I couldn't upload it in time cuz of online school ._. but here it is.
Introducing the W320-3
The W320-3 is the first narrow-body airliner I have made, obviously. It was a bit difficult since I was used to building bigger planes but I got there in the end. Equipped with 2 IFC250-C6, it can reach speeds of over mach 0.93 (dont ask me why). It can typically seat around 194 passengers, though it is capable of seating up to 234 passengers in a single-class configuration (economy). The W320-3 has a range of over...uh ._. yes. All I know is that it can fly for a long time.
Controls:
AG1: Nav, Strobe, Beacon and anti-collision lights
AG2: Spoilers (not functional, just for looks)
AG3: Reverse thrust
AG4: Landing lights and taxi lights
AG5: Cabin lights
VTOL down: Flaps (not functional, just for looks)
Trim: Trim
If you like it then comment or upvote, or do whatever you like.
Specifications
Spotlights
- DerVito 4.2 years ago
- FeiWu 4.2 years ago
- Moonraker 4.2 years ago
- XAircraftManufacturer 4.2 years ago
- AnIndonesianGuy 4.2 years ago
- qwerty132 4.2 years ago
- chibikitsune 4.2 years ago
- Astro12 4.2 years ago
- Homemade1 4.2 years ago
General Characteristics
- Predecessor W320-3
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 113.3ft (34.5m)
- Length 137.7ft (42.0m)
- Height 41.7ft (12.7m)
- Empty Weight 79,165lbs (35,908kg)
- Loaded Weight 128,619lbs (58,340kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 2.096
- Wing Loading 32.3lbs/ft2 (157.6kg/m2)
- Wing Area 3,984.7ft2 (370.2m2)
- Drag Points 38825
Parts
- Number of Parts 380
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 1,731
TIME TO PUT BOMBS
@WingworksDesignCo as airliner builder, i want to say.. "THIS IS VERY EPIC BRO!!!!!" I LIKE THOSE WINGS!
@Laurenz111 thank u
@WingworksDesignCo well then we're supposed to try to get higher XD. Although flaps could help with relative airspeed, which is really low at 110,000ft? But yeah the flaps not functional (They do look great though)
@Laurenz111 flaps dont do anything other than slow you down which is helpful for landing when you're descending from 110,000ft at mach 1+ lol
@WingworksDesignCo yeah I flew it over 110,000 ft. With all trim and flaps and pitch and thrust it can
Oh srry kinda late... BUT FINNALY :D
Thx @WingworksDesignCo
Yes good @WingworksDesignCo
@PointlessWhyshouldiPointlessWhyshouldiTheDumDum your name has broken the website lol
@Zatomika yes
Ah yes it seems that I have found you
@Laurenz111 lol 110,000ft??
Nice plane! Somehow you can fly this thing over 110.000 ft smoothly. You got my upvote!
@HeckalXD yes
Kayak embraer E2 jet, tapi... yaa gitulah wkwkw
@Ferrolon lolol
@WingworksDesignCo No problem at all, pal. ;)
@qwerty132 Thank u, still need some wing flex then I'll be copy pasting the wing everywhere lol
Wow, those wings are amazing
@MobileFriendly :)) Thank you. The wings are the ones that delayed this plane for very long, I decided to go with triangle technique/tapered wing thing
lol i just realized the screenshots i used was during the testing
@Boeing777x thankss
@Pita yos
Excellent work, my buddy. ;)
@zzoop thanks :)