Profile image

B-Moth Y [prototype II]

17.8k jsaret  8.9 years ago
Auto Credit Based on jsaret's B-Moth Y

New Features:
= opening cargo bay as suggested by @Sirstupid
- use AG-1 and VTOL UP [not down!]
- maybe don't fly while its open, maybe its ok.
= Added B-Moth octagon insignia to the side.
- a subassembly of this insignia is available upon request.

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor B-Moth Y
  • Successors 1 airplane(s) +72 bonus
  • Created On Mac
  • Wingspan 67.0ft (20.4m)
  • Length 82.1ft (25.0m)
  • Height 30.4ft (9.3m)
  • Empty Weight 13,492lbs (6,119kg)
  • Loaded Weight 72,289lbs (32,789kg)

Performance

  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.055
  • Wing Loading 28.5lbs/ft2 (139.2kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 2,535.6ft2 (235.6m2)
  • Drag Points 23365

Parts

  • Number of Parts 251
  • Control Surfaces 4
  • Performance Cost 1,007
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    17.8k jsaret

    @Sirstupid ah, I see now what you meant. Thanks!

    8.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    9,180 LT556
    8.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    17.8k jsaret

    @Sirstupid you have to link the URL to the actual plane, linking it to the "successor" page doesn't do it. It's unlisted, after all.

    8.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    9,180 LT556
    8.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    17.8k jsaret

    @Sirstupid link me?

    8.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    9,180 LT556

    Got it. @jsaret

    8.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    9,180 LT556

    Okay, I'll try to do that. @jsaret

    8.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    17.8k jsaret

    @Sirstupid could you post that in an unlisted or something?

    8.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    9,180 LT556

    Coming down to a point of size four.

    8.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    9,180 LT556

    Try triangular stabilizers, horizontal at 126°, vertical at 134° @jsaret

    8.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    17.8k jsaret

    @Sirstupid it's still unstable, at any speed. Any ideas?

    8.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    17.8k jsaret

    Done and I'm getting called to dinner. Back shortly

    8.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    17.8k jsaret

    Works, but I also did a six-blade with T3000s. Gimme a sec to post it, and I'll link it here.

    8.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    9,180 LT556

    @jsaret This is close enogh, right...?

    8.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    17.8k jsaret

    I see. Same here except I can't. Do you know of any already in existence?

    8.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    9,180 LT556

    @jsaret I can but I don't.

    8.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    17.8k jsaret

    @Sirstupid do you XML? An 8 blade would be...fitting.

    8.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    9,180 LT556

    @jsaret At six blades and 2.1 thickness it's more stable and faster.

    8.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    17.8k jsaret

    @Sirstupid biplane...? Also six-blades would be a good idea. It's kinda slow.

    8.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    9,180 LT556

    @jsaret Don't make it a biplane. Also I'm going to go try i with six-bladed props.

    8.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    17.8k jsaret

    @Sirstupid haha. The plane seems to be a bit wobbly in general. Any thoughts based on your tests?

    8.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    9,180 LT556

    @jsaret Well, pitch goes haywire but it's otherwise fine. As long as you don't need to do wimpy stuff like "pull up" and "land" you should be fine.

    8.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    9,180 LT556

    @jsaret I'll do that.

    8.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    17.8k jsaret

    @Sirstupid LOL they are structural panels. Shouldn't affect anything, but change them for regular/structural wings and tell me what happens :D

    8.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    9,180 LT556

    Love the cargo doors! I'm going to go fly with them open now.

    8.9 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments