Profile image

[RvG - GRE] P-3A Thunderer

56.2k TheUltimatePlaneLover  one month ago

Red V Green...

Red V Green is known for its unique, effective, dare I say incredible designs. However, RvG is also famous for some weird, wacky, and even questionable designs that somehow work. The P-3A Thunderer is no exception to either of these!


Except I accidentally wrote "Thuderer" on the original reference three-view... oops. Oh well, I didn't need that one "n" anyways, right?


Basics

The P-3A Thunderer is a unique, pusher-propeller fighter designed by Green Team. Despite its incredible (or incredulous) design, it was in fact built in the 1940s- and it packed a serious punch!


Info

Fast, maneuverable, graceful, but strong, the P-3A is a dream to fly- well, aside from the small cockpit area. It can make quick work of most enemy fighters, so long that there's a good pilot behind the joystick.

Pros:
-Powerful cannons
-Very fast; aerodynamic design makes it far faster than most fighters of the time
-Pretty good armor
-Small cockpit; maybe uncomfortable, but it means the pilot is a much harder target
-Incredible turn/pitch rate; very agile in a fight
-Pusher propeller; more efficient than puller propellers
-Surprisingly sturdy in spite of its weird design
-Internal comms system is harder to hit, but it's done right (unlike the P-30A whose comms systems are nullified by being internally mounted)

Cons:
-Good armor, but if the armor is penetrated, you're basically losing all of the plane's vitals (when being compact doesn't help)
-No pylons or hardpoints; can't carry extra/suspended armaments or drop tanks
-Very unstable on the ground; high chance to crash if you don't takeoff quickly

Tips:
-The P-3A can out-turn, out-run, and out-climb basically any plane of its time, with jets and nitroprops (e.g. F-1D, P-12A/B) being the only real exceptions. Use this to conquer virtually any opponent
-Your armor is good, but it's not your strong suit. The P-3A's guns are the strongest part of the plane, so use them to decimate enemies
-The Thunderer isn't a Stormer; always focus on enemy fighters, or occasionally bombers, but never target ground units unless it's:
1) an enemy aircraft that hasn't gotten airborne yet
or
2) an urgent ground target that must be destroyed

Random Facts:
-Unlike other RvG planes, the P-3 has no real-life counterpart (at least, none of which it is based on). However, the Thunderer does have roots in another plane which I made, the P-41A Riptide.
-Although this isn't the case in the lore, in terms of real life, the P-3A is the first RvG plane to use a Scimitar propeller blade, with all others using warbird propeller blades or jet engines.


Story

The Red V Green War was underway- and hot. Every day, planes went into the sky, with incomplete formations returning home, most of which were riddled with battle scars. But the war had to continue, there was no backing out now.

The P-2 "Stormer" was one of Green's premiere aircraft, along with the B-4A Asteroid and P-05 Combatant, all three of which fought until the latest years of the war. However, as Red Team tech was improving in an upwards curve, it became clear that the P-2A wasn't quite fit for air-to-air combat. The P-2B was made, it didn't do too well against enemy fighters either- but it was powerful against surface units. The plan was the repurpose the P-2 into a ground attack aircraft, but the issue was that they needed a fighter to replace it. In truth, the P-05 was amazing, but there simply wasn't enough of them to replace the Stormer, and bomber attacks from Red Team would make it difficult to change that. Even then, the P-05 wouldn't really fit the bill, as it was considered a heavy fighter-bomber, while the P-2, prior to its redesignation, was a light fighter. So, Green turned to the makers of the P-2, and presented them with a simple but hard task: make something that can out-fight and thus replace the P-2.

Research and such started in 1943, with Green Team engineers working tirelessly to come up with something that could get the job done. After a few years though, they finally had it. On April 2, 1945 (they waited for April 1 to pass so it would be taken seriously), the first YP-3A prototype flew, and its performance was... meh. It was good, but not anything too special- at first. However, after reviewing the design, engineers realized that the P-3A's engine was simply too weak to make it a true dominator. But unlike the P-28 Chopper, there were other engines available. Several radial and inline engines were tested, but at the end, the team decided to settle on an experiment air-powered engine, nicknamed the "Tornado" due to its loud, whirling sound. And it worked.

With the Tornado now powering the Thunderer, the P-3A could take to the skies and dominate the battlefield. It took over the P-2 Stormer's air-to-air role, although the P-2 still served as an attacker, gaining much fame as the P-2D Slasher. The P-3A, on the other hand, would be a menace in the sky, being a threat against Red Team, but even holding its own against Blue and Purple, being the first aircraft to shoot down 10 MP-41 Blizzards. The P-3 would also get upgrades which allowed it to serve all the way until 1994 when an upgraded, jet version of it was made. This variant was considered the P-4A "Bolt," ending the service of the P-3 Thunderer. However, albeit not in the military. several P-3s continue to serve to this day, taking roles such as scouting in fire departments and the coast guard.


Other Stuff



Size comparison of the P-3A to a P-65A. The Thunderer is certainly tall, but the Centerfighter certainly wins wingspan and length.


As usual, that's all. Good luck, have fun, and happy hunting!

General Characteristics

  • Created On iOS
  • Wingspan 31.6ft (9.6m)
  • Length 35.7ft (10.9m)
  • Height 16.0ft (4.9m)
  • Empty Weight 9,025lbs (4,093kg)
  • Loaded Weight 15,253lbs (6,919kg)

Performance

  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 7.708
  • Wing Loading 55.7lbs/ft2 (272.0kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 273.8ft2 (25.4m2)
  • Drag Points 4141

Parts

  • Number of Parts 202
  • Control Surfaces 7
  • Performance Cost 1,030
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover
    Let me be first now, you are required to since I did all the requirments:
    Here, I did it

    Pinned one month ago
  • Profile image

    No, you weren't. You didn't. You aren't.

    Now, go on and try to stay on the runway for 5 seconds on max power.
    Film it and only then can you have my approval to be here.

    Pinned one month ago
  • Profile image

    @CrestelAeronautics Zam I've been outmatched

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover
    Now my phone’s saying that there was an error and to try agian later, the same thing happened when I tried uploading the full video, I don’t know what to do.

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover
    Ah

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @CrestelAeronautics Maybe edit it into two parts?

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover
    The video won’t let me upload it, id just doesn’t like me! (The length is 9:30, so, a bit long)

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @overlord5453 Oh right
    About that lol
    For some reason the AI never spawns perfectly on the runway (despite using the default Wright Airport location :v). As a result, the P-65 spawned in-air, then fell on the ground and destroyed its propeller. The said P-65 is in fact an AI, yes.
    In short, that "UFO" is thankfully just a propeller blade ripped off of the P-65 due to SimplePlanes AI being goofy as heck. Of course, I'm not saying UFOs aren't real in SP, though, I've seen them once and nearly made an entire lore story based on that encounter

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    4,998 overlord5453

    is that a UFO?

    In the upper right corner of the first other stuff pic

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover
    It wasn’t an attempt, just a test. Oh, and I managed to land properly and then launch but I didn’t record it.

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @JaxHere Man everybody just be outwitting me ;-;

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @CrestelAeronautics Well, the wheels aren't on the deck, but I'll let you have it anyways since the propeller is somehow unbroken.

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    1,662 JaxHere

    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26

    THROUGHOUT HEAVEN AND EARTH, I ALONE AM THE LATE ONE…

    (Insert gojo edit here)

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover
    Does this count as a landing? (I didn’t damage anything)


    This photo was not from a recording, but from a test. I’m trying to do a flight from Yeager, do some cool tricks, and then land on the USS Beast; and fly back if possible. Seem good enough for you?

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover
    Bet.

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @Rjenteissussy
    ...I've been outplayed...

    +1 one month ago
  • Profile image

    @CrestelAeronautics
    Cool y'learned how to make videos, and nice try
    But you missed the "on max power" part. And technically the video should take 9-10 seconds to account for spawn-time, throttle-up time, and proof that you didn't crash, explode, damage the prop or spin out of control
    I'll also need time to see the menu so that I can rest assured slow-mo wasn't used
    Have fun, believe me this is the least stable aircraft in the world on take-off. In fact, I've never tested landing this one... bonus credit if you can land it without damaging anything.

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    "Throughout heaven and earth, @TheMouse wasn't here first."
    (Pin)

    +1 one month ago
  • Profile image

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover
    There, I did what the pinned comment said:
    proof

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 hmmmm
    but the comment order still favors mine
    and I made the post
    so........

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    19.1k KPLBall

    Tk nice

    +1 one month ago
  • Profile image
    4,792 Rb2h

    seconds ago

    +1 one month ago
  • Profile image

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover I upvoted before you made the comment tho

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 But I rolled it out first, so...
    :)

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover I was typing before you made that comment, and I upvoted, so I was first

    one month ago
  • Log in to see more comments