@KPLBall aaaa

@JABH this was a final modification to a very old aircraft I made lol

Tip: You should add more thickness to the wings.

@KPLBall Oh
Well that's a good way to do it

@TheUltimatePlaneLover with and without

@KPLBall Without missiles? Or with?

@TheUltimatePlaneLover I'ma dogfight the F-36X with the Thunder II

@KPLBall Ah okay

@TheUltimatePlaneLover no, like better in missiles than the F-36

@KPLBall Ah so pretty much pullin' a "Falchion" here (retire the old one due to a severe improvement already in development)
Noiceee

@KPLBall nice

@TheUltimatePlaneLover @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 I will make a Thunder II! It's gonna be way better than ever

@TheUltimatePlaneLover ah

@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
1. The F-33 isn't technically an interceptor, but it is a multi-role fighter, so similarly to say the F-15 and F-16, it's not designed to intercept, but it still can do so just as well as other roles, and thus counts.
2. Star Thunder, the forgotten beast (I gave it yet another upgrade but I have yet to reveal it). The FI-90A is more of an interceptor than the FI-90N-5 though, the N-variant gives it multirole capabilities (reference Operation Astro-Inferno), whereas the FI-90 is stuck to hunting bombers lol
3.The FI-64... doesn't exist, as it would turn out; It's actually the FI-63. Either way, I was referring to the Screecher even if I botched up the designation lol. So, anyways, the FI-63 was the secondary predecessor to the FI-90, the only one in between them being the unreleased FI-88. The 63 was essentially designed to be a missile truck and little more, but it has decent performance that makes its interceptor role a breeze.
4. Like the F-33, the F/A-29 Interdictor is less of a dedicated interceptor and more of a multi-role fighter. But I'm fine discounting this one for two reasons: A. the F/A-29 was, is, and without engine upgrades will remain slower than the F-33s, and B. the F/A-29 is less of a multirole fighter, and more of an interdictor, unsurprisingly.

Also I should get around to making the Syncopator (Intimidator/Intderictor modification- promised F-29 variant with thrust vectoring that never happened, but not exactly cancelled, just forgot about it :v)
Speaking of Intimidators, our new mainline fighters should be capable of interception as well (FTA-24 Trident/FT-8A Intimidator II)

@TheUltimatePlaneLover I didn’t know the F-33 was an interceptor, I forgot about the star thunder, what’s the FI-64, and I didn’t know the interdictier was an interceptor

@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 @KPLBall Actually we have a ton of interceptors if you think about it:
-F-36 (any variant)
-F-33/F-33A-50
-FI-90A
-FI-90N-5
-FI-64 (rare usage, mostly forgotten)
-FA-29 Interdictor (rare usage, mostly forgotten)
-FA-32A/B Striker
-Several SAMs and other surface-to-air weapons
-Warships

@TheUltimatePlaneLover yeah, just really overshadowed due to the fact that the F-36 is an interceptor

@SPsidearm plæñē

Actually kind of a neat design, sad to see it go

tank

I wonder how the rest of the MDA will react? 🤔🤔🤔🤔

Other-5
@Deeganishcountryball
@Yeetuscheese

Other-4
@Rob119
@Imperialndustries
@Chaunhkhoa

Other-3
@Mosquitowithamachinegun
@SPSidearm
@WizNick

Other-2
@Boeing727200F
@Panzerwaifu69
@Zero0Two2