No Tags
This plane was very hard to make, as i didnt really know what i was doing. The point is, it flies, though not nearly as well as the real zero. The real zero was fast, maneuverable, and very fragile. This one is kindve the opposite.
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Successors 1 airplane(s)
- Created On iOS
- Wingspan 40.7ft (12.4m)
- Length 33.0ft (10.0m)
- Height 12.2ft (3.7m)
- Empty Weight 6,229lbs (2,825kg)
- Loaded Weight 9,453lbs (4,288kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 1.426
- Wing Loading 26.2lbs/ft2 (127.9kg/m2)
- Wing Area 361.0ft2 (33.5m2)
- Drag Points 3886
Parts
- Number of Parts 111
- Control Surfaces 5
- Performance Cost 334
- Log in to leave a comment
-
483 VonRichthofenAlso @PlanesOfOld you did inspire me. The fuselage like this puts all the weight up at the front, that way it's more maneuverable (except with this one, I'm still working on it). Bu anyway, thanks!9.5 years ago
-
43.9k PlanesOfOld@VonRichthofen :)9.5 years ago
-
483 VonRichthofen@PlanesOfOld I just tried to put the 0.5 length nose cones on the aircraft, but they kind of look like side turrets like that. Also, I put VTOL on the prop because number one it balances out the weight some, and two, it makes it look more effective as a source of propulsion. But I will add shape to the ends, thanks!9.5 years ago
-
483 VonRichthofenThat depends on how it fell apart. Details @Superdude9.5 years ago
-
318 IlovesthecheesesWhy it fall apart9.5 years ago
-
43.9k PlanesOfOldYou can put some shape into the wings and add some wing tips that would be good also you don't need VTOL for prop I find it looks nicer and would weigh less without them btw u can also use a nosecones at 0.5 length as the Japanese symbol9.5 years ago
-
43.9k PlanesOfOldLol PLANESOFOLD style rear fuselage I see ;) I'm glad I may have inspired you9.5 years ago
