Profile image

Caproni Ca.36 1916

6,499 XVIindustries  9.1 years ago

Remake of one of my classics, :) cam 1 is observer and front gunner, move gun with 1-VTOL cam 2 is Pilot cam 3 is co pilot and bombardier, cam 4 is engineer mechanic/rear gunner, move gun with 2-VTOL drop 500ibs bombs with 3-6 cam 5 is on bomb 3 to check trajectory.

THIS PLANE IS VERY SLOW AND IS HARD TO TAKE OFF AND LAND

Please don't try and take off from a tiny runway, this is a bomber -_- ;)

WILL NOT WORK ON MOBILE WITHOUT MILLIONS OF LAGS

I haven't actually tested it because if the above reason ;)

Lovingly created by PlanesOfOld

ENJOY! :)
Sorry for the blank screenshot I couldn't get it to upload otherwise :) but it makes it more of a surprise

General Characteristics

  • Created On iOS
  • Wingspan 75.2ft (22.9m)
  • Length 40.7ft (12.4m)
  • Height 12.9ft (3.9m)
  • Empty Weight 10,455lbs (4,742kg)
  • Loaded Weight 28,185lbs (12,784kg)

Performance

  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.026
  • Wing Loading 14.9lbs/ft2 (72.9kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 1,888.8ft2 (175.5m2)
  • Drag Points 7773

Parts

  • Number of Parts 495
  • Control Surfaces 10
  • Performance Cost 1,674
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    3,690 LjSpike

    @XVIindustries @WalrusAircraft would one of you do a post on the Reddit. I do one on the forums then.

    9.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    Both m8 @LjSpike

    9.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    3,690 LjSpike

    @WalrusAircraft subreddit or the forums...which would you say I should do it on.

    9.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @LjSpike - you should make a request on the subreddit.

    9.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    3,690 LjSpike

    @WalrusAircraft well I'm on iOS so I can't mod :*( but it would be nice, they could do a separate fusilage part with ONLY buoyancy and floatability!

    9.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @LjSpike @XVIindustries - you can mod a fuel tank to be negative weight, and a plane near zero pounds, but it causes the game to freak out.

    9.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    3,690 LjSpike

    @XVIindustries @WalrusAircraft I wish we had floating parts, then we could have zeppelins with big big balloons! -I'd so want that, plus antigravity would be far easier-

    9.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    Thx, the earl one had lower HP engines than this and this is faster than it lol, the real one's top speed was only 85, and cruising was about 70, they had to fly in large formations to stay safe, that's why ww1 bombers usually ahve tons of guns, I believe the fastest bombers were handly page 0/1000's and the slowest bombers were actually the zeppelins, some only reaching speeds of 20mph and taking hours to reach their target, they are awesome tho :) anyways! Good day! @WalrusAircraft

    9.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    Good job bud! I love the amount of detail you put on this thing! But I would like to point out the speed of the bomber. I understand most WW1 bombers where sky turtles, but it would be nice to have a bit more speed. That said, we both love what you did and encourage you to keep making amazing older planes.

    9.1 years ago