In the fifties NATO decided that 7.62x51 NATO should replace the .30-06 round. When the 7.62 NATO was chosen it was criticized because it had to much power and recoil for a modern, lightweight service rifle. Therefore after this Armalite and a bunch of other manufacturers started their Small Caliber/High Velocity (SCHV) rifle expirements using the .222 Remington cartridge. Due to the .222 Remington not meeting CONARC velocity and penetration requirments, Armalite asked Reminton to make a similar cartridge with a longer body and shorter neck. This cartridge was the .223 Remington cartridge. When the U.S. military adopted the M16, a slightly derived form of the .223 Remington cartridge known as the 5.56x45 NATO was adopted.
My replica doesn't do anything.
Enjoy!
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Created On iOS
- Wingspan 8.2ft (2.5m)
- Length 8.2ft (2.5m)
- Height 43.5ft (13.3m)
- Empty Weight 5,763lbs (2,614kg)
- Loaded Weight 5,763lbs (2,614kg)
Performance
- Wing Loading 439,839.3lbs/ft2 (2,147,483.6kg/m2)
- Wing Area 0.0ft2 (0.0m2)
- Drag Points 22327
Parts
- Number of Parts 12
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 30
what is the point of this 12 part round
I wish all militaries use this model. You know the ones that do nothing.
Thank you! :) @rubbishcraft
Np
Thanks! @Kt1578
Thanks! @Feanor
@Dllama4 hahaha, just realized! That's more powerful than the bombs we have in the game technically
One that weighs 5,763 pounds. @Supercraft888
Lol, it's an artillery shell
Thanks! @TrainDude
@Dllama4 np :D
Thanks! :) @FennVectorCWA
@plane918273645 if this was 1:1, it would be 2500x13300. in other words, a [shell].(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shell_(projectile))
Thanks! @Avro683Lancaster
Ok thanks
1:1 as in having same dimensions as the same thing? If so, no. @plane918273645
Is this 1:1 because that's a big round
Nice! What goes around comes around.