Profile image

Lawn-Dart-That-Is-Not-A-Dart (trademark needed)

18.8k NexusGaming  6.9 years ago
Auto Credit Based on MEERKAT978's Tactical Deletion Challenge [CLOSED]

Minimalist entry,don't expect Su-57 maneuverability,it's minimalist,remember?

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor Tactical Deletion Challenge [CLOSED]
  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 24.0ft (7.3m)
  • Length 27.1ft (8.3m)
  • Height 9.8ft (3.0m)
  • Empty Weight N/A
  • Loaded Weight 5,575lbs (2,529kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 1.209
  • Wing Loading 28.3lbs/ft2 (138.1kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 197.1ft2 (18.3m2)
  • Drag Points 2294

Parts

  • Number of Parts 60
  • Control Surfaces 5
  • Performance Cost 424
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    3,839 MEERKAT978

    @dootdootbananabus fair enough, it still terrified me to (try and) fly however.

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    102k Kerbango

    @dootdootbananabus I beat you on the trademark issue.
    And there are a lot of other planes named lawn dart as well FYI.

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    18.8k NexusGaming

    @MEERKAT978 this is supposed to handle like that,I bet the a10 and su25 have the same maneuverability

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    314k Gestour

    100/100 for choice of designer background.

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    3,839 MEERKAT978

    Okay then...
    LOOKS: Not too bad but not exactly a flying artwork. 5/10
    HANDLING: I understand why the ailerons are as big as they are, but especially on high physics they make the aircraft almost suicidally difficult to fly, couple that with very little pitch authority and... 6/20

    SURVIVABILITY: The aforementioned handling, coupled with a lack of C/Meas, would probably earn this aircraft a nickname like "Lawn Dart". At least its offensive A-A and A-S weapons are powerful enough to hit back. 4/10

    FUNCTIONALITY: Nothing much to write home about, other than the aircraft working and being (barely) flyable. 3/10

    WEAPONS DELIVERY No issues. 45/50.

    TOTAL: 63/100
    Simplistic, but capable of the job at hand. A little less aileron responsiveness and a little more onus on surviving would be nice too, though.

    +2 6.9 years ago