Profile image

SR-72 'Darkstar'

5,092 Adelweis  2.3 years ago
532 downloads
No Tags

Unfortunately thete's no front view from the Blueprint.

is it Darkstar or Son of Blackbird? why there's 2 model of SR-72 Blueprint? i don't know she haven't show herself and i haven't watch Top Gun yet.

This is a request from @JakeTheAviationTeen.

I tried my best to make it looks like the real one, please give Critics and Suggest.

and no, the request is closed. i have like 50 aircraft, vehicle or ship to make. and i pretty tired of making plane.

And yes she can go up to Mach 5

General Characteristics

  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 43.8ft (13.3m)
  • Length 96.0ft (29.3m)
  • Height 17.3ft (5.3m)
  • Empty Weight 30,395lbs (13,786kg)
  • Loaded Weight 93,911lbs (42,597kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 11.988
  • Wing Loading 86.9lbs/ft2 (424.1kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 1,081.1ft2 (100.4m2)
  • Drag Points 10300

Parts

  • Number of Parts 45
  • Control Surfaces 5
  • Performance Cost 604
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    0 Hadrk

    @LittleAircraft also yeah the usaf and there "scram jets" and the "darkstar" it's really all just a cover up for the aurora

    2.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    0 Hadrk

    @Rangertochina the darkstar was a real 1:1 scale model it wasn't cgi the only thing cgi was it flying

    2.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Adelweis sr 72 designers maybe dont know what sr 72 must use

    +1 2.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    5,092 Adelweis

    @LittleAircraft what the hell, i just confused which one is the real SR-72. Because Wikipedia use a picture of SR-72 that have this shape, But it looks different from the Top Gun one. So i don't know bro. Read the description. She haven't show herself to this world

    +1 2.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    thats why ppl are getting confused

    +1 2.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    there are 2 types of sr-72 darkstar the one that played in top gun and the yours one

    +1 2.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    what the heck dude a lgbt supporter

    +1 2.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Rangertochina no duh the US Air Force wouldn’t just advertise a top secret Mach 10 capable vehicle (and its destruction) in a blockbuster movie. I mean Lockheed Martin does actually have a UAVproject called darkstar but it hasn’t been built

    +3 2.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    @asteroidbook345 I think it was cgi in the movie

    +2 2.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Rangertochina I think the dark star was also a real unmanned thing but it wasn’t the SR-72

    +2 2.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    @asteroidbook345 Adding on, dark star is entirely fictional while the SR-72 is a real concept being worked on by Lockheed Martin although, dark star was made in cooperation with skunk works

    +2 2.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    Thanks buddy I love that @Adelweis

    +2 2.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    5,092 Adelweis

    @Brayden1981 the hell 146 part, that just a livery, what about the plane? The plane it self can have 60-80 part and that's not included window. Huh fine dammit, i will make it

    +1 2.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    Oops I meant @RealSavageMan go to pg 3 @Adelweis

    +1 2.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    5,092 Adelweis

    @Brayden1981 then what?

    +1 2.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    Umm look at Astroids’ profile @Adelweis

    +1 2.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    The actual SR-72 is unmanned and the one in top gun was manned. It’s not an SR-72 but it’s got the Lockheed Martin logo on it

    +3 2.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    5,092 Adelweis

    @Brayden1981 What? I clearly not a commercial plane maker. And the Alaska Air have a hard image in it's rudder.

    +1 2.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    You quitting

    +1 2.3 years ago