Profile image

Rambojutter Skyfalcon 4.3

232k RamboJutter  3.8 years ago
2 downloads
Unlisted No Tags

Introduction

With the introduction of the A4 Sjyhawk the Americans had a small fast airframe capable of carrying out a number of roles and complementing the larger aircraft also carried by the associated aircraft carriers (F14 etc). It was decided that the Royal Navy could benefit from such an aircraft so the Skyfalcon was developed.

Controls

AG1 = reheat
AG3 = arrestor hook
AG4 = drop tanks
AG5 = airbrake
AG6 = nav lights
AG7 = drogue shoot
VTOL dn = flaps

Pictures

1
2
3
4
5

General Characteristics

  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 29.4ft (8.9m)
  • Length 47.4ft (14.4m)
  • Height 17.7ft (5.4m)
  • Empty Weight 21,743lbs (9,862kg)
  • Loaded Weight 29,596lbs (13,424kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 2.733
  • Wing Loading 71.1lbs/ft2 (347.0kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 416.5ft2 (38.7m2)
  • Drag Points 1554

Parts

  • Number of Parts 1106
  • Control Surfaces 0
  • Performance Cost 4,223
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    16.5k edensk

    @RamboJutter you are criminally underrated, it's quite sad

    3.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @edensk 22 upvotes lol, never mind see what the next one brings .

    3.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @edensk cool ill have a look through this hopefully tomorrow. Thanks

    +1 3.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    16.5k edensk

    One last thing, the flaps don't seem to do anything, you could put the wing parts on a rotator set to 5 degrees to make them increase lift at less AoA

    3.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    16.5k edensk

    the ability to jettison the rocket pods would be nice, specially if having them increased drag

    3.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    16.5k edensk

    this thing goes mach 2.5+ at 35000 ft and accelerates through mach at 90 degrees, really needs less powerful engines

    3.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    16.5k edensk

    (btw, I'm just pointing out the bad stuff, the jet is amazing so far!)

    3.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    16.5k edensk

    fuel consumption should be more than doubled when using afterburner, right now it's slightly less than 1.5 times more
    I'd reduce the thrust of the entire engine by a bit, it accelerates too quickly when fully loaded

    3.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    16.5k edensk

    seondly, the front part of the lower pylon of both 3 pylon racks is rotated (thus asymmetrical

    3.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    16.5k edensk

    Just loaded it up, first thing I noticed is that you didn't use smooth, it shouldn't take more than half an hour and will greatly improve the looks

    3.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @edensk tell me about it... forum link here, going to have to finish some off lol.

    3.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    16.5k edensk

    sure! That's a lot of builds lol

    3.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @edensk do you want to cast your eye over this then? (I have 4 builds on unlisted ready to go... ) I also have another 10 or so nearly done, i just accumulate builds at present, i get them nearly there and then have a finishing splurge =)

    3.8 years ago

This post is unlisted and upvoting is disabled.