@Jundroo
It's one of the finer "stock" builds that come, others being hellkesta, vertigo, mustang P-51, seaplane, and wasp, showing off the new helicopter parts. I'm not disappointed.
It also have a gyro for those who can't fly a helicopter.
@RailfanEthane
Actually if you look at the "front view" of the plane and "side view" you will see some interesting things occurring (eg. propeller blocked by the plane's body and the "head" of the aircraft is not the way it is)
nice one .....
EDIT: The flaps ... lol
@Minecraftpoweer
Yes, the WoT turret is from the data sheet.
Supposedly due to shortage of resources German can put a Maus turret on top, but that's just when they are short on resources. Given time the WoT turret will be built.
@Tully2001
I am just thinking about the entire thing about you removing my crane builds
I am not mad or what, I just want to say something.
Why do I upload these?
Heck, I made these stuff MONTHS before I publish them. I just don’t care.
Such as these painted cranes. I had finished them in October (perhaps even earlier). I just kept them before uploading as a bunch, because noglastic (spelling) reasons.
I don’t even care if I got any points out of them. I build them not because of points or anything. I build them because I want to. Then I share to hope that other people will appreciate them.
I understand that you may suspect me of farming points by making a long series of successors, but in reality, why would I even care? I upload my 10 part racer just to let other people use it (as it is a good design) to beat others. It’s a bit of a pity that none upvoted, but that’s about it.
I’m not even active in this forum. I just build some random things when I feel like to, and upload them to this forum.
I only upload something when there are a TOM of stuff in my device (that I need to clean up by upvoting and later delete them from my device, or I feel like “this is a good idea!” I will appreciate if they get attention (obviously not asking for your help over here), but points?
Heh, I can’t use these points to buy myself stuff from Starbucks. The little “fame” I got here don’t mean anything.
I don’t hook the stuff I uploaded with GNL public lisense—“this is provided in the hope that it will be USEFUL, without even a warranty or any description of a particular purpose, or WHATEVER.”—just because it sound fancy.
@mikethemark
I don't know, should I upvote this one?
There is a bit too much copying from the predecessor than I'd like there to be.
I have NOT watched the movie, sorry, and so I don't know whether this will be considered a good build or not.
BUT IT LOOK GOOD, SO IT PROBABLY IS GOOD.
@Tully2001
The complete build is almost 2,000 parts (1924) parts.
Customization and ... usage of them as separate parts are a possibility ...
And, respecting the original packaging of the LEGO crane. itself.
It would make more sense to have a top part (the crane part) and the bottom vehicle part because these two can stand on their own independently.
But on the side of LEGO, it would totally make sense for there to be three independent packages (I think so, I never owned one though) for each of the three biggest parts.
It's not for farming upvotes. Perhaps I can do unlisted uploads in the future.
AND it have the tag "parts" to lessen confusion ...
@GreatHenry
It still do.
T92HMC used to cause more pain with a 2800 dmg HE shell that reloads for ... 50 seconds.
This one was 1,000 dmg lower with a 30 second reload.
The FV 215b (183) was a more of a headache. Too bad I didn't get it ...
@NoTimeForLaughing
GREAT JOB.
I was thinking about ways to make this big gun shoot some HE shells.
ON THE OTHER HAND,
Can you do a version (no shooting necessary) for the people without the mod?
Some more descriptions would also earn this thing some extra points.
@Rub3n213
Nope, it don't. Trust me on this one.
It's limited by THE GAME, not by single rotators. I think it was that if you spin quicker the game will decrease the value down so the second rotator will never spin up.
Unless you have some ingenious contraption to spin the second one too...
It wasn't a car!
Good try though.
@sarnox @8bitgamer
Well, it is because the fact that the piston engine, when having no engine starter, will spin in random directions (especially from the beginning).
I would've thought you tried some weaker engines (a 4-piston engine would do) like mine have.
@AstonMartin145
M36 Jackson was more of a "super wolverine", with similar stuff on the similar chassis.
M18 Hellcat had its own chassis. M36 used a modified Sherman/M3 Lee suspension.
@lllKenlll
When the runway is not big enough ...
Let's make it land on the sea! That is big enough!
And that pushed them to make huge flying structures ...
I fly it on my iPad. Everything LOW, except Terrain and Physics, which are set to HIGH.
@Tully2001
Who should call if I want to report bugs?
@Jundroo
It's one of the finer "stock" builds that come, others being hellkesta, vertigo, mustang P-51, seaplane, and wasp, showing off the new helicopter parts. I'm not disappointed.
It also have a gyro for those who can't fly a helicopter.
@AndrewGarrison
This is MY entry for the air races.
You can pimp out the Mustage to make The Lightning, but no.
And trust me, El Diabolo's slower.
@L728
Suggestion: Gyro.
Matter of the fact you can fly without wings if you consider the helicopter rotors to be not a "wing" part.
Looking nice.
@costr So you are adding a tutorial for building this plane?
+1Sounds interesting. Reminds me of Lego manuals.
@destroyerP
+1I just wanted to make sure this mod works with Railfan Ethan's most models ...
@RailfanEthane
Actually if you look at the "front view" of the plane and "side view" you will see some interesting things occurring (eg. propeller blocked by the plane's body and the "head" of the aircraft is not the way it is)
nice one .....
EDIT: The flaps ... lol
@Minecraftpoweer
200mm caliber 5 Zettaa Watt laser cannon on rail ...
Hmmm....
@Minecraftpoweer
That gyro boom was also featured in couple other places with smooth turning
* cough cough * Jagd E-100's small machine gun port ...
@Minecraftpoweer
Yes, the WoT turret is from the data sheet.
Supposedly due to shortage of resources German can put a Maus turret on top, but that's just when they are short on resources. Given time the WoT turret will be built.
@Minecraftpoweer
lol flying cockpit ...
Nice one for the bombing mission, but it can't fire manually.
@Minecraftpoweer
SWEET tracks and modded engine that works flawlessly
Took out one of those destroyers in 5 shots
Any plan to make the E-100?
@Minecraftpoweer
Does it have anything to do with Lego?
winches
sure ...
They work more reliably, after all.
@Tully2001
I am just thinking about the entire thing about you removing my crane builds
I am not mad or what, I just want to say something.
Why do I upload these?
Heck, I made these stuff MONTHS before I publish them. I just don’t care.
Such as these painted cranes. I had finished them in October (perhaps even earlier). I just kept them before uploading as a bunch, because noglastic (spelling) reasons.
I don’t even care if I got any points out of them. I build them not because of points or anything. I build them because I want to. Then I share to hope that other people will appreciate them.
I understand that you may suspect me of farming points by making a long series of successors, but in reality, why would I even care? I upload my 10 part racer just to let other people use it (as it is a good design) to beat others. It’s a bit of a pity that none upvoted, but that’s about it.
I’m not even active in this forum. I just build some random things when I feel like to, and upload them to this forum.
I only upload something when there are a TOM of stuff in my device (that I need to clean up by upvoting and later delete them from my device, or I feel like “this is a good idea!” I will appreciate if they get attention (obviously not asking for your help over here), but points?
Heh, I can’t use these points to buy myself stuff from Starbucks. The little “fame” I got here don’t mean anything.
I don’t hook the stuff I uploaded with GNL public lisense—“this is provided in the hope that it will be USEFUL, without even a warranty or any description of a particular purpose, or WHATEVER.”—just because it sound fancy.
I should probably change my biography ...
@mikethemark
+1I don't know, should I upvote this one?
There is a bit too much copying from the predecessor than I'd like there to be.
I have NOT watched the movie, sorry, and so I don't know whether this will be considered a good build or not.
BUT IT LOOK GOOD, SO IT PROBABLY IS GOOD.
@Notaleopard
Oooooo......
that help explain a hidden engine at the front, the not-connected tail fin, the dragless fuselage and others.
How long does it take you?
But I'd upvote it just for the look of it.
Even though it pitch down when on land and won't take off
@Tully2001
The complete build is almost 2,000 parts (1924) parts.
Customization and ... usage of them as separate parts are a possibility ...
And, respecting the original packaging of the LEGO crane. itself.
It would make more sense to have a top part (the crane part) and the bottom vehicle part because these two can stand on their own independently.
But on the side of LEGO, it would totally make sense for there to be three independent packages (I think so, I never owned one though) for each of the three biggest parts.
It's not for farming upvotes. Perhaps I can do unlisted uploads in the future.
AND it have the tag "parts" to lessen confusion ...
These were quite large in size, after all.
+1Complete build will be released tomorrow!
+1Complete build will be released tomorrow!
Complete build will be released tomorrow!
I didn't know it was supposed to fly until I saw the two tiny(scaled) wings ...
lol.
But for builds like SUCH AIRCRAFT, this one flies good enough.
"Sorry for the suspension"
It's okay. It's just heavy.
But why don't you mod them? forgot? :P
I can't mod anyway ...
"based on track2"
Wha.....?
Anyway, good job.
I like MAN. It look and feel german. Durable and stuff.
GM is not losing, however.
Build one of theirs!
Although it was upvoted mainly because "merry christmas", the tree is indeed rather detailed and finely built.
MERRY CHRISTMAS.
"Isn't this a airplane game?"
GOOD JOB. SIMPLE, YET DETAILED.
It's these builds that are the best.
It's even more detailed than my vehicle
@CjrLdy
Jesus Christ.
Of course, 2428 parts ...
@ABC123
It's a old build. Almost a legacy itself.
You should thank Bing (the search engine) for me digging this thing out.
Because I will remake it.
@marcox43
+1EXCEPT CASTROL....
Seriously?
Being a fan of Castrol I feel like **
Just kidding. You did a GREAT job.
@enginer365
I might as well try ...
@GreatHenry
It still do.
T92HMC used to cause more pain with a 2800 dmg HE shell that reloads for ... 50 seconds.
This one was 1,000 dmg lower with a 30 second reload.
The FV 215b (183) was a more of a headache. Too bad I didn't get it ...
@NoTimeForLaughing
GREAT JOB.
I was thinking about ways to make this big gun shoot some HE shells.
ON THE OTHER HAND,
Can you do a version (no shooting necessary) for the people without the mod?
Some more descriptions would also earn this thing some extra points.
@BlackhattAircraft
It does
@Rub3n213
+1Nope, it don't. Trust me on this one.
It's limited by THE GAME, not by single rotators. I think it was that if you spin quicker the game will decrease the value down so the second rotator will never spin up.
Unless you have some ingenious contraption to spin the second one too...
It wasn't a car!
Good try though.
@sarnox @8bitgamer
Well, it is because the fact that the piston engine, when having no engine starter, will spin in random directions (especially from the beginning).
I would've thought you tried some weaker engines (a 4-piston engine would do) like mine have.
+1@Ian1231100
+1Well, one of the thing I have learned over the year, was this:
Built-in suspension from the wheels SUCK.
"The M60 is credited with a 220mm penetration of armor with its HEAT round."
Oof.
@Ian1231100
JACKPOT!
U got that right.
HOW??!!
@Theplanelover77
Nope. Try harder.
HINT: It's German.
It's rather fuel efficient.
@ProjectTank
Turret's too high and small.
It's supposed to be large and flat.
@AstonMartin145
M36 Jackson was more of a "super wolverine", with similar stuff on the similar chassis.
M18 Hellcat had its own chassis. M36 used a modified Sherman/M3 Lee suspension.
@aerodummy
Ah, you didn't mod anything.
Make sense.
Well I am not very convinced on you making a lot of change, but I upvoted anyway.
It look fine, after all.
@WeSeekANARCHY
True. 2007 PC.
I am probably going to build a BMW CSL 3.0, but I might be unable to build one ...
Fair paint job.
Hmm ...
this guy added some 120 parts onto that thing ......
The steering wheel, the frontal guns and tue such don't work.
But it's good enough.
Upvote!
The flaps keep screwing up (and I cannot stop them from rotating inwards)
What can I do?????
@lllKenlll
+2When the runway is not big enough ...
Let's make it land on the sea! That is big enough!
And that pushed them to make huge flying structures ...
I fly it on my iPad. Everything LOW, except Terrain and Physics, which are set to HIGH.