Profile image

encargoda cargo-5 "BIG PIG"

59.7k PapaKernels  4.1 years ago
56 downloads

this is the encargoda cargo 5 for the cargo challenge

history

The encargoda cargo 5 was the work horse for the checkered republics military from the mid 1970s up to the present. The cargo capacity was quite good for the republics purposes and for their often small, tight remote runways. This often carried ammunition, weapons, and other supplies to small runways to the troops on the ground. What's shown is the very first model, but other versions were also made, like cargo-5-B, C, And cargo-5D "ball buster" variants. The cargo 5D was the gunship version which came with two, mendak a120 auto-cannons, and 2 endo 134 Gatling guns. It was a very powerful gunship, and was given the nickname "ball buster" by the troops it saved in battle.

engines

4 werdon ma99-123pt mk12 engines

controls

Normal flight controls
Vtol up- open cargo door
Trim- trim
Throttle- throttle

fetures

Opening rear section for cargo
4 engines
LandingGear
(Yea ok there's really nothing special about this)

gallery


Builders note: needs quite a bit of trim, and if you need to make a fast corner use the cargo door, it will help the pitch authority tremendously, just don't use alot, maybe just barely off of its neutral position

thanks to those who upvote, comment, and follow

papakernels 11/9/2020

General Characteristics

  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 104.2ft (31.8m)
  • Length 97.2ft (29.6m)
  • Height 26.8ft (8.2m)
  • Empty Weight 33,488lbs (15,190kg)
  • Loaded Weight 56,490lbs (25,623kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 4.773
  • Wing Loading 140.4lbs/ft2 (685.3kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 402.4ft2 (37.4m2)
  • Drag Points 34832

Parts

  • Number of Parts 71
  • Control Surfaces 5
  • Performance Cost 679
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    30.0k TriStar

    yeah i made a tail opening cargo bay like what kernels did once @FeiWu

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    7,446 FeiWu

    @PapaKernels ok but it is still possible in some cases to preserve realism while keeping the fun factor xD

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    59.7k PapaKernels

    @FeiWu well I didn't know any of these things. Like I said before I dont know as much as you do, so I just make what I think looks good and realistic. I'm not as informed on this as you so I had no idea the indescepencies with the design. I figured the rear door would have been un realistic but it is not something that has been done before. I realize this is for constructive criticism but again this is stuff I'm not as informed about as you may be. I like to make things that looks cool, and can be fun to fly, sometimes realism is sacrificed for this fun factor. It's just my style.

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    7,446 FeiWu

    @KnightOfRen sorry I just accidentally clicked "reply" xD

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    41.8k Ren

    @FeiWu
    Why the hell was I tagged?

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    7,446 FeiWu

    @PapaKernels

    Some obvious flaws with the design:

    I mean, I hope this criticism is constructive.
    1. Are you sure you want to lift all those fragile hydraulics and avionics and control surfaces up there in the tail? Tail cargo doors are usually just a ramp.
    2. What can you fit in a cabin with a 4m height? I mean, this is a quad jet. The engines are overkill too.
    3. Why do you have the horizontal stabs halfway up the vertical stab? I mean, not everything in aviation is about looking cool and unique. The B-1 has this weird configuration for a reason.
    4. I appreciate the cockpit skylight, but because of the size of the plane as previously mentioned, this vision range from the cockpit would be worthy of breaking every single one of the loosest regulations in existence. I'm sorry, but ILS and automated landings is obviously not available for the small airfields this plane is supposed to fly to, and automated takeoffs are illegal in all circumstances.
    5. The excessively low wing sweep=bad
    6. Engines sooooooo close to each other=bad
    7. Engine intakes placed under wing=bad
    8. Wing loading=bad
    (aim for 40-70lb/ft^2 next time)
    9. too low wing aspect ratio=bad
    I mean, is this a glider?


    I think you should learn from the mistakes and be willing to accept constructive criticism.

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    59.7k PapaKernels

    @ACEPILOT109 I fixed the issue, then I didn't. I'll make a private and see if you can fix it. Sometimes it blows up and sometimes it doesn't

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @PapaKernels
    not sure what would cause that, but id take a look

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    59.7k PapaKernels

    @ACEPILOT109 so I'm making a bomber for a challenge and I'm trying to get the bomb release mechanism to work and I got it to work but when the Bombs hit the ground it doesn't explode. I'm using detatchers and I had the air to ground menu open. Do you know what I did wrong or help me in any way?

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    Mhm yes
    My interiors take like 20 years lol@PapaKernels

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    59.7k PapaKernels

    @ACEPILOT109 ah. Yea interiors seem to take a while, but I make mine basic so it doesn't take as long. Your probably making it super detailed so it would take awhile. I think I might just make like the cabin and ask other people to finish the frame, I think I could get some cool stuff out of that

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @PapaKernels
    I have not released the DeLorean, I'm still working on the interior

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    59.7k PapaKernels

    @ACEPILOT109 but it looks so bad at the front, but honestly that's probably the hardest part for the striping. Did you release your delorean yet, or are you still tweaking it?

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    It looks alright! @PapaKernels

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    59.7k PapaKernels

    @XP sorta

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    59.7k PapaKernels

    @XP yea but it looks cool.

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.0k TriStar

    Nice build! It has dihedral and it has covered wings. However, i don’t think the default LG fits here, too small and it’ll get crushed by the weight.

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    59.7k PapaKernels

    @ACEPILOT109 yea it's a bit of a chonk but it flies realistic, so it flies like a whale, but you know with wings. I tried making some striping but it just looks garbage.

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    59.7k PapaKernels

    @KnightOfRen damn it. I seriously completely forgot about that. Sorry I'll see if i can scrap together another, goes to calculator real quick, 59 PARTS!!!!! Welp I'm disqualified I dont think I can scrape another 59 parts out of this. I tried.

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    41.8k Ren

    @PapaKernels
    MIN parts is 130

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    59.7k PapaKernels

    @KnightOfRen god damn it i forgot about that. What's max parts again?

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    41.8k Ren

    Sorry, this does not follow minimum part

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    wow thicc boi!

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    59.7k PapaKernels

    @Knightofren this is my entry hope it does well, (I doubt it will, the interior is pretty bad)

    4.1 years ago