Profile image

Heschia Hes-10 B-1

28.7k TWDDerSharkmarine  2.1 years ago
Auto Credit Based on TWDDerSharkmarine's Heschia Hes-10 B-1

Heschia Hes-10 B-1


[Description]

In the 1920's up to early 1930's, Trislandia has seen their airforce growing in size rapidly, this neccessitated training a bunch of new pilots, and so RLM Specification T12/1934 was made, the request is simple, monoplane single engine single seater advanced trainer aircraft with maximum speed of atleast 350km/h that can be easily made with capability to be converted into a twin seater

Two company reached out to tackle this Specification, Heschia, and Diesler, Heschia produced the Hes-10, while Diesler produced the Di-45 Antares, Heschia uses the Elfenhaven ELV12-33/850 Hornet V12 engine producing 850hp, while Diesler uses the older but frankly more robust Elfenhaven ELR9-27/650 Antares 9-Cylinder Radial engine producing 650hp, out of the two competing aircraft, Hes-10 is found to be good for the more advanced trainer with its high speed and slightly more difficult controls, while Di-45 is good for beginners thanks to its much more favorable control and slightly lower speed, eventually both aircraft were ordered to be made, about 2500 Hes-10 was made and to this day, some flight school in Trislandia still uses the Hes-10 alongside the more numerous Di-45 for their flight training


[Specifications]

Crew: 1 Pilot
Max.Speed: 575km/h @ 3000m
Cruise Speed: 375km/h
Max.Altitude: 8.000m
Arnament: 2x Rheinmetall MG-7 7.92mm Machine Gun (500x rounds per gun)
Payload: 2x 50kg bombs, 1x 100kg bombs, 1x 350L Fuel tank


[Creator's Note]

Whoo, finally got this out of the way, just uploaded it in the morning before going for today's exam on Calculus, yeah that's gonna be pain i think, while i suffer in my exam and waiting for me to reply, you can fly this plane, a simple single seater advanced trainer and light fighter, its quite a decent plane i think, with most people who test flown this aircraft noting favorable control at medium speed

Some interesting things while i was making this aircraft, i keep finding ways to use parts more efficiently, like replacing the camera that came with the seat along with the flight computer with a simple blocky cockpit (that's the triangle thingy you see floating about), and making the engine looks more P-40 ish instead of my more standard rounded or streamlined nose, its been quite fun, and im glad to be able to get this out in time

I really can't thank @EngineerOtaku enough for his highly impressive work on test flying this aircraft and reporting all of his findings on a note for me to use, you went beyond of what im actually expecting, and i must thank you for going the extra kilometers, i will put the note in the comments area for anyone interested on reading said note

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor Heschia Hes-10 B-1
  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 27.9ft (8.5m)
  • Length 25.2ft (7.7m)
  • Height 10.5ft (3.2m)
  • Empty Weight 5,148lbs (2,335kg)
  • Loaded Weight 5,768lbs (2,616kg)

Performance

  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.151
  • Wing Loading 40.4lbs/ft2 (197.0kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 143.0ft2 (13.3m2)
  • Drag Points 1204

Parts

  • Number of Parts 25
  • Control Surfaces 5
  • Performance Cost 226
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    @WinsWings, im sorry to ping you, but this is a submission for your "25 Parts Challenge", now the plane has been originally made as a successor to your challenge, however somewhere along the line, perhaps when i made an unlisted for test flight purposes, that successor was lost and now instead of being a successor to your challenge, its a successor to the incomplete version of this aircraft, which did successor correctly, im sorry for the slight difficulty this may cause

    Pinned 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    Credit to @EngineerOtaku for this note, thank you so much for making me this note
    .
    aircraft lacks some stability in roll response; slippery
    tendency to pitch up at speed
    Due to stability of design, trim is sensitive
    weapons fire inside diameter of propeller(?)
    .
    at 100m altitude
    Top speed measured at ~485km/hr TAS
    Roll rate measured at ~320deg/sec
    Turn rate (285-290km/hr) is around 11.85sec sustained
    Max G-force (480km/hr) instant ~12.8G, sustained ~4.4G
    AoA (~295km/hr) measured at 14.39deg
    .
    Time to climb (100-1000m) from ~470km/hr, 27.56sec - speed down to ~300km/hr, 20deg nose up attitude
    .
    at 1000m altitude
    Top speed measured at ~512km/hr TAS
    Roll rate measured at ~320deg/sec
    Turn rate (~300km/hr) is around 12.5sec sustained
    Max G-Force (~510km/hr) instant 12.8G, sustained ~4.3G
    AoA (~300km/hr) measured at 14.3deg
    .
    Time to climb (1000-3000m) from ~500km/hr, 70.55sec - speed down to ~250km/hr, 20deg nose up attitude
    .
    at 3000m altitude
    Top speed measured at ~576km/hr TAS
    Roll rate measured at ~338deg/sec
    Turn rate (~340km/hr) is around 14.55sec sustained
    Max G-Force (~510km/hr) instant 12.8G, sustained ~4.19G
    AoA (~300km/hr) measured at 14.38deg

    Pinned 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @TeyvatAirForce saying its comparable to a Ki-61 is a bit of a stretch considering the Ki-61 is a much better plane in this sense, but i do agree on the majority of this comparison

    +1 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @TWDDerSharkmarine / @EngineerOtaku

    Comparable aircraft based on specifications:

    • A6M Zero
    • Ki 43
    • Ki 61
    • some variants of Curtiss P-40
    • some variants of Hawker Hurricane
    +2 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    44.4k rexzion

    it fly goode!!!

    +1 2.1 years ago