Trench Runner 2.0
10.9k bspboy
8.3 years ago
No Tags
Auto Credit Based on bspboy's Trench Runner
The overall look of my buggy has stayed, but i have been working hard to fine tune all of the settings for suspension and traction. It now handles much better and is fun to drive on or off the road. Enjoy! (VTOL up to flip back onto your feet)
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Predecessor Trench Runner
- Successors 2 airplane(s) +48 bonus
- Created On iOS
- Wingspan 15.3ft (4.7m)
- Length 23.0ft (7.0m)
- Height 9.0ft (2.7m)
- Empty Weight 4,636lbs (2,103kg)
- Loaded Weight 4,636lbs (2,103kg)
Performance
- Wing Loading 439,839.3lbs/ft2 (2,147,483.6kg/m2)
- Wing Area 0.0ft2 (0.0m2)
- Drag Points 4797
Parts
- Number of Parts 115
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 588
Bsp go check that =)
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/onENa7/Rock-crawler-new
Rear tire negines. 275HP. 2 front engines. 125HP. all springs all settings 100%. traction settings. manual. rear wheels : 100% forwards 150% side ways. front: 50% forwards. 100% sideways. and just have both front wheels set to the same engine. thats what I tested and was good. you'd have too much power again. (and don't removei t you want more weight as it is) it may seem a bit slow but in an actuall off road senerio its pretty fast.
So reduce horse power as well as reducing spring strength? @Typhlosion130
@bspboy Ok a few major things. 1: it has a bit to much engine power for how light weight it is. 2 the supension is too stiff it bounces way it high on bumps
@bspboy give me a few minutes to test it. I"m modifying one of my designs for a new track.
How do you think it handles? @Typhlosion130
@bspboy oh lol.
Go mobile! Can't. @Typhlosion130
Have you tried it on the new race tracks in the beta?