Profile image

M.Corp C-2 Van

245k EternalDarkness  7.3 years ago
1,991 downloads

A sideproject I made to test a new (for me) way of making fuselage wings. It flies pretty well, and has good STOL performance. I didn't feel like finishing it, but it's not bad enough to be scrapped.

M.Corp C-2 Van is a primary tactical transport aircraft, designed to haul troops and equipment on short distances. Cheap to produce and maintain, it is present in large numbers.

Controls:
-Standard controls;
-VTOL for flaps.

General Characteristics

  • Successors 2 airplane(s) +7 bonus
  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 75.8ft (23.1m)
  • Length 56.5ft (17.2m)
  • Height 19.1ft (5.8m)
  • Empty Weight N/A
  • Loaded Weight 11,303lbs (5,127kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 0.596
  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.53
  • Wing Loading 11.7lbs/ft2 (56.9kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 969.4ft2 (90.1m2)
  • Drag Points 18279

Parts

  • Number of Parts 339
  • Control Surfaces 0
  • Performance Cost 1,149
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    @SheriffHackdogMCPE that's fine. You may note in the description that I have approved, in case some other mod with stricter view of copies comes by.

    +1 3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    OK imma respect your opinion
    I modified them with my official paint for the air force, with the air force logo in the wing, body and rudder and Krakabloan flag in rudder and nose but yes I'm uploading it

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @SheriffHackdogMCPE I don't want to participate in any RP. You may use my builds for it if the rules allow, but I will not actively participate and you may not post my builds to your account unless they are significantly modified.

    +1 3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    Anyway I converted this into one of my air assets of my fictional Krakabloan Air Defence. (Yeah its for my country rp called SimplePlanes Forum RP and my country is Krakabloan Federation) Would you like if I can make you part of my role playing and ill request military aircraft? Thanks

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @EternalDarkness thanks!

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @SheriffHackdogMCPE it's an old build that wasn't quite up to my standard even then. I don't think I'll put any more work into it. You can fix it for your own pleasure if you like it.

    +1 3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @EternalDarkness Rudder doesn't work plz fix
    (Sorry for tag)

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    17.2k Hawkeye156

    @EternalDarkness im also buidling something like that but much better

    6.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Redstreak45 you have to make Gravatar account

    7.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    @EternalDarkness yeah and hey how do I change my profile picture without going through the stupid system. Off topic I know but I have a really good one.

    7.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Redstreak45 lol

    7.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    it's like a baby c130

    7.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    77.9k Cedy117

    Forgot to Upvote after i tested

    7.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    55.4k Beefy

    @EternalDarkness i know dude 😂

    7.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Alienbeef0421 side project. I couldn't make myself delete that cute face (front view), and building it was too fun, so I uploaded it. I didn't leave room for details, as I wasn't planning to add any when I started it.

    7.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    55.4k Beefy

    Stock gear.

    D A N K T O P K E K

    7.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Planefun no problem

    7.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Yellow lol, you are a third person to tell me that

    7.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Planefun thank you. I understand that maintaining a plane costs a lot. However, you will notice the difference in manufacture and maintenance costs between Russian and American planes, for example. Let's say, you don't design brand new electronics for a plane like this. Its role doesn't require it. Take stuff from already existing planes, reprogram it for this plane's specs, and you have part commonality. Also, you can use cheaper components, due to them not being under a lot of stress. For engines, you use cheapest you can find or produce that will give high enough power output, which further reduces costs. If you already have those on another plane, that lowers development costs, and thus, production costs. Use all the parts that you already have, that fit on this plane, to further reduce costs. If you have a same fuel valve on ten widely used planes, you can mass produce it, making it a lot cheaper than if it was made on order. There are many cost-reducing measures one can take, that could, theoretically, lower the price of a plane by as much as 30%, and maintenance by 20%. Of course, I'm not really an expert on this, and this is stuff I got from my knowledge of how manufacturing works, and some internet research.

    7.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Planefun yeah, but this one would be cheaper to maintain than a comparable plane of, let's say, US origin. Cheaper parts, simplified mechanisms, more durable components. Cost is, of course, weight penalty.

    7.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    120 Mentos

    @EternalDarkness Thanks!

    7.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    @EternalDarkness sure

    7.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Mentos Overload mod and Fine Tuner mod. They help a lot with building. They take some getting used to, but are necessary for small details.

    7.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    147k Pilotmario

    The Paternian Special Operations Command and Information Control would like to procure some for =shady business= logistics and training.

    7.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    120 Mentos

    Great stability! How did you get the parts so thin?

    7.3 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments