Me 109
870 PLANS
8.4 years ago
It has a gun in the nose, no landing gear cause it just didnt work and the cockpit is by far the most inaccurate part.
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Created On iOS
- Wingspan 49.0ft (14.9m)
- Length 39.4ft (12.0m)
- Height 11.0ft (3.3m)
- Empty Weight 12,617lbs (5,723kg)
- Loaded Weight 18,753lbs (8,506kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 1.797
- Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.053
- Wing Loading 23.8lbs/ft2 (116.0kg/m2)
- Wing Area 789.1ft2 (73.3m2)
- Drag Points 3768
Parts
- Number of Parts 250
- Control Surfaces 11
- Performance Cost 798
@PLANS oh,sorry,my other tablet was broked,so i dont remember what de are talking,but i like ur bf109f1
@PPLANESco well you know what plane it is, and that was my goal
@PLANS The plane's name is actually bad,it is a BF-109-F1 MESCHERMMIT
@DragonAerotech um I don't think I can do that on an Ipad
@PLANS disableAircraftCollisions="true" - goes after Materials in the part description. Put that on your' wings and no more annoying rattle. I wonder why my planes were gradually shaking loose a layer of wing? Maybe not nudged close enough together?
Stay tuned guys it may be a year from now but I am making a light cursier or a destroyer to go along side my 51 Threasher
@Samwise thanks mate
@DragonAerotech I really just put two wing guns just for the sake of it. Most of my planes have double wings very close to each other mostly over lapping and non of those wing have every detached or blown up the plane. There's a de-collision code, I never knew that existed.
Ah hah! Upon closer inspection you have doubled wings. Since an update a while back those can be problematic for part collisions. I JUST built my first couple twinned wing birds a few weeks ago and had to add coding to avoid losing wings! lol
@PLANS That's a sign that there are part collisions going on somewhere in the build but not enough to cause a catastrophic failure since it didn't drop parts or blow up. I'm sorry you couldn't get the landing gear to look right or get her to take off right though. I reaffirm though that you did a wonderful job reproducing this beaute's form. I'm just now learning to make custom landing gear so I'm not exactly the right source to help with that. In the future though don't hesitate to ask for help from some of the truly magnificent builders here in the forums. Now, for this girl, if you'd like I can mod the guns to accurately represent the 7.92 mm MG 17 Machine Guns in the top of the nose, mod the wing guns and get the 20 mm MG FF into the spinner if you'd like? Which variant is this to where it has two guns per wing? At first I thought she might be an E-3 or E-4 until I noticed that?
Very nice plane! Looking at all of your aircrafts, your a pretty skilled builder. You earned a follower!
@DragonAerotech for me it didnt blow up the landing just didnt look good and it made it impossible to take off it doesnt matter all that much but there's still a rattling sound that I couldn't find what made that noise anyway.
@PLANS I'd say you did pretty darn good with the tools we have. I've seen far more experienced builders put out famous aircraft that didn't have this much attention paid to the shape/form of the aircraft. I think what might have happened with the landing gear is not having the coding to disable collisions between parts. Did it seem to work but you heard a strange rattling sound just before it went boom?
No problem 👍🏻 @PLANS
@PlanesOfOld thanks
Don't worry the cockpit isn't that bad,