I hope this build would not end up in another drama again, considering this was based on a controversial build that got lots of drama, moderators had to intervene.
.
With this, I shall reiterate my statement:
To those who visit this build
I beg you all not to send hate or incite drama, just because of this anime character; it doesn’t work, it just ruins the website and therefore creativity.
@Allegro369, take Phoebe’s advice. The internet is a pretty dangerous place (e.g. stalkers) and revealing your personal information can be catastrophic to both yourself and your mental health. This is why we have fake names so you don’t know who we are, because that protects us from the aforementioned dangers.
The German Corsair was like any other average low-quality builds; it did not get as much attention, nor upvotes as high quality builds are like. When one user made a forum post, claiming that the German Corsair was the “most underrated plane ever” and urging users to upvote it, the other users, being Generation Z with a weird sense of humor, thought that it was funny and upvoted said German Corsair anyways, making it rise to the front page of the “highest rated in all” section. Meanwhile, other users loathed the unprecedented rise of such a low-quality build and started to fight, creating a drama that forced interventions from moderators. Today, it is the second most upvoted aircraft, below a P-51 replica (which I suspect a similar but less destructive drama happened).
.
The resultant chaos is a reminder that the SimplePlanes community has not yet matured away from it’s darker, chaotic past that had a lot of drama. If you look at some older posts, you may see my point... ;)
Well, that’s a pretty nice build, eh?
.
Try to use fuselage blocks, they’re modular and you can slice them by going to the settings and modifying the bottom slider parameters.
@MrSilverWolf, now try and make a SimplePlanes machinima video based on this idea of mine (look at my comment before this very comment) and post it here!
The icon looks pretty good, although it can be simplified. The logotype, well I can pretty much understand why did you put the word “Please don't make fun on this” on this logo post.
@asteroidbook345, @V, being a moderator is considered a prestigious job by parts of the community and brings a lot of privileges not available to normal users, so do not be surprised when a number of applications were made by users who want nothing but power grab.
No, moderators cannot view login information. Moderators are capable of editing bios of any user, not just posts. They decided use said power on their own bios because it is fun. It is unknown when did these quotes start to appear on their bios, but it is speculated to have been there for years, as Seeras’ bio has a large amount of quote edits from other moderators.
That’s a pretty nice picture and I like how you start the hinges, as well as what appears to be an advanced construct with XML. Maybe show a video about how it works here.
This looks pretty awesome, but it seems to have a lot of technical discrepancies (like how the engines appear to be weird, disconnected from the inlets and attached to the body, creating a weird shape that could not improve performance). I suggest using fighter aircraft references when making fighter aircraft like this (though it appears you may be using such references).
It looks more like a largeAPC than a tank, with a pretty high silhouette (as well a a turret where the turret body appears to be a bit off forward from the turret base ring, and the entire turret assembly needs to be moved a bit forward) and non-uniform colors. Wonder where would you pot those large components in the main body of said tank.
Well, it’s pretty much the same, but this time, no spotlight (there’s already a spotlight), so cold you at least put a link to the new post on old post?
You are not the first person to make a penis-shaped airplane. The joke is old and boring now.
Ok @Vincent, please asses if this is considered legitimate or not, since I am not sure wether it violates the rules on explicit sexual content or not? If this post violates the rules, please remove it, thanks.
Ah yes. You are beginning to move on...
.
Do as much as you can. Don’t draw too complex. I usually try to keep things easy...
.
Good luck, kiddo. If you are finished, post it to a site like Deviantart or Wattpad.
@IceCraftGaming, it’s okay if you cannot flash your points because your points flair will be replaced by the mod flair. At least, you are still active (and maybe making keep on funny things).
@DC10, if you want to delete this post, click the down arrow button, besides the words “downloads” and then click “remove”, then continue the procedure until you are able to delete the craft. Next time, please post work in progress builds as unlisted.
@GrandmasterPotato, just go to the settings and try to put the physics level to whatever suits you, like “high physics” if you want a more realistic physics. Note that Simpleplanes is a video game, not a physics simulator.
Imagine if Cirno the ice fairy “drank” it... XD
+1ᶜᶦʳⁿᵒ © ᵀᵉᵃᵐ ˢʰᵃⁿᵍʰᵃᶦ ᴬˡᶦᶜᵉ.
I hope this build would not end up in another drama again, considering this was based on a controversial build that got lots of drama, moderators had to intervene.
+6.
With this, I shall reiterate my statement:
@Allegro369, still, please do not reveal your age or your birthdate to protect yourself. Thanks.
It should be separated into “anime build maker” and “humanoid walker maker”.
+1@Allegro369, take Phoebe’s advice. The internet is a pretty dangerous place (e.g. stalkers) and revealing your personal information can be catastrophic to both yourself and your mental health. This is why we have fake names so you don’t know who we are, because that protects us from the aforementioned dangers.
That’s pretty nice for a tank (and with glass armor). I suspect said tank has an unmanned turret, since the turret appears too cramped.
The German Corsair was like any other average low-quality builds; it did not get as much attention, nor upvotes as high quality builds are like. When one user made a forum post, claiming that the German Corsair was the “most underrated plane ever” and urging users to upvote it, the other users, being Generation Z with a weird sense of humor, thought that it was funny and upvoted said German Corsair anyways, making it rise to the front page of the “highest rated in all” section. Meanwhile, other users loathed the unprecedented rise of such a low-quality build and started to fight, creating a drama that forced interventions from moderators. Today, it is the second most upvoted aircraft, below a P-51 replica (which I suspect a similar but less destructive drama happened).
+1.
The resultant chaos is a reminder that the SimplePlanes community has not yet matured away from it’s darker, chaotic past that had a lot of drama. If you look at some older posts, you may see my point... ;)
Well, that’s a pretty nice build, eh?
.
Try to use fuselage blocks, they’re modular and you can slice them by going to the settings and modifying the bottom slider parameters.
But @V, your name is a code name of the V bomber group.
+1Generation 2 Transformers, anybody? These words remind me of such.
Ouch... :(
@MrSilverWolf, now try and make a SimplePlanes machinima video based on this idea of mine (look at my comment before this very comment) and post it here!
+1Good luck with the film and move on! I may request a summary of the film, but it is optional.
”Due to intense modifications to this product, your warranty on said product has been voided.”
+5Now that everybody wants to buy this craft, you made a lot of profit. ;)
Note: HIS ACCOUNT just turned 4 months old, not his age.
+1The icon looks pretty good, although it can be simplified. The logotype, well I can pretty much understand why did you put the word “Please don't make fun on this” on this logo post.
@MrSilverWolf, @SpiritusRaptor, that would make an excellent film!
+1.
Now with even more action!
Gary’s basics in engineering and landing gears.
Download the craft and play this wonderful educational game!
+9Nice APC, but the nose looks too long and the back length appears insufficient.
Let us see what would this concept do in MultiPlayer... >:)
+1That’s also nice. It looks closer to the most popular model by DGI.
@asteroidbook345, @V, being a moderator is considered a prestigious job by parts of the community and brings a lot of privileges not available to normal users, so do not be surprised when a number of applications were made by users who want nothing but power grab.
+2No, moderators cannot view login information. Moderators are capable of editing bios of any user, not just posts. They decided use said power on their own bios because it is fun. It is unknown when did these quotes start to appear on their bios, but it is speculated to have been there for years, as Seeras’ bio has a large amount of quote edits from other moderators.
+2@Brayden1981, I cannot understand what are you saying. Please clarify. Thanks.
That’s a pretty nice picture and I like how you start the hinges, as well as what appears to be an advanced construct with XML. Maybe show a video about how it works here.
This looks pretty awesome, but it seems to have a lot of technical discrepancies (like how the engines appear to be weird, disconnected from the inlets and attached to the body, creating a weird shape that could not improve performance). I suggest using fighter aircraft references when making fighter aircraft like this (though it appears you may be using such references).
+22 cameras? that’s interesting.
+1It looks more like a largeAPC than a tank, with a pretty high silhouette (as well a a turret where the turret body appears to be a bit off forward from the turret base ring, and the entire turret assembly needs to be moved a bit forward) and non-uniform colors. Wonder where would you pot those large components in the main body of said tank.
Well, it’s pretty much the same, but this time, no spotlight (there’s already a spotlight), so cold you at least put a link to the new post on old post?
Look at the fences, the front hull, the rigging, and so on. Why no windows and spotlights, but hey, at least it’s good.
+1AND SO, A NEW PROJECT BEGINS...
+4@mori810, I of you don’t understand, I must clarify the joke. “Can it eat doriftos” means “Can it drift”.
+1I also got SimplePlanes VR and an oculus rift headset, however, I am reluctant to reuse it over privacy and eye health concerns.
+1Ok @Vincent, please asses if this is considered legitimate or not, since I am not sure wether it violates the rules on explicit sexual content or not? If this post violates the rules, please remove it, thanks.
Ah, what a nice thing is it? With a lot of good details in a few part count, this will certainly earn a spotlight from me.
When posting WIP crafts, please post it as unlisted instead, so your posts (and also the airplane posts) will not be cluttered up.
@ALTMTR, and then said movie gets rated B for your convenience by movie critics. XD
+3Ah yes. You are beginning to move on...
+2.
Do as much as you can. Don’t draw too complex. I usually try to keep things easy...
.
Good luck, kiddo. If you are finished, post it to a site like Deviantart or Wattpad.
What happens when you put Hollywood-esque stereotypical young millennials in charge of a kinetic bombardment control station?
+3At least it’s got a pretty decent humanoid.
JAMES THE BOND 005
Now with 2 new secret agent trainees.
@mori810, then make a video about it!
+1Can It eat doriftos?
@IceCraftGaming, it’s okay if you cannot flash your points because your points flair will be replaced by the mod flair. At least, you are still active (and maybe making keep on funny things).
+3Hey @Vincent, is this legal according to the rules, since I am expressing similar concerns but reluctant to report it. Thanks.
-Bellcat
While it is simple, it is intricately modeled. Is this VR-capable, though?
@DC10, if you want to delete this post, click the down arrow button, besides the words “downloads” and then click “remove”, then continue the procedure until you are able to delete the craft. Next time, please post work in progress builds as unlisted.
@GrandmasterPotato, just go to the settings and try to put the physics level to whatever suits you, like “high physics” if you want a more realistic physics. Note that Simpleplanes is a video game, not a physics simulator.
Have you tried modifying physics?
@GrandmasterPotato, about that...
try to check wing symmetry on the vertical stabilizer.
don’t put turning on the front gears. Put turning on the tailwheel instead.
Thanks.