Su-30MWI
The Su-30MWI (NATO Reporting Name: Flanker J) is a twin-seater, multirole, heavy fighter derived from the Russian Sukhoi Su-30.
Development of the variant started 3 years after the collapse of the Soviet Union as an offer to supplant the older Su-27 Flanker in 1993.
The aircraft is tailor-made for Wright specifications with American and British avionics and radar and capable of using American and British Air-to-Air Missiles, Air-to-Ground missiles, as well and guided bombs
DEVELOPMENT
As a successor for the Su-27 Flanker-A, the newly formed Russian Federation offered the Su-30 to supplant the older Su-27.
A license of the first 102 aircraft was given in 1994, a full license and export approval was given in 1995.
The first 24 aircraft was delivered to the 35th Fighter group, replacing the older F-4E Phantom IIs used by the unit.
Two Su-30s flying together
OPERATIONAL HISTORY
FIRST TASTE OF COMBAT
48 Su-30s were deployed in Italy to participate in Operation Allied Force.
12 Su-30s escorted by French Mirage 2000s bombed a Republika Sprska ammo depot in Novi Sad. A Maywarian source claims one was shot down by a Serbian SA-1 SAM, the Air Force did not confirm the source although a Su-30 crashed 12 miles from Novi Sad.
The Su-30 was credited with 10 kills, 2 MiG-29s, 3 MiG-21s, 5 J-22 Orao LCAs but lost 3 aircraft from SAMs.
An Su-30 engaging an F-15G of the TFMGAC’s 7th Adversary Wing
MAYWARIAN CIVIL WAR
Upon the start of the civil war, WIAF Su-30s were used to conduct bombing and rocket strikes against al-Nusra targets.
One Su-30 was downed by MANPADs fire over Al-Janb province, both airmen were rescued
An Su-30 conducted an airstrike in an al-Nusra tunnel complex resulting in a death of a commander and several more insurgents.
FIRST TFM-DARKCORP CONFLICT
Although the Wright maintained neutrality throughout the first conflict. The Maywarian Air Force used the Su-30 in defense of the desert nation.
4 were lost from enemy fire.
According to declassified OSI documents, at least 23 Darkcorp Aircraft were shot down.
On the October 13th Incident, 3 Darkcorp MiG-29s were shot down by WIAF Su-30s.
SECOND TFM-DARKCORP CONFLICT
Su-30s of the Federation of Atlantic Island Nations defended off waves of aerial attacks by Darkcorp International in the opening months of the war.
Su-30s were used as interdictors by the WIAF, 67 are lost in these operations.
86 aircraft were shot down during the attempted invasion of Darkcorp International of the FAIN but losing 56.
EXPORT
Maywar
Maywar is the first international customer for the Su-30. Maywar purchased 48 Su-30s in 2004. Deliveries were complete by 2006.
Another 48 were bought in 2006.
4 were shot down during the Siege of Maywar.
13 were lost in the Second TFM-Darkcorp Conflict
45 aircraft were shot down by Maywarian Su-30s
Krakabloa
34 were ordered in 2005 with another 56 ordered in 2008.
15 were lost during the Second TFM-Darkcorp Conflict
56 Aircraft were shot down by Krakabloan Su-30s.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
The United States Air Force and the United States Navy purchased 143 units in 2001 to train both Navy and Air Force pilots to fight Russian Aircraft.
ACCIDENTS
12 aircraft were lost due to accidents
Controls:
AG1 = activities TVC or PSM mode
AG2 = air brake
AG3 = Refueling probe
AG7 = open canopy
VTOL= flaps
Specifications
Spotlights
- This craft is curated
- Username2 2.1 years ago
- FujiwaraAutoShop 2.1 years ago
- ShinyGemsBro 2.1 years ago
- ShootsPlanes 2.1 years ago
- Bo1233 2.1 years ago
- DISHWASHER2005 2.1 years ago
- Sakorsky 2.1 years ago
- Otana 2.1 years ago
- FalcoOne 2.1 years ago
- DC10AirTanker914 2.1 years ago
- PriyanshuGM 2.1 years ago
- NARGII 2.1 years ago
General Characteristics
- Predecessor Su-30MKM
- Successors 1 airplane(s)
- Created On Android
- Wingspan 48.5ft (14.8m)
- Length 72.7ft (22.2m)
- Height 20.3ft (6.2m)
- Empty Weight N/A
- Loaded Weight 27,406lbs (12,431kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 28.782
- Wing Loading 29.2lbs/ft2 (142.7kg/m2)
- Wing Area 937.8ft2 (87.1m2)
- Drag Points 13125
Parts
- Number of Parts 384
- Control Surfaces 4
- Performance Cost 2,434
People, people...
.
Please keep the comments civil. There is no reason to bash the author. If you think it breaks the rules, report it and move on. Like it or not, the author has the right to remove your comments.
.
That being said...
The complaints do have merit. While I don't think this is misleading intentionally to the point of breaking the rules, I definitely do understand the concerns. I understand the thumbnail is an artistic render of the build, but it cannot be ignored that some key features have been altered to improve or change the appearance. This could be interpreted as misleading for some. I think this is in a grey area of what is allowed and what isn't. While I don't think it will be removed for now, please be more considerate in the future, and create thumbnails that more accurately reflect the build.
.
In addition, please improve your attitude to the feedback. If you don't like what people say, block and report. There is no need for snarkly replies and passive aggressive comments. I hope you can demonstrate you are more mature than your replies suggest.
For all of you that are at hard trying to get this post taken down for a "misleading" thumbnail:
The picture is a digital artwork render of the actual plane. Nothing was largely changed and it's not misleading whatsoever. It's still the same jet.
.
Those who are claiming this to be the case need to have their eyes checked and mental state re-evaluated. Whatever you're accusing this post is just proof that you don't want it around just because it garnered more attention than whatever you made your entire life. People like it, let them like it. It's not that hard to understand.
.
If you're still bitter about this damn plane getting a ton of attention despite it being a repaint with a few modifications, please. Do us all a favor and cry yourselves to sleep, then get over it the next day. Thank you.
Credits:
@Farewellchii
@Phox
@GuianLorenzo
Screenshots
@OTANA
Profile pic
@Aghsan22
Base Plane
@ORZpasserAtw Your point?
SUSSY SU-30
@ReignSUPREME can't understand why not?!
Noice
@ReignSUPREME It's allowed as long as the build in question inside the render remains largely unchanged
@397blin You may have replied to the wrong person with that comment, or you're on the wrong post entirely. Either way, I have no idea what you're going on about.
@ShinyGemsBro true, oofington also credited them, so it is undisputed that the original maker allowed it to be used
@TWDDerSharkmarine No, I'm trying to show my presbyopian grandfather that it is flawless, but I failed
@TWDDerSharkmarine Otana made the thumbnail for him, and he has every right to use it. Possibly even a second time too. They even upvoted, so it's safe to say that they allowed it.
.
If you mean the jet, then the original was autocredited. Even Aghsan upvoted, meaning they approve of this.
@RolandTelmsFrossag supposed misleading thumbnail, there's a difference
@TWDDerSharkmarine So you also think this cover is misleading! Hello, comrade in arms!LOL
have to say mod are doing more wrongly these years😂
Nice!
@BaconAircraft https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/Sy2OVo/Su-30MKM
@MrOofington Provide a link please.
HELL YEAAAA THIS LOOKS GOOOOD MATEEEE
@BaconAircraft Hi, would you like to make this a successor to Aghsan22's Su-30MKM? Thanks in advance