Profile image

Back to SimplePlanes again

12.2k lancelot3340  6.3 years ago
125 downloads
Auto Credit Based on Jundroo's P-51 Mustang

I just built a replica of the cover mustang, and that is a very beautiful plane that everyone likes. You know what, to build a simple plane isn't easier than a complicate one, especially the proportion and the 3-views were very hard to get it right. For me,No proportion means nothing even you put tons of decorations on it.

Let's back to the SimplePlanes again!

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor P-51 Mustang
  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 32.4ft (9.9m)
  • Length 27.0ft (8.2m)
  • Height 11.4ft (3.5m)
  • Empty Weight 3,714lbs (1,684kg)
  • Loaded Weight 3,922lbs (1,779kg)

Performance

  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.254
  • Wing Loading 17.3lbs/ft2 (84.5kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 226.5ft2 (21.0m2)
  • Drag Points 1486

Parts

  • Number of Parts 33
  • Control Surfaces 7
  • Performance Cost 234
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    wow

    9 months ago
  • Profile image

    YEEEEEAEAAAH

    11 months ago
  • Profile image

    BUILD YOUR OWN PLANE FROM SCRATCH

    +2 2.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.1k dINE

    Back to SP? Damn ur brave 💪

    +2 4.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    This is what I live for

    +1 6.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.2k lancelot3340

    @Zippy6 I'm searching it for quite a long time.

    +1 6.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.2k lancelot3340

    @Dllama4 Less is more, you know

    +1 6.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.2k lancelot3340

    @Dllama4 in fact if you build it like exactly the same as the original one is difficult, and I didn't make it either

    +1 6.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    18.9k Zippy6

    I always wondered if sometone actually built this. It is called SIMPLE planes after all.

    +1 6.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,191 Topfighter

    Your right, its a beautiful plane

    +1 6.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    104k Dllama4

    What makes this as difficult to build as something more complicated?

    +1 6.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.2k lancelot3340

    @Benderisgreta123 sorry I can't speak English very well.

    +1 6.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.2k lancelot3340

    @Benderisgreta123 I agree your opinion,I just wish everyone put more effort on propotion. people who ajust the size of parts with 0.005 width/height little by little ,and rotate a part with 0.01 degrees ,they made bigger effort on those invisible things, that's much more difficult than stacking decorations, but nobody can see it, that's not fair.

    +1 6.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.2k lancelot3340

    @Benderisgreta123 I don't mean that was wrong to make details, the key I said was before we built the details, we need to fix the proportion first , then we start to add some details. you know what, I built a Su-27 for half of a year to make the features right,and kept the part number under 100. I'm not lazy, but I don't like those planes gots only decorations to defraud our upvotes.

    +1 6.3 years ago