@Tuffbot well, I say good luck getting past PyrhPan, it might-as-well be a suicide mission. As for the flight controls of the Black Triangle, there’s a list of crafts labeled UFO’s and Black Projects where you can find a UFO Flight Model, subbed out as an Orb UFO. The description should tell you everything you need.
Image 1 looks good, also this is one of the best F-117’s I’ve ever seen. Maybe when the new cockpit update comes out, you could replace all those custom dials and displays and whatnot with the default parts!
@DontReadMyProfilePicture
@soldier289
Well that’s the issue, the original author either deleted the post, or they don’t exist anymore; I tried to find them via the successor system, by posting it and seeing who made the predecessor, but nothing showed up, as if I was the original poster. So idk who made it, I asked the same questions and made the same clarifications on the CL-1201 post, and no information was unearthed in the process, so idk what to say.
@LittleJerry ah ok, well if you launch them with no velocity and they’re level with the ground, they will kinda just act like torpedos and skim across the surface of the water. They need impact force on the tip of the warhead to detonate!
That under-mounted Jet Engine is a unique design, but there’s certainly the risk of dust and other various debris getting caught inside of it upon taking off and/or landing.
If we can replace 100’s of missiles stacked on top of each other, with just one missile that duplicates itself when needed, that would be incredibly part efficient! But, it is most likely not on the agenda.
It would certainly be more convenient than having to use a barely reliable FT prop engine that goes past normal RPM’s, making slightly probable engine sounds.
@Defalt1 That’s really awesome!
+1You just noticed?
@Tuffbot well, I say good luck getting past PyrhPan, it might-as-well be a suicide mission. As for the flight controls of the Black Triangle, there’s a list of crafts labeled UFO’s and Black Projects where you can find a UFO Flight Model, subbed out as an Orb UFO. The description should tell you everything you need.
yes
+2hehe spotlight go brrrr
+5Huh, that’s actually really odd.
“There are players like you in every forum post. And I've banned every last one of them.” - Moderator Shilage
Heh, you think you’ve wasted my time? Jokes on you, I have nothing better to do.
“Can he drive?”
“Heh. Can he drive? ‘You know what DM stands for?”
“Discord Moderator?”
“Nah. Drift MiG.”
cue this video
+4@Dathcha accurate.
@Tookan no, although that could be fun...
+3That prop decoy is hilariously smart.
@Dathcha well, “better” is an optimistic way to put it.
@Dathcha I didn’t build the original F4.
In that first GIF with the high explosionScale value Infernos, how in the world did that not lag like hell? Also DAMN this thing is cool!
Image 1 looks good, also this is one of the best F-117’s I’ve ever seen. Maybe when the new cockpit update comes out, you could replace all those custom dials and displays and whatnot with the default parts!
+1@Shoukaku sorry, wasn’t doing my job. My mistake.
+4This is terrifyingly fun to hide from as a small human walker, great build!
+1@VolcanicAsh I’ve seen stuff here with a hundred times as much drag as that, so much that the website thinks it’s a phone number lol
@soldier289 sounds like the best way to go about it, same thing I did on the CL-1201. I may post it in a day or two, depending on how things go.
+1@V I’d rather post it public though, I atleast want it to get some attention.
But but bu-
+5ˢᵠᵘᵃʳᵉ ᶦⁿˡᵉᵗˢ ᵃʳᵉ ᶜᵒᵒˡ ˡᵒᵒᵏᶦⁿᵍ ᵗᵒᵒ •-•
Very clever.
@DontReadMyProfilePicture
@soldier289
Well that’s the issue, the original author either deleted the post, or they don’t exist anymore; I tried to find them via the successor system, by posting it and seeing who made the predecessor, but nothing showed up, as if I was the original poster. So idk who made it, I asked the same questions and made the same clarifications on the CL-1201 post, and no information was unearthed in the process, so idk what to say.
@LittleJerry ah ok, well if you launch them with no velocity and they’re level with the ground, they will kinda just act like torpedos and skim across the surface of the water. They need impact force on the tip of the warhead to detonate!
@LittleJerry on rare occasion, or if used incorrectly, yes.
@Hedero oh lol, cheers
@Kendall0Clock 5819185473737191937475547390020527374mph
+1@Hedero yee
Congrats dude, a Dev upvoted this!
+2@Hedero well, as far as I know, he did fly the U2 Dragonlady, unless I’ve been misinformed?
This is absolutely amazing!
Wonderful thumbnail presentation, I suppose beaching the ship is a pretty efficient way of showing off the entire thing at once lol
+5That under-mounted Jet Engine is a unique design, but there’s certainly the risk of dust and other various debris getting caught inside of it upon taking off and/or landing.
+1@Chickendude you could try, but with the supermanueverability, it could be risky.
@KnightOfRen I lifted it into the air with an MIL-V12 Homer, and dropped it onto the USS Beast lol
Make a Pterodactyl, or some other avian dinosaur, except give it missiles or some shit lmao
If we can replace 100’s of missiles stacked on top of each other, with just one missile that duplicates itself when needed, that would be incredibly part efficient! But, it is most likely not on the agenda.
+2Actually kinda fun
Absolutely amazing shading!
+1Very nice for your first aircraft!
+1@CRJ900Pilot YES
In terms of mechanics, when it comes to satisfying machinery, almost nothing compares to a good set of tank tracks. Very smooth suspension movement!
+3Normal players: “Wow, what a nice house, this looks great!”
Me: unsheaths B-29
+6It would certainly be more convenient than having to use a barely reliable FT prop engine that goes past normal RPM’s, making slightly probable engine sounds.
boing
+3@Kangy yeah lol
+1Looks really cool, I love the livery!
+1P-65 Black Mamba
+2P-49 Falcon
F-6E Albatross
Are we still doing this
+1