The F-116 "Crow" is a short range subsonic single engine attack aircraft built by the Graingy aircraft company. it is well liked by those who fly it for being manuverable, reliable, and quite well armed (as well as looking awesome with it's black paint job, with many comparing its looks to the F-24 "Silhouette"). The F-116 normally carries: 2 Boom 50 dumb bombs, 6 Inferno short range AirToGround missiles, 6 fast-firing wing-mounted cannons, 1 nose-mounted minigun, and 1 nose-mounted 20mm cannon firing high-explosive rounds. The F-116 is capable of defending itself from enemy aircraft but is only armed with it's cannons and minigun for anti-air capability. The Graingy aircraft logo is also present just in front of the air inlets. might be more info in comments
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Created On Mac
- Wingspan 45.3ft (13.8m)
- Length 47.8ft (14.6m)
- Height 15.6ft (4.8m)
- Empty Weight 12,479lbs (5,660kg)
- Loaded Weight 14,841lbs (6,731kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 1.362
- Wing Loading 33.1lbs/ft2 (161.4kg/m2)
- Wing Area 449.0ft2 (41.7m2)
- Drag Points 3335
Parts
- Number of Parts 79
- Control Surfaces 5
- Performance Cost 413
@YarisSedan Yeah lol.
The one in the picture, as mentioned, was a test, but this is an actual product, albeit an older one in need of a refresh.
@Graingy i mean, i didn't know that this build even existed on your profile in the first place, i thought it's some kind of private build but i was wrong, but i guess that's what i get for not digging any deeper when going to your profile at all
@YarisSedan ?
less gooo
10!
20/5/24 A short upvote bomb by Majakalona
@Graingy maybe
@screechy TheMouse spotlighted it?
How did this get in my Jet Stream?
@TheMouse Ah
My bad, I must've misclicked and not actually hit the button.
That's on me.
@Graingy
You did not tag me. I just found this by accident. If you had mentioned me, I would have answered much quicker.
@TheMouse You took days to respond.
Yes, the cannon is subpar. That design was adjusted in the B-200B,
Fuselage wings were not an actively used design feature around these parts (account) back then. They were not a concern. Also, so many times when I've tried fuselage wings they fucked up the flight performance for reasons beyond my understanding. That's why the SAN-74 only had fuselage on the leading edge of the wings: I didn't want to risk screwing up the miraculously stable aircraft.
@Graingy
The cannon sticking right out of the front. Lack of fuselage wings. Tons of other small things.
"Which would not be difficult at all considering how much fixing this needs"
Okay, explain.
I'd consider this one of our highlights. What is wrong with it in your eyes?
@Graingy
No. But I have learned knowledge. Legally, I do not have to pay you anything to take this build, as long as I change enough stuff in it. (Which would not be difficult at all considering how much fixing this needs)
Dont worry, I will be sure to give credit!
laughs in a very evil voice
@TheMouse are you less poor now?
@Graingy *cawk*
@MonarchiiwithastolenMG Alright I'll let you deal with that in peace.
@Graingy *CAWK*
@MonarchiiwithastolenMG I thought you dealt with that!
@Graingy *cawk*
@Mousewithamachinegun122 Ah...
@MonarchiiwithastolenMG!
They're affordable, efficient, and reliable!
@Graingy
Have I mentioned our lack of funds?
@MousewithaMachineGun122 Actually, this is one of our most prominent modern products. I was hoping to present this aircraft for possible sale to the MGLA?
It's basically our Su-25.
Changing that, Dated 1982
Oh, this thing is DATED alright.
God