3,214 Chrisk1993 Comments

  • Major Industries SBD7 Flamingo 4.3 years ago

    @MajorSix no I just downloaded and went. Idk I think uploading can break stuff sometimes. Or maybe it's cause you used shocks which by the way is genius aesthetically but they like to do weird things when you scale them.

  • WW1 (Fictional) Warbird Challenge! [CLOSED] 4.3 years ago

    Also does it have to be a biplane? There were a number of monoplane fighters in WW1.

  • ALMOSTLIGHT CHALLENGE!!! 4.3 years ago

    @Chrisk1993 can I do a seaplane or does it have to take off from land?

  • WW1 (Fictional) Warbird Challenge! [CLOSED] 4.3 years ago

    Man this community is coming up with too many good challenges. I've got 3 challenge builds in the works right now. Oh well make that 4 I'm in. I'll do a German medium fighter.

  • Major Industries SBD7 Flamingo 4.3 years ago

    Pssst......I think you missed a connection or 2 in the general engine area. Cool though.

  • ALMOSTLIGHT CHALLENGE!!! 4.3 years ago

    Cool challenge I'll do it.

  • Russian Culture Challenge Entry 4.3 years ago

    @superTT yeah man, I agree

  • Cinema Plane 4.3 years ago

    @ollielebananiaCFSP That makes me curious then, I assumed that the limitations with running simple planes was mostly in processing power rather than graphical power due to all the Aero calculations. Do you just have a good/optimised processor or am I grossly misunderstanding things? Or just underestimating what you can get to run?

  • Cinema Plane 4.3 years ago

    @AWESOMENESS360 meh you'd be surprised what can run on a potato. Although I don't suspect that it would work so well with a 1000 part build.

  • Nakatomi Type 206 Float Fighter 4.3 years ago

    @MajorSix I'm not sure actually the one I have saved is straight. Maybe I hit an undo before I shared it by accident or something.

  • Hoverboard Guy 4.3 years ago

    Idk why I gave him a helmet he just explodes anyway.

  • Nakatomi Type 206 Float Fighter 4.3 years ago

    @LieutenantSOT yeah the original one with the wheels is my actual entry. Its a little better than this one performance wise cause it doesn't have a 1000 lb pontoon hanging off the bottom.

  • New Year Challenge (My first challenge!) (CLOSED) 4.3 years ago

    I'm just gonna make a flaming dumpster. I feel like that's gonna end up being pretty accurate for 2021.

    +1
  • Nakatomi Type 206 Float Fighter 4.3 years ago

    @LieutenantSOT thanks a lot. Btw sorry I forgot this was still saved as a successor to your challenge. Don't mean to clutter up your list. Obviously this one isn't another entry haha.

  • Nissan 260z 4.3 years ago

    Dude your cars are awesome. Im working my butt off trying to get better at car bodies and you're keeping me motivated here!

  • Focke-Wulf Ta 152 H-1 4.3 years ago

    Wow really nice cockpit. and everything else but I have a thing for making interiors.

    +1
  • Nakatomi Type 206 "Teikiatsu" 4.3 years ago

    @PapaKernels thanks i think it's my best plane yet

  • Nakatomi Type 206 "Teikiatsu" 4.3 years ago

    @Lixcuudis thanks I'm glad someone read it. Thought it might be too wordy haha

  • Nakatomi Type 206 "Teikiatsu" 4.3 years ago

    @Skyhawkarmy idk you just gotta mess around with the shapes until it looks the way you want. Use lots of pictures and reference material. There's not really any hard and fast rules or methods. That's what makes this game so awesome! Think of it like Lego. You have to figure out how to use the limited shapes you have to make the unique shapes you want

  • Nakatomi Type 206 "Teikiatsu" 4.3 years ago

    @Skyhawkarmy I guess you don't have to but I wanted the points for the description.

  • Nakatomi Type 206 "Teikiatsu" 4.3 years ago

    @Jaspy109 I'm not sure if that's a uniquely British design. If so oh well umm we will say that Japanese spies were stealing British aircraft secrets and they decided they liked that stick design.

  • WW2 (Fictional) Fighter Challenge! [CLOSED] 4.3 years ago

    Woohoo my Japanese fighter is done! I'm really proud of it I think it turned out awesome.

  • WW2 (Fictional) Fighter Challenge! [CLOSED] 4.3 years ago

    Yo put me down for a British Heavy Fighter as well I'm putting the finishing touches on my first entry so I should have time for another one.

  • WW2 (Fictional) Fighter Challenge! [CLOSED] 4.3 years ago

    @LieutenantSOT My Japanese plane will be a prop fighter but if I finish early I will do a heavy fighter with mixed propulsion. Japanese planes just don't look right without a giant nose cowl.

  • Arwing Prototype 4.3 years ago

    Do a barrel roll

  • WW2 (Fictional) Fighter Challenge! [CLOSED] 4.3 years ago

    @LieutenantSOT yeah I'm not doing a Zero copy just using it as a general guide for size. Thanks!

  • WW2 (Fictional) Fighter Challenge! [CLOSED] 4.3 years ago

    Just to be clear on weights/ sizes, would you consider the Mitsubishi A6M Zero a medium or light fighter? That's what I'm using as a yardstick for the size and weight but I can scale it up if you think a Zero is too small.

  • WW2 (Fictional) Fighter Challenge! [CLOSED] 4.3 years ago

    I think I need a good challenge right now. I'll do a Japanese medium fighter. Just double checking jets are fine as long as power and speed is realistic? If so it will be a jet.

    Edit: Nevermind the jet thing it wouldn't be realistic since they never actually deployed a jet fighter.

  • 7 Part Helicopter 4.3 years ago

    Oh nice well it's in my subassembly folder now. @Redisnotsusguys

  • 1 0 P A R T S 4.3 years ago

    @Cyan is a Jake Paul noise just a really stupid statement?

  • 1 0 P A R T S 4.3 years ago

    @Embo okay cool I thought it was thanks for clearing that up.

  • 7 Part Helicopter 4.3 years ago

    How did you make the person a single part?

  • [CLOSED] CHALLANGE use less than 10 parts on a planes 4.3 years ago

    Mines done. It's almost a plane.

  • 1 0 P A R T S 4.3 years ago

    @Embo Yeah. You can't say it on YouTube.

  • 1 0 P A R T S 4.3 years ago

    @Embo I think that's a bad word now too

  • [CLOSED] CHALLANGE use less than 10 parts on a planes 4.3 years ago

    Will it still be a successor if I change to a different style cockpit?

  • Mazda Savanna RX-7 Turbo 4.3 years ago

    @MintLynx Sweet.

    +1
  • Mazda Savanna RX-7 Turbo 4.3 years ago

    You mind if I put an engine in it? I've been wanting to build a rotary

    +5
  • My First Plane Ever 4.3 years ago

    @RedZ0ne haha should have read your profile. Guess you didn't need to do that one.

  • my first plane 4.3 years ago

    Needs more guns.

  • My First Plane Ever 4.3 years ago

    Isn't everyone's first plane ever the tutorial plane? Good job though.

    +1
  • High Detail Aero Engines 4.3 years ago

    @tsampoy yeah I wasnt really worrying about part efficiency with these. Just going for as much detail as possible before my phone caught fire. And I have learned that cooling fins are bad for part count.

  • Cam launcher 4.3 years ago

    Instructions were unclear. I exploded

  • (forktales chalenge) The sea duck 4.3 years ago

    @Elonsmusk your spaceship exploded

  • (forktales chalenge) The sea duck 4.3 years ago

    Awesome. Flying boats are sweet. I always mix up Talespin and The Rescuers. Talespin is the one with the bear right?

  • Super Aerobatic Flying Wing 4.3 years ago

    @Grogu Haha you got em rapid fire too. You crazy man. Thanks!

  • I Caught Le Big Fish 4.3 years ago

    @Grogu he hit me. With the fish.

  • crazy realistic monster truck 4.3 years ago

    @Arandomburrito There's no pivot point at the centre of the axles. A live axle system like what you made requires a pivot point so that the left and right wheels move up and down semi independently. If you drive your truck on the proving grounds you will notice that when the right wheel is on a bump, the left wheel is also lifted. Im not trying to crpa all over you either I think your build is cool. Just not as realistic as you say.

  • crazy realistic monster truck 4.3 years ago

    Your suspension doesn't work though.