Profile image

Arado E.655 B-1

119k DestinyAviation  7.0 years ago

Controls
-Action group 8 + VTOL down: Open bomb bay doors (VTOL up to close them)
-Action group 7 + VTOL: Traverse turret
-Action group 6 + VTOL: Traverse Rear turret
-Action group 5: Toggle pilots cannons
-Action group 1: Drop first row of bombs
-Action group 2: Drop second row of bombs

First entering service in 1949, the Arado E.655 was the successor to the E.555 "Amerika Bomber". It had the same payload capability as the E.555, but could fly faster and farther than even most of the escort fighters tasked with protecting it. For defense, it had a twin-mount MG.151 turret situated above and behind the cockpit, along a twin-mount MK.108 30mm cannon turret positioned in the extreme rear of the fuselage. Both turrets were remote-controlled by the weapons officer. The E.655 had a crew of four: A pilot, a navigator/radio-operator, weapons officer, and a bombardier. The B series variant was designed to be sold to other countries. Such countries were Japan, Romania, Hungary, and Finland, who all used E.655s for many years. A pair of E.655s are still used as maritime patrol aircraft in Romania, though they have been modernized and updated to adapt to recent leaps in warfare.

The aircraft shown here is of the IJA, in unknown squadron markings. It is equipped with three 1,500Kg bombs, along with two 6,000Kg bombs.

General Characteristics

  • Created On Mac
  • Wingspan 105.5ft (32.2m)
  • Length 82.2ft (25.1m)
  • Height 25.4ft (7.7m)
  • Empty Weight 95,699lbs (43,408kg)
  • Loaded Weight 129,825lbs (58,887kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 2.077
  • Wing Loading 75.0lbs/ft2 (366.1kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 1,731.6ft2 (160.9m2)
  • Drag Points 32213

Parts

  • Number of Parts 245
  • Control Surfaces 8
  • Performance Cost 1,033
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    @FGW2014 I can post the link in a comment for you on your latest build

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    31.2k SlimSimpy

    @DestinyAviation can you link it to me?

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    31.2k SlimSimpy

    @DestinyAviation ok thx

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @FGW2014 No. You can just go to the airplane search

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    31.2k SlimSimpy

    @DestinyAviation under mods?

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @FGW2014 I use a modded rotator that is activated by the landing gear function. If you look up something like "landing gear rotators", they should pop up.

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    31.2k SlimSimpy

    How do i do the custom landing gear? Like the hinge things in xml

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @PyrusEnderhunter yup :)

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @DestinyAviation even then, I still have homework.

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @PyrusEnderhunter yeah, that's usually when I have time

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @DestinyAviation yep, same. I usually just build on Friday and the weekends.

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @RussianAS if you want, I can upload a high-detail version later today (or sometime tomorrow).

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @PyrusEnderhunter yeah, I know. I also just don't have a lot of time to build nowadays, so I do the best I can with the time that I have.

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @RussianAS @DestinyAviation weird: I’m looking at this conversation, but my definition of mobile friendly is like....500 parts....

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    153k RussianAce

    @DestinyAviation ok

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @RussianAS Ok. Well, I usually go for more mobile-friendly builds (yeah, I know that they made it so that they can download higher part-count planes). I also just don't really know what details to put, other than some intakes to look like panel lines. I also try to go for performance, and at least in this planes case, it performs like a real jet bomber does.

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    153k RussianAce

    @DestinyAviation To make the details?

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @RussianAS Oh, ok. What do you think I could have done better?

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    153k RussianAce

    @DestinyAviation Forgive me, I'm just a bad interpreter, I meant (Bad, maybe better)

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @RussianAS What is "badly"?

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    153k RussianAce

    Badly...Could be better

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    Awesome ;)

    7.0 years ago