Profile image

Excision MkII-Class Dreadnought

53.5k Ephwurd  7.9 years ago
Auto Credit Based on Ephwurd's Excision-Class Dreadnought

Controls are the same as the predecessor.


While considered a massive waste of funds and tax money during its time of construction and completion, the Excision-Class dreadnought served well during during the First Tor War, proving to be notoriously effective against the far larger Tor kingships. It did had one fatal flaw though, and that was its lack of point-defense weaponry, making it utterly defenseless against missiles, torpedoes and bomber squadrons. Several Tor bomber squadrons took advantage of this weakness and were able to cripple 7 dreadnoughts in the first week of the war. The MkII variant fixes this flaw with an added set of high-intensity, low-yield point defense lasers that helped greatly in repelling fighters, bombers, missiles and torpedoes. Ventral turrets were also added to repel underside attackers.

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor Excision-Class Dreadnought
  • Successors 4 airplane(s) +182 bonus
  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 44.2ft (13.5m)
  • Length 182.2ft (55.5m)
  • Height 16.5ft (5.0m)
  • Empty Weight 36,434lbs (16,526kg)
  • Loaded Weight 52,417lbs (23,776kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 1.286
  • Wing Loading 75.8lbs/ft2 (370.1kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 691.6ft2 (64.3m2)
  • Drag Points 44772

Parts

  • Number of Parts 626
  • Control Surfaces 8
  • Performance Cost 2,333
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    53.5k Ephwurd

    @MrMecha Thank you! The previous version of this stole all the upvotes hehe but I sure hope it will

    7.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    53.5k Ephwurd

    @ZephyrSystems indeed!

    7.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    629 Sakari

    I may have added my "little toy" that only the best of planes can survive let alone be controlable at 100% power :3

    If you want me to post the 'adjusted' version which I made just ask

    To @Ephwurd

    7.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Ephwurd yeah so that's why my BB fleet is mixed

    7.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    53.5k Ephwurd

    @JoddyFubuki788 Excision-Class dreadnoughts are best suited for frontline assault and support roles.

    7.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    My fleet will use 1 or 2 Exicision Mk.II ships with other battleships (BBV or even FBB)

    7.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    I have lots of planes awaits to launch and for my fleet it'll be 5 fleets as single large combined fleet task force, consists of 1 carrier task force, 1 Battleship fleet, 1 fleet of frigates, one fleet of Destroyers and one more for cruisers @Ephwurd @PyrusEnderhunter

    7.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Ephwurd ouch it was Mk.VI

    7.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    53.5k Ephwurd

    @JoddyFubuki788 I don't feel like upgrading it anymore, I feel like it has reached its maximum level (which was your latest version with the super pack)

    7.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Ephwurd pls about garuda?

    7.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    53.5k Ephwurd

    @JoddyFubuki788 My Interdictor series are their main starfighter complement, although they can also hold aerospace fighters for planetary operations. As for the bombers, they are still under construction.

    7.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Ephwurd what about their fighters, bombers, and multiroles?

    7.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    156k MAHADI

    SUPER COOL...

    7.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    53.5k Ephwurd

    @PyrusEnderhunter I will, though I will have to make some revisions ;)

    7.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Ephwurd Ah yes. The first TOR war... can u write about dat plz?

    7.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    53.5k Ephwurd

    @Sakari what did you do to my ship?

    7.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    629 Sakari

    Yeah I tryed that could not survive upwards of .2 C
    @Ephwurd

    7.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    53.5k Ephwurd

    @Sakari it's a spaceship, they only go that fast in space

    7.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    629 Sakari

    I find it sad I can't go faster than 500mp/h safely. other wise pretty neat!

    7.9 years ago