launch

50.4k Stingray  9.4 years ago
119 downloads
No Tags

Sea Launch for Very Fast SR-X recon test plane. Just for fun! LAUNCH: Full throttle, get some speed. Pitch hard up & ACT = 1 Release. Wheels Up, you should miss the water. (This may take more than one attempt). High maneuverability, 2,000 mph at 60,000 feet.

General Characteristics

  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 44.0ft (13.4m)
  • Length 140.3ft (42.8m)
  • Height 32.5ft (9.9m)
  • Empty Weight 26,916lbs (12,209kg)
  • Loaded Weight 68,169lbs (30,920kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 1.12
  • Wing Loading 9.8lbs/ft2 (47.9kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 6,946.3ft2 (645.3m2)
  • Drag Points 21886

Parts

  • Number of Parts 555
  • Control Surfaces 7
  • Performance Cost 1,584
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    50.4k Stingray
    Thanks @planesnthings
    9.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.7k Austinowen
    I prefer not use the decrative mods because if they do t really help my plane I don't want'em. Beside the only mods I use are fuel,wings,& engines! But Walrus mods have helped a lot of builders so his stuff will always be needed
    9.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    50.4k Stingray
    I get your drift. The basic block limitations need improvement, some of my modded planes may not work in future releases, already the Walrus mods are ornamental, I prefer not to use them in general. @Austinowen
    9.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.7k Austinowen
    Well I'd say keep using them unless A: You've figured out how to make your own mods, B: wait for the devs to make more parts, and C: have walrus & other kissers make/diversify the customization of their mods and make them more unquie ones
    9.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    50.4k Stingray
    Q: means we should not use @walrusaircraft mods that look cool -- but may be exceeded by our own mods? (I don't have the knowledge or sw/hw to do the Walrus mods, so I'm glad he provides them). --? @Austinowen
    9.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.7k Austinowen
    Well we would be working less hard at building if all we did was make good flying plane that didn't look cool or that people don't like!
    9.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    50.4k Stingray
    @Austinowen you mean the propeller? Yep, the Walrus prop failed to mirror, it's not usefull at all for propulsion - just decorative. The plane, on the other hand, took several hours to achieve STOL from a carrier.
    9.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    50.4k Stingray
    Thanks @jacobhardy64 @Austinowen
    9.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.7k Austinowen
    Great setup ,but your missing a blade bud!!
    9.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.2k JacobHardy64
    Downloaded. She's fun
    9.4 years ago