Profile image

ME-66 "Peto"

8,565 Thueerra  4.4 years ago
Auto Credit Based on MAHADI's WWII Jets Challenge! (CLOSED)

In year of 1942 Messerschmitt's best engineers hit up their head with the best of finnish air force guys!

Outcome was one prototype of ME-66, codename "Peto" (Beast).

They started all over, from empty table and brought all their crazy ideas together.
ME-66 received very strange aerodynamics and control systems, which are not optimized in prototype.

Only two crazy finnish pilots were willing to test it..

"Peto" was armed with two 7.62mm MG, two 75mm Autocannons and 6x Anti tank rockets.

ME-66 didn't see real fights since germany surrendered and only prototype built was scrapped because new, better jets were introduced.

AG7 drag chute

Otherwise basic controls.

(this is meant to be kinda clumsy plane since WW2 jets and for sure prototypes were funky!)

Hope u enjoy!

this is completely fiction

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor WWII Jets Challenge! (CLOSED)
  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 25.8ft (7.9m)
  • Length 32.5ft (9.9m)
  • Height 11.2ft (3.4m)
  • Empty Weight 11,261lbs (5,108kg)
  • Loaded Weight 16,688lbs (7,569kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 0.807
  • Wing Loading 37.6lbs/ft2 (183.4kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 444.3ft2 (41.3m2)
  • Drag Points 3277

Parts

  • Number of Parts 239
  • Control Surfaces 7
  • Performance Cost 970
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    156k MAHADI

    @Thueerra I get it. no problem! but please mention that in the description next time, that would help.

    +1 4.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    8,565 Thueerra

    @MAHADI i can provide you explanation how they could have been made wwii era, even with pictures if you want so!

    4.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    8,565 Thueerra

    @MAHADI well if they had mechanisms to use them and give more power to control surfaces, it would have been possible if anyone just knew or thought about streamlined control surfaces! There is so many ways to make it happen, for real in WWII era but since i didnt explain precisely my idea or the mechanics, it is completely up to you what you are gonna do with my entry! No hard feelings you know?

    4.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    156k MAHADI

    @Thueerra hatches and bomb bay doors can not be compared with control surfaces. because control surfaces are aerodynamic.

    +1 4.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    8,565 Thueerra

    @MAHADI yeah i thought about that too but then i thought, there were hatches and bomb bay doors etc. So in my own opinion, it is not too fictional! But ofc, you are the judge and you decide!

    4.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    156k MAHADI

    this plane is way too fictional. I don't think there were control surfaces like this back in the WWII era.

    +1 4.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    156k MAHADI

    RATING

    Looks : 8.5/10 pts.
    Performance : 6.75/10 pts.
    Details : 8/10 pts.
    Weaponry : 9/10 pts.
    Functionality : 6/10 pts.

    OVERALL RATING : 7.65/10

    4.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    8,565 Thueerra

    @Aztop033 Thank you!

    4.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    Very cool friend! Very cool!

    +1 4.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    8,565 Thueerra

    @SledDriver @Frenchguyn666 @Locurapuntocom Thank you guys!! (^_^)

    4.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    Wow, it's strange, massive, but nice.

    +2 4.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    197k SledDriver

    Very cool.

    +1 4.4 years ago