Brief history
in alternative universe
1936.
Summer.
After first success of P-36 Hawk over Seversky P-35, Curtiss-Wright Corporation proceeds to improve their construction for upcoming USAAC competition, as well as redesigning it, leading to creation of P-37, XP-42 and Hawk 75N.
Hawk 75N was supposed to become a carrier based version of P-36.
Unfortunately, this project was unsuccessful... It had troubles with engine performance, landing gears and wings integrity
All schemes and 3 flyable prototypes was sold to Brewster Aeronautical which
renamed it to XF2-Y1 (nicknamed Bull by test pilots).
Upon summer of 1937, Brewster discontinues this project in order to create a naval fighter from scratch, although using some elements from this design.
Controls
Normal flight controls
TRIM - TRIM
VTOL 0-49% Down - Combat worthy flaps
VTOL 50-100% Down - Takeoff flaps position
AG7 - Open/close canopy
AG8 - master switch
AG1 + FireWeapon - Aerobatic smoke
Camera 1 - Gunsight view
Features simplistic cockpit
Gauges
- & 2. Speedometers (TAS & IAS)
- Fuel gauge & engine status
- Navigation (Left : Pitch; Right : Roll)
- Clocks
- Heading (up = North; down = South)
- Altitude (m)
Extra pictures
Notes
Cruise speed ~ 300 km/h (TAS, 1000m)
Service ceiling ~ 3500 m
Exceeding ~400km/h IAS result in maneuverability loss
Approx. Takeoff speed ~ 135km/h (IAS, full Flaps)
Approx. Landing speed ~ 125 km/h (IAS, 1/2 Flaps)
Stall appear on ~ 115 km/h IAS
Be vigilant on Takeoff (Use of Yaw is recommended)
The End
p.s. dont. ever. come. at. me. again. with. that. BULL!!!
p.s.s. well lol.
Woop-woop
deep in brain
Specifications
Spotlights
- MAHADI 3.8 years ago
- IGNikolaev 4.3 years ago
- Timur24K 4.3 years ago
General Characteristics
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 29.2ft (8.9m)
- Length 29.2ft (8.9m)
- Height 9.5ft (2.9m)
- Empty Weight 4,622lbs (2,096kg)
- Loaded Weight 5,512lbs (2,500kg)
Performance
- Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.065
- Wing Loading 12.1lbs/ft2 (59.0kg/m2)
- Wing Area 455.8ft2 (42.3m2)
- Drag Points 1578
Parts
- Number of Parts 592
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 2,257
@banbantheman перевод был для мимо проходящих и любопытных, не все тут могут в русиш.
Ах да, и тебе удачи сталкер.
@Grob0s0VBRa братиш, мне переводить не нужно. жду твоих построек. удачи тебе в вартандере.
@banbantheman
Такс ну до конца месяца думаю успеть доработать робо-паука и машинку (если оную можно так назвать).
А так, чисто в War Thunder катал почти 2 месяца, поэтому никаких загрузок, вообще ни-че-го.
Translation for curious : There would be 2 uploads until the end of month, spider-tank and ground vehicle (lets say that is replica, doom wheel, yey).
Reason of inactivity : just jumped in War Thunder for like 2 month.
братиш, когда новая постройка?
all g : )
@Grob0s0VBRa
Of course! @Grob0s0VBRa
@Ergi @Tums @IreneFritzruss
Thanks yo all
@Bobofboblandia @SodiumChloride @Hayhayjam664
Thanks for your upvotes
@HeavyC22 @WrongFlyer @Aldriech
Yey, thanks for ups
@Treadmill103 @BaNg @Sovietstrike333
Thanks
@TurtlesThatFly
Actually, it was supposed to be ugly and have flaws, on purpose...
Like really, experimental, pre-serie craft that barely can make it in air in one piece and definitely would not see any military action.
Thanks for upvote by the way
Beautiful as always
Absolutely beautiful. I love the little details on this aircraft like the gunsight, the gear, the casing ejection, the cockpit, and more. The paneling and striped rudder is great too. Only thing I don’t really like is the thin wings and tiny stabilizers, as well as how underpowered it is, but the fun details are awesome. You’ve earned an upvote!
@Yourcrush
Yey, thanks for updoot
@Tums
Tag
@Ergi @Hayhayjam664 @TJAirDesign
Tags
@Aldriech @TurtlesThatFly @avgeek101
le tags