Profile image

Boeing Problems

39.6k JoeAdkinson13  5.6 years ago
17 downloads

Boeing "max" involved in two similar crashes recently, in an attempt to stay competitive with Airbus, Boeing wanted to install new engines on the Max line but learned that the engines they wanted would not safely install in the conventional location, Boeing engineers devised a plan that pushes the engines location forward and up. this changed the flight characteristic of aircraft, causing nose to pitch up under full throttle. Boeing countered this by installing sensors and software that would "automatically" push the nose of the aircraft down....the pilots were not properly trained by Boeing on this system...plane nose up, pilots pulled up, over and over until aircraft stalled..WOW nice work Boeing, and lets not forget the FAA who seemingly took Boeing's word on the safety of these aircraft....Greed, money over people's lives...I'd avoid this aircraft if it ever gets airborne again!

General Characteristics

  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 93.4ft (28.5m)
  • Length 90.8ft (27.7m)
  • Height 26.4ft (8.1m)
  • Empty Weight 65,387lbs (29,659kg)
  • Loaded Weight 68,559lbs (31,098kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 0.983
  • Wing Loading 214.2lbs/ft2 (1,045.7kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 320.1ft2 (29.7m2)
  • Drag Points 14712

Parts

  • Number of Parts 53
  • Control Surfaces 5
  • Performance Cost 382
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    18.2k exosuit

    @JoeAdkinson13 basically the same thing you posted
    .
    i thought they still mount the engines under the wing but i was mistaken lol
    .
    also is that YLVIS REFERENCE

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @exosuit
    What does the Vox say?

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    18.2k exosuit

    isn't that from Vox's video lol

    5.6 years ago