"We lost Australia because of the Paternian Phantom. Our E-1s were sitting ducks, because they had Sparrow missiles that could hit you from beyond the horizon, where our missiles needed to be behind the enemy at much closer distances so it could lock on. You weren't even safe on the ground; they had TV-guided Walleye bombs that could punch through our hardened shelters as if they were made of wet cardboard. The Phantoms rendered our air force impotent within a week." -Anonymous Sentian Air Force officer, Sentian Federation Air Force, captured.
The controls are identical to the predecessor. My remake of KevinAirlines' F-4 Phantom II. Because mine wasn't exactly something to be proud of. Now, you can have a two-tone paint job where the bottom of the plane can be a different color than the top of the plane.
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Predecessor McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 36.8ft (11.2m)
- Length 55.0ft (16.8m)
- Height 17.5ft (5.3m)
- Empty Weight 30,432lbs (13,804kg)
- Loaded Weight 38,462lbs (17,446kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 1.752
- Wing Loading 58.5lbs/ft2 (285.5kg/m2)
- Wing Area 657.8ft2 (61.1m2)
- Drag Points 8521
Parts
- Number of Parts 295
- Control Surfaces 8
- Performance Cost 1,203
@Pilotmario Permission for ordering all of your Phantoms as Heavy fighters for our Air Force?
@Pilotmario there ARE no ground defenses left XD
@Pilotmario wowwww.............
@PyrusEnderhunter lol goodnight. The Paternian Air Force sends its regards.
And by regards, I mean "the destruction of your ground defenses".
@Pilotmario not right now... gotta sleep. ITS MIDNIGHT
@PyrusEnderhunter State it.
@Pilotmario *wasnt able to respond because at school, plus, you don't even know what my AA systems ARE...
@PyrusEnderhunter Also, based on our experience in Africa, your systems are still ineffective. Of the 100 Phantoms, 150 Tigers, and 50 Starfighters, with six-hundred missions and over nine-thousand sorties, we only noted seven losses; one Phantom to a landing mishap, two F-5s shot down by ground fire, two F-104 lost in accidents, and two F-104 lost to engine failure. The F-104 was considered the least safe aircraft of the three to fly due to its tricky flight characteristics and single engine configuration; the dual engines of the F-4 and the F-5 provide some measure of redundancy if one engine was not able to function due to in-flight damage or breakdown, and are much easier to fly. In Paternian service, the low safety margin for the F-104 is partially compensated by its use with more skilled reservists and use as a dedicated interceptor.
@Pilotmario freakin' really... ;-;
@PyrusEnderhunter I didn't know that.
@Pilotmario no. New ones. And I couldn't even respond cause I was doing school.... u scum bag....
@PyrusEnderhunter The air defenses that failed to bring down a single Phantom?
@Pilotmario do u even know what my air defense systems ARE? XD
@PyrusEnderhunter They have jets that can challenge your air defense systems.
@Pilotmario walls... with every AA system available XD
@PyrusEnderhunter A wall's not going to work. Mostly because they have this thing called airplanes that can fly over walls.
@Pilotmario of which...
@Pilotmario next to a nation who also wants to absolutely annihilate me... unless u plan on helping me build a wall to protect against dat Ecuador, I ain't moving...
@PyrusEnderhunter Gato won't invade. He's got other shiet to worry about.
@Pilotmario slightly more defensible..... nope ...
@PyrusEnderhunter It's a slightly more defensible position.
@Pilotmario that's were Elgato is....
@Pilotmario u sh*ting me?
How does resettlement to Paraguay sound? @PyrusEnderhunter
Yes. Yes you were.
Now I need you to not invade the Stans for now. I need to get the ISFOS to Paraguay where they are harmless. @DankDorito