Profile image

No Vertical Stabilizer test

25.2k A5mod3us  8.8 years ago
305 downloads
No Tags

Nothing fancy here. Just a test bed to demonstrate a method of stabilizing a plane without a vertical stabilizer.

Here we have a plane with no vertical fins or stabilizers of any kind. There are no hidden stabilizers in the fuselage, and no cleverly placed wing parts to add stability. Instead, stability is gained with a set of 4 air-brakes placed at the rear of the fuselage. These create drag and keep the plane pointed forward.

To take off: Move VTOL slider up to around the 75% mark, then throttle up and go.

She may begin to oscillate left and right after banking, so just use the rudder controls to counter it and straighten yourself out.

She's not terribly maneuverable, and she needs a lot of speed for take-off and landing.

Hope y'all get a kick out of this.

HAPPY FLYING!

General Characteristics

  • Successors 1 airplane(s) +14 bonus
  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 36.1ft (11.0m)
  • Length 42.2ft (12.9m)
  • Height 5.7ft (1.8m)
  • Empty Weight 9,871lbs (4,477kg)
  • Loaded Weight 23,985lbs (10,879kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 2.81
  • Wing Loading 36.4lbs/ft2 (177.6kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 659.3ft2 (61.3m2)
  • Drag Points 2855

Parts

  • Number of Parts 53
  • Control Surfaces 8
  • Performance Cost 390
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    25.2k A5mod3us

    @Mrwhiskers85 I checked it out. The Dihedral on the main wing, and anhedral on the forward canards are was stabilize his plane. If those surfaces were perpendicular to the fuselage it wouldn't work.
    .
    It's a neat little plane, though.

    8.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    7,404 Mrwhiskers85

    @A5mod3us You should check out @DeezDuck 's entry to my latest challenge. he made a forward swept canard with no vertical stabizer

    8.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.2k A5mod3us

    @Cedy117 True. It would be nice if fuselage parts at least generated a small amount of aerodynamic lift.

    8.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.2k A5mod3us

    @Flightsonic Yeah. I've made flying wings without vertical stabilization. Same deal, though. Basically I put air-brakes on the wings to act as spoilers in the place of a rudder. Flies, but requires constant correction.

    I'm thinking about using this method to build a prop powered plane in the style of a manta or stingray.

    8.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    49.1k Flightsonic

    Hmmm i did try something like this, its currently unlisted, but great idea to have the airbrakes on the back as well, mine you had to constantly adjust

    8.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    77.9k Cedy117

    Cool idea to bad the games physics weren't more complex that way you can just make a cleaverly shaped fuselage to keep it goin striat

    8.8 years ago