Profile image

BAC THREE - ELEVEN

53.2k Tang0five  3.1 years ago

BAC Three - Eleven


Here’s a little something I stumbled on whilst making my BAC One-Eleven a while back. That puts a time frame on things if your wondering why there is a lack of 1.11 features. The lettering and stripes down the fuselage were just to much of a pain to get rid of!

Controls

AG 1&2 - engine 1&2
AG 3 - Cabin lighting
AG 8 - Nav lights
(Landing gear also activates landing lights)

Background

BACs proposed Three-Eleven was essentially a wide bodied version of the successful one-Eleven with mid to long range routes in mind.

Banded about the pipe-smoke-filled rooms of BACs design bureau around the late 60s, the proposal never left the drawing board amidst competition, the usual political meddling and domestic carrier indecision. As a result of this being a drawing board replica I’ve given this build generic wide body performance of the period.

Now to get to grips with the new update!

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 144.4ft (44.0m)
  • Length 202.4ft (61.7m)
  • Height 45.2ft (13.8m)
  • Empty Weight N/A
  • Loaded Weight 154,813lbs (70,222kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 0.696
  • Wing Loading 23.8lbs/ft2 (116.1kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 6,512.5ft2 (605.0m2)
  • Drag Points 31175

Parts

  • Number of Parts 472
  • Control Surfaces 7
  • Performance Cost 2,085
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    53.2k Tang0five

    Thank you always bud! @Trainzo

    3.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    42.8k Trainzo

    Very nice deco . Great build .

    +1 3.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    53.2k Tang0five

    You’re most kind for spotlighting @RicardoAs1515 once again!

    3.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Tang0five No problem bro. ;) And I can see why you chose the 3-11 :)

    3.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    53.2k Tang0five

    Thank you kindly @Boeing777x Both the 2-11 and 3-11 proposals caught my attention but the 3-11 seemed more ambitious so I cracked on with this one.

    3.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    Ooooh, I've actually seen this interesting concept quite a few times before. And it's great to finally see this plane on SimplePlanes. Excellent job, bro. ;)

    +2 3.1 years ago