Profile image

SR75A

50.4k Stingray  8.7 years ago
219 downloads
Auto Credit Based on Stingray's BEAST Slow Version

An aircraft that starts on a standard runway. With carefull piloting, it passes briefly through aero "soup" then leaves planet Earth. Standard takeoff & controls. Fly at 50,000 feet to 20,000 mph, dive down to 45,000 feet, then pull up at 56,000 mph. My iPod battery ran out at 5 million feet, still climbing.

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor BEAST Slow Version
  • Successors 1 airplane(s)
  • Created On iOS
  • Wingspan 45.7ft (13.9m)
  • Length 53.3ft (16.3m)
  • Height 13.3ft (4.1m)
  • Empty Weight 21,071lbs (9,557kg)
  • Loaded Weight 52,529lbs (23,826kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 2.823
  • Wing Loading 104.7lbs/ft2 (511.4kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 501.5ft2 (46.6m2)
  • Drag Points 6035

Parts

  • Number of Parts 102
  • Control Surfaces 8
  • Performance Cost 646
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    50.4k Stingray

    Thanks! Also, with this speed+control, I flew this to discover the "hidden" islands on Jundroo -- there are at least 2 more islands, and slow planes cannot see them easily. @Luxray0

    8.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    232 Luxray0

    very fast

    8.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    50.4k Stingray

    @Delphinus In full disclosure, the iPod I built & tested this model with uses an A9X chip. Almost the same speed as my quad-core i7 desktop (which I use for business, not gaming.) My iPhone testing has too slow "fps" for controlled flight at 50,000 mph, but once the thrusters are on the model still exceeds 5 million feet. My Android platform testing is about the same as the iPhone's. In sum, this post is meant to push Jundroo physics to the limit; yet that can only be done on fairly fast platforms.

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Stingray yep

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    50.4k Stingray

    Since more downloads of this item are occurring than I can track on a simple mobile, I guess I need to build a faster model. @PlanesAndThings @Himynameiswalrus @Jacobhardy64 @Delphinus @Steadfastcontracting @SUPERSAMROCK @Frant24

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    50.4k Stingray

    @Frant24 I appreciate your testing of a complex model, thank you for an upvote.

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    50.4k Stingray

    @Delphinus Not annoyed.

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    50.4k Stingray

    @Delphinus Agree, above 100,000 feet the thrusters overpower any flight control. That's another SP SIM benchmark, in altitude. If you surpass it you'll be on thrust alone. Little control and goodbye Earth.

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    50.4k Stingray

    @Delphinus Observation: current SP flight "physics" have a gap in aero performance between 41,000 - 49,000 feet. Dive from above, pull up quickly and maybe your 26,000 model's could double the speed.

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    Np!

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    50.4k Stingray

    Thanks, @SUPERSAMROCK

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    50.4k Stingray

    Thanks, @Steadfastcontracting

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Stingray no problem

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    50.4k Stingray

    Thank you, @Himynameiswalrus

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    50.4k Stingray

    Thank you, @PlanesAndThings

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    50.4k Stingray

    Thank you, @JacobHardy64

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    50.4k Stingray

    Thx, this was fun to build! @Delphinus

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.2k JacobHardy64

    Jesus Christ

    8.7 years ago