Profile image

Tu-314

13.8k vonhubert  8.2 years ago
Auto Credit Based on vonhubert's Tu-124-21 v0.23

Fictional aircraft based on tu-134. Kind of what if tu-134 be modernized aerodynamically and converted to a high speed turboprop. Here in something like business jet version.

Stabilizer (pitch adjustment) is adjustable with trim slider.

Mechanics work with VTOL slider.

AG1 - Landing gear; (100% UP = Gear Up, 0%= Gear Down)
AG2 - Flaps; (0% = Flaps retracted, 100% DOWN = Flaps deployed)
AG3 - Spoilers (= Airbrakes, 100% UP = Deployed, 0% = Retracted, tends to pitch up the plane, use on approach with partial deployment or after touch down with full deployment)
AG6 - Landing lights;
AG7 - Nav. Lights;
AG8 - Ground steering (sensitivity adjustment, when active - steers to the limit, when deactivated - steers 5 degrees, deactivate on takeoffs and landing, activate for ground maneuvers only)

Take off procedure - Trim 1/2 up, flaps 1/2 down, full thrust

Landing procedure - full flaps, trim 1/2 up, 75-80% thrust. Be careful with spoilers on landing, they pitch up the plane (surprisingly, that was an issue in real life, more modern planes compensate that automatically with stabilizer adjustment)
NEEDS SOFT LANDING

Level flight - thrust 75-80%, trim slightly below 1/4 UP

Said to be working on mobile devices. From my experince - almost a sldeshow. But i tried on samsung a3 cellphone) Probably may work on new ipads and so on.

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor Tu-124-21 v0.23
  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 97.9ft (29.8m)
  • Length 113.5ft (34.6m)
  • Height 34.8ft (10.6m)
  • Empty Weight 50,553lbs (22,930kg)
  • Loaded Weight 108,706lbs (49,308kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 0.062
  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.128
  • Wing Loading 37.3lbs/ft2 (182.1kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 2,915.2ft2 (270.8m2)
  • Drag Points 28873

Parts

  • Number of Parts 496
  • Control Surfaces 3
  • Performance Cost 2,755
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    @vonhubert Scary, but I can see that that was the style you were going for in the first one.

    7.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    13.8k vonhubert

    @pushthelimits Thanks. It's like 1960s version, and i do admit, it looks kind of more elegant. But I plan on making another "modern" one with modern streamlined prop, like current D-27 engine
    http://spetstechnoexport.com/upload/engines/D-27.jpg

    7.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    @vonhubert Nice. The new prop style makes it look cleaner, too.

    7.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    13.8k vonhubert

    @pushthelimits i actually finally did one a lot better. Basically everything except from base airframe made new: flaps, cockpit, engines are new, landing gear and tail are heavily modified

    https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/4azLcA/Tu-314-1970s-highspeed-turboprop-regional-liner

    7.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    @vonhubert That sounds awesome to look at.

    7.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    13.8k vonhubert

    I will be uploading a new version (better engines, cockpit, flaps and landing gear) soon, stay tuned)

    7.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    13.8k vonhubert

    @pushthelimits by the way, that's a model of real engine Ivchenko-Progress D-27, the only current Prop-Fan engine in use (though limited) - on AN-70 military cargo plane) And in reality - it has 8 instead of 6 blades on each prop)))
    https://www.google.ru/search?q=d-27&newwindow=1&espv=2&biw=1870&bih=861&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi0wtyypLzRAhVhKpoKHfhgBcQQ_AUIBigB#newwindow=1&tbm=isch&q=progress+d-27

    7.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @vonhubert Those prop assemblies are SCARY.

    7.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    Wow! Really cool!

    7.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    13.8k vonhubert

    well, guys, i ve noticed a mistake - there is a redundant air inlet below the left engine - please delete it if playing this model.

    8.2 years ago