@Graingy Silence! restrain thy tongue, for its ceaseless chatter doth disturb the tranquility of this sacred space. Dear friend, pray tell, what manner of confusion hath befallen us? By the stars above, I am confounded beyond measure.
Ermm, actually, 🤓☝️ I do prefer to use the proper grammar for the English language. This includes spelling, since you have spelt the word,”actually” as “akcually”. Please do not make these mistakes again. 🤓☝️
The Japanese coast guard Q300 was ordered by ATC to taxi to the same runway JAL was landing on but stop before the actual runway. The Q300 taxied onto the runway and the JAL pilots did not see the Q300’s lights because it was dark and most likely confused them with the landing lights on the runway. The result was the JAL A350 landing on top of the Q300. Btw didn’t this happen like 3 months ago? Kinda late to ask this Lol
@HanakoSan yes, very unfortunate for the mig15. But whats even more insulting is that NATO actually gives the names to soviet aircraft because they look like that. So NATO pilots thought the MiG-15 looked like a “Fagot” Lmao
@Majakalona no, i have left hand-sied sindroem
+1@Majakalona I hab 13 of 48 chromosomes, they made a finding Nemo movie remake about me called finding chromosomes :P :D
+1@Majakalona L bozo moment
+1First
Quite a coincidence its named the same but isn’t a tank Lol
Ummmm, sure this isn’t supposed to be that trash paper tiger of a tank? here
@TheMouse I WASNT HERE BEFORE TH MOUSE I AM DISSAPOINTED >:(
Can I help? Might be a little late Lol
@Graingy Silence! restrain thy tongue, for its ceaseless chatter doth disturb the tranquility of this sacred space. Dear friend, pray tell, what manner of confusion hath befallen us? By the stars above, I am confounded beyond measure.
@Graingy yes, especially in Mario kart deluxe.
@TheMouse doesn’t work
Good handling and controlling, but the cockpit isn’t very detailed. 6.4/10
@TheUltimatePlaneLover oh btw how u get four screenshots? I still dont know how
@Speedhunter yes
I wasn’t here before the mouse :(
Cool, edit the title so it says “Viggen”
+1@DatFiat126Guy19 …
@HanakoSan idk, his last comment was 10 months ago
+2mine is Ronald Reagan
+1T
I’ve been here over a year, keep going
+1Gl
+1@Mahoots @TheMouse is the one who is everywhere. Many people will say Herebeforethemouse if they upvoted something before him
+1HereBeforeTheMouse
@CallsignGizmo … you didn’t even read my comment, i said “this includes spelling…”
Now I’m no professional on this stuff, but that looks a little too “aerodynamic” for a ww1 plane Lol
@TheMouse oh mb im just like that its fixed i noticed before you said that too slow try again LLLLLLL
+1FINE BRI’ISH CUISINE
Also I have a really funny water bottle irl just click here Lmao
+1@DatFiat126Guy19
Ermm, actually, 🤓☝️ I do prefer to use the proper grammar for the English language. This includes spelling, since you have spelt the word,”actually” as “akcually”. Please do not make these mistakes again. 🤓☝️
+1Less go ur back keep this great work up bro 👏👏👏👏
@IDK0 kk
@upperflat np, all the submissions everyone made should be rated now Lol
+18/10 — looks
7/10 — impressiveness
10/10 — creativeness
10/10 — originality
6/10 — difficulty to build
5/5 — Bonus points (odd contraption but impressive to say the least)
Overall: 46/55, good job!
6/10 — looks
7/10 — impressiveness
10/10 — creativeness
10/10 — originality
3/10 — difficulty to build
4/5 — Bonus points (simple prop interceptors are really neat)
Overall: 40/55, good job!
7/10 — looks
8/10 — impressiveness
9/10 — creativeness
10/10 — originality
7/10 — difficulty to build
5/5 — Bonus points (I like UAVs)
Overall: 46/55, good job!
5/10 — looks
5/10 — impressiveness
7/10 — creativeness
10/10 — originality
2/10 — difficulty to build
5/5 — Bonus points (its simple, and that’s why its good)
Overall: 34/55, good job!
8/10 — looks
+18/10 — impressiveness
10/10 — creativeness
10/10 — originality
6/10 — difficulty to build
5/5 — Bonus points (custom missile which is cool)
Overall: 47/55, good job!
10/10 — looks
+17/10 — impressiveness
10/10 — creativeness
10/10 — originality
4/10 — difficulty to build
5/5 — Bonus points (should make it fly, this is pretty funny)
Overall: 46/55, good job!
8/10 — looks
7/10 — impressiveness
10/10 — creativeness
10/10 — originality
6/10 — difficulty to build
5/5 — Bonus points (didn’t expect anyone to make something like this)
Overall: 46/55, good job!
@Airgaurdian mb ill do it today i have a lot to finish today from school
+1@DimitriIqbal91 yes
@asteroidbook345 true
+1@IDK0 yay!
@Aeroplane351 hooray!!
@IDK0 thank you!
@asteroidbook345 that’s exactly what @DatFiat126Guy19 answered to. Apparently it “enriches the mind n shit” (I honestly dont know)
+1Wait a minute, I use gravitar for my Spanish 1 class and there’s nothing wrong with it? Lol
+1The Japanese coast guard Q300 was ordered by ATC to taxi to the same runway JAL was landing on but stop before the actual runway. The Q300 taxied onto the runway and the JAL pilots did not see the Q300’s lights because it was dark and most likely confused them with the landing lights on the runway. The result was the JAL A350 landing on top of the Q300. Btw didn’t this happen like 3 months ago? Kinda late to ask this Lol
+2The Boeing 985. Which is the one designed for the Boeing 747 flying aircraft carrier concept thingy (dont think I don’t know about that)
+2@HanakoSan yes, very unfortunate for the mig15. But whats even more insulting is that NATO actually gives the names to soviet aircraft because they look like that. So NATO pilots thought the MiG-15 looked like a “Fagot” Lmao
+1