Old parts!!!
3,616 Kya
7.0 years ago
No Tags
Just a syb-assembly pack for people. Includes: old large prop, old small prop, old nose cone and the beloved dummy
Specifications
Spotlights
- PlaneFlightX 5.9 years ago
- PickyPlanes 7.0 years ago
- hopotumon 7.0 years ago
- FASTFLIGHT 7.0 years ago
- Vercynis 6.7 years ago
- Texasfam04 7.0 years ago
- FuzzyAircraftProductions 5.8 years ago
General Characteristics
- Successors 1 airplane(s) +14 bonus
- Created On iOS
- Wingspan 14.8ft (4.5m)
- Length 6.6ft (2.0m)
- Height 5.4ft (1.7m)
- Empty Weight 1,977lbs (896kg)
- Loaded Weight 1,977lbs (896kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 1.543
- Wing Loading 439,839.3lbs/ft2 (2,147,483.6kg/m2)
- Wing Area 0.0ft2 (0.0m2)
- Drag Points 2904
Parts
- Number of Parts 19
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 38
There’s also another one called NoseCone-2 but it looks exactly like NoseCone3 except for it is more detailed/higher quality. All you need to do is open the xml editor and change the part id to “NoseCone-2”.
No, just the first 3, including me. It’s not against the rules, it just won’t work. @Logotrax
Wait so does that mean only the first three got tagged, or does it mean everyone got tagged but I broke the rules? @Awsomur
🤔@Logotrax
I don’t know, but you can only tag 3 people in a comment. @Logotrax
Why is this becoming like a conspiracy theory???
@ACMECo1940 @Awsomur @Pilotmario @FASTFLIGHT @PorkyClown3 @RailfanEthan @hopotumon @SeanTurbineModifier @destroyerP @Texasfam04
Mm@destroyerP
Good point, they are tanker trucks. @Pilotmario
The trucks IMO are more likely to be filled with munitions, given what happens when they are shot at.
In the aforementioned instances, the targets are the vehicles, not the crew or passengers. In combat, it is certainly accepted to shoot at enemy vehicles. However, targeting the crew as they attempt to leave their stricken vehicle is an unspoken taboo.
By eliminating explicit references that the vehicles are manned, they could maintain that the targets are very much non-human. @Awsomur
Yup Jundroo can’t stop us using it, and never will! @Awsomur
And then some ignorant idiot could sue Jundroo for “making” a 9/11 replica, even though a user had made it. So it was best to just “remove” the test dummy.
.
But no one can defeat the dummy!
@PorkyClown3
Fair enough @PorkyClown3
So true ! @Awsomur
@FASTFLIGHT they were doing stuff like 9/11
I love how Jundroo thought the test dummies were making the game too violent when they then added:
1. A mission where you destroy a convoy of refugees escaping a tyrannical government.
2. Several missions involving straight-up warefare.
3. A mission where you are perilously evading merciless S.A.M missiles.
4. And really just the sheer terror of a plane crash, especially if the crash involves and airliner.
.
So yeah, Jundroo was really going for the child friendly theme here eh?
It still shouldn’t have been removed though @RailfanEthan
@FASTFLIGHT too many people used it for torture devices
@destroyerP nose cone was replaced with the resizeable one
@Texasfam04 lightweight and a lot of acceleration
love the oldest
Why did they remove the dummy?
Oh... but why is the nose cone remove too? @ACMECo1940
They are super overpowered and they are really stong@Texasfam04
Yea
thank you. btw, do you have any idea why they dont allow these engines in the races?