No Tags
Auto Credit Based on hypnotoad's wing design, need help
@hypnotoad this is for you... This was much easier that expected all i did was pull the wings back one space and then extend them to look right it is a little nose heavy and wings can rip off in high speed manuvers but otherwise a pretty good plane... Good job hypnotoad
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Predecessor wing design, need help
- Created On iOS
- Wingspan 35.8ft (10.9m)
- Length 34.3ft (10.5m)
- Height 8.1ft (2.5m)
- Empty Weight 7,043lbs (3,195kg)
- Loaded Weight 10,899lbs (4,944kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 3.092
- Wing Loading 35.9lbs/ft2 (175.1kg/m2)
- Wing Area 303.9ft2 (28.2m2)
- Drag Points 1386
Parts
- Number of Parts 26
- Control Surfaces 7
- Performance Cost 232
- Log in to leave a comment
-
7,262 Zing2000@GKrollin ok I might have 1stard a plane but it was completely unrelated... Your plane was a flying f*ck that is inappropriate and so I have also reported it because it was not child friendly... In actual fact you weren't mature either by posting that plane you can have it by your self but do not post planes like that... It actually against the rules if you even bothered to read them9.7 years ago
-
38.8k hypnotoad@GKrollin hi GK, this is my design sir, and this particular plane is a fix of my origional, which you harshly; but fairly describe in your rating. Zing has taken my poor design and made flyable, to me the skill has come out of keeping to the origional and flawed design, this plane I no way represents zings capabilities, it shows his ability to fix others designs with understanding.9.7 years ago
-
38.8k hypnotoad@Zing2000 hahahaha. Well I certainly respect your earned rank sir, it hasn't come without work That's for sure. I hope to learn quickly.9.7 years ago
-
205 GKrollin@Zing2000 At least you did the mature thing and didn't just go one-star one of my planes. Oh wait, that's what you did.9.7 years ago
-
7,262 Zing2000@GKrollin i did not make this plane if you want to rate badly rate the original not mine... i just got it to fly properly... this is not my design at all so dont rate mine badly please...9.7 years ago
-
205 GKrollinAnother lazy example of form over function. Very fragile, easy to lose control. Good looking.9.7 years ago
-
7,262 Zing2000@hypnotoad tbh i should be telling you all this being the seinor builder and all9.7 years ago
-
38.8k hypnotoadNice job, and I totally agree with the philosophy of keeping to the origional. Think it makes us better builders to try and make a plane better. You can certainly see my style has changed, all comes with time dude. Keep up the good work buddy.9.7 years ago
-
7,262 Zing2000@hypnotoad yeah i try and be the best builder i can but and when i fix i try and keep it as close to the original as possible and this is pretty much ur plane so im happy with this fix9.7 years ago
-
38.8k hypnotoadNice job Zing! That was a very tidy fix mate. Thanks also for telling me how you sorted it too, always helpful to know what it was that makes an unflyable and unstable plane; flyable again. like your style as always sir9.7 years ago
