With a suspension so wobbly that it won't hurt eggs. Just like the Citroen 2CV.
The top would rotate if the physics were any realistic, sadly they aren't. :D
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 38.3ft (11.7m)
- Length 38.3ft (11.7m)
- Height 24.8ft (7.6m)
- Empty Weight 8,382lbs (3,802kg)
- Loaded Weight 8,382lbs (3,802kg)
Performance
- Wing Loading 8.2lbs/ft2 (40.0kg/m2)
- Wing Area 1,022.6ft2 (95.0m2)
- Drag Points 10954
Parts
- Number of Parts 79
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 582
@Tully2001 No problem. :D Actually I was just waiting for someone to think I was using wings instead of structural panels. You can only see the difference in the editor (by the name of the part), when testing and in the XML.
@Tully2001 In the XML you can see it very easily. Structural wings and structural panels are both Wing-2, both have control surfaces disabled, but the structural panels also have wing physics disabled. The normal wings with control surfaces are all Wing-3. SP will calculate the wing area and wing loading no matter which type of those it is.
@Tully2001 Nope, those are very thin fuselage pieces. Structural panels/wings are way thicker. :) He's also using the drag I assume.
@Tully2001 I could also use large fuselage pieces instead. I'm only using the drag to slow down the fall and stabilize it.
@Tully2001 Because structural panels are basically wings, just with deactivated wing physics and deactivated control surfaces.
@Tully2001 Those are all structural panels. :)