Profile image

[M-WAR II] Type-82 UCV Infantry Fighting Vehicle

90.9k Monarchii  one month ago

the thumbnail is a bit less drunk now, still as... questionable looking as ever.


WEEK!! POST!! CHIIIII!!!!!!!!!

WEEKEEENDIIINN POOOOOST OFFFF CHIIEEH!! :3333

anyway quick simple cat, not much thought given.

a bit large for what it is, but that's because it mounts a sizable 4.7cm cannon.. cause I want it to..? ah who cares, anyway!

it's replicated from a blueprint patent of US thingy that I got, and I don't actually know what it is beside it being an Armoured Car mounting a 20-30mm cannon(I know I enlarged it to like 4.7cm I KNOW ITS BIG) so someone tell me lmfao

anyway per ushal-ustal, enjoy my cat, tooos!!! :333


the Type-82 is an Infantry Fighting Vehicle designed and developed in the Monarchii in the 80s.

built by the Khorosya Armour Plant to enter the Urban Combat Vehicle(UCV) Initiative, Proyekt ICA.1182-2 was one of the entries of the competition.

it finally entered service in 1984 with the Monarchii Royal Army as the Type-82 UCV and is a mainstay of any Monarchii Urban Combat Task Force(UCTF) up until it's partial replacement with the more modern Type-18.

thousands of Type-82 were produced for the Monarchii and their allies, and many also ended up as armour stockpiles after the Great Crash Incident.

the Insignia belongs to one of the Battalion Tactical Group of the Monarchii Socialist Liberation Army, which was painted on after it was acquired in Battle of [NAME] by MSLA Forces.

  • |[ lowr ]|

|[ Controls ]|

  • Pitch : Forward/Backward
  • Roll : Turn Left/Right
  • AG1 : Headlights
  • Turret : Autoaimed; use VTOL & Trim to adjust
  • VTOL : Adjust Traverse Manually
  • Trim : Adjust Elevation Manually

|[ Armaments ]|

  • 1x Vozh-Ekaterina VE.52 4.7cm Autocannon, 186 rounds carried, 48rnds/min(0.8rnds/s), 760m/s(2,493ft/s)
  • 1x Shrubvashk ShR-42B Coaxial 7.62mm Machine Gun, 600rnds/s(10rnds/s), 820m/s(2,690ft/s)
  • 1x Shrubvashk ShR-42C Pintle-mounted 7.62mm Machine Gun, 600rnds/s(10rnds/s), 820m/s(2,690ft/s)
  • "Renshash" Anti-Tank Guided Missile, 4km(2.48mil), Mach 0.583(200m/s, 656ft/s)

|[ Notes ]|

  • quite proud of the simple insignia this has.. which was from my Vednovig Type-26(unreleased) which in turn was for my submarine MRNS Shiyla, it has two white swords instead of a red hammer but y'know, ya! :3
  • meo www

General Characteristics

  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 9.6ft (2.9m)
  • Length 20.8ft (6.3m)
  • Height 13.3ft (4.1m)
  • Empty Weight 18,217lbs (8,263kg)
  • Loaded Weight 18,653lbs (8,460kg)

Performance

  • Wing Loading N/A
  • Wing Area 0.0ft2 (0.0m2)
  • Drag Points 1630

Parts

  • Number of Parts 141
  • Control Surfaces 0
  • Performance Cost 576
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    9,774 SPsidearm

    Jaxcorp standard issue.

    +1 one month ago
  • Profile image
    90.9k Monarchii

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover lmao yah

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @Monarchii @AeroTactical
    We think he may join the Reformists
    About time they got some more members lol

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    90.9k Monarchii

    @Rob119 nnoooooOOOO

    +1 one month ago
  • Profile image
    26.4k Rob119

    When my Type-82 UCV Infantry Fighting, Vehicles

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    90.9k Monarchii

    @AeroTactical consult @TheUltimatePlaneLover, pick a side, and build something that you think will help your side winning

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    7,797 AeroTactical

    M-War

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    90.9k Monarchii

    @AeroTactical as in.. what? M-War or the vehicle?

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    7,797 AeroTactical

    Question.. where can i enter this?

    +1 one month ago
  • Profile image
    90.9k Monarchii

    @localf15enjoyer my apologies XD

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    Thank you for non-drunk thumbnails 🙏

    +1 one month ago
  • Profile image
    90.9k Monarchii

    @YarisHatchback noted XD, but God do I have to make the M-War forces.. I have like a 2 weeks, so I can probably throw it in somewhere there

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @Monarchii uhhh... make it optional atleast?

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    90.9k Monarchii

    @JSTQ same

    +1 one month ago
  • Profile image
    5,598 JSTQ

    @Monarchii It's okay. And I am currently researching FT. There are still many things I don't understand

    +1 one month ago
  • Profile image
    90.9k Monarchii

    @JSTQ oh, well idk, I don't do FT XD, o actually forgot where I took the code even..

    +1 one month ago
  • Profile image
    5,598 JSTQ

    @Monarchii ... I said how I could understand it all. It was the same principle as I learned
    Find the enemy's coordinates, calculate the flight time, convert the coordinate system, and aim with the current coordinate system

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    90.9k Monarchii

    @JSTQ PlanariaLab deleted it a while ago, and the only example I have is the Hansen which someone archived for me.
    .
    also yes, but not to the extent of PlanariaLab's tiltproof, that code is smart

    +1 one month ago
  • Profile image
    5,598 JSTQ

    @Monarchii Um... do you have an address? I would like to see it. Speaking of which, isn't yours also anti tilt?

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    90.9k Monarchii

    @JSTQ PlanariaLab's super Autoaim code, needs a lot of tedious work to make work, but not only it's tilt proof, it works superbly XD.. but it's way too complicated and I can't do FT..

    +1 one month ago
  • Profile image

    @Monarchii Ah true
    Unless it's captured...

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    5,598 JSTQ

    @Monarchii Simple is simple, to put it simply, it's just a parabolic and coordinate system transformation. It's such a long paragraph, I almost didn't understand who is who… parachan?

    +1 one month ago
  • Profile image
    90.9k Monarchii

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover just don't forget to pull away the insignia if it's a Loyalist Type-82 XD

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    90.9k Monarchii

    @JSTQ it's rather simple, if not, more easier to implement compared to parachan XD, I'm just lazy to use variables tab on this one and just grabbed subassembly prepared rotators lol

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @Monarchii Ohh ok

    one month ago
  • Log in to see more comments