@Evenstsrike333 It's on the to-do list somewhere. I already want to make one because I had a previous F-15 and...ugh, I can't look at that one anymore. X)
@LockheedLover @AerialFighterSnakes Aww jeez...maybe tone down the praise a little bit; I'm not a great builder by any means, I just do the best I can and add the features I feel need to be there. I always want to improve.
.
@LockheedLover To answer you specifically, I did build a Harrier II for one user, but generally I'll just add it to the "list" so to speak. I've gotten requests for AC builds and a Super Hornet before.
@Leehopard Happens with my A-6E too; flaperon roll control when flaps down is baically useless. Thankfully the A-6 has spoilerons that somewhat help, but I still can't figure out how to get custom ailerons to be as responaive as normal ones.
@FranzPeterSiegfried Most parts I've needed for a build was the F-4B at 400 parts flat. I'm proud to say I've been able to get away with decently low part counts on my replicas
@XthehungrymigetX Not sure where it got that bias. I probably could have done some mirroring work to make it disappear, but I'm willing to deal with the roll. Glad you like it though.
@ChiyomiAnzai Thank you. I've always liked the look of the Mirage III. In addition I've tried to make a tailless delta-wing work in game for quite some time now; I'm glad to say I've finally gotten both to work.
@0644701018
.
We'll have to see. Jets with more complex shapes like the F-22A, J-20, X-02, etc. take more time for me both in planning and building. Plus I'm not sure how stable I can make the Wyvern lel
.
One day :)
Would custom missiles for the Magic, Matra, etc count towards the sub-assembly penalty? Are weapons/stores allowed at all, or are we doing clean configuration only?
@HarryBen47 I'm still happy with this. Actually I think it's better in some ways than the replicas because it tries to be somewhat unique, and I stuck neat features into it.
@Datboi1234 lol
.
If I do an F-14B or D modification, I'll probably disable the winglets. They don't add a ton of agility to the build (which I think was a similar conclusion the Navy reached).
@ChaMikey I like both jets also. The YF-23A would be great research aircraft, so it's a shame that they've been relegated to museum pieces.
.
As for cost, we already know the Raptor has become a pricey fighter. How many more F-23A could we have gotten for the same price though? Maybe 5, 10, 15 at best?
.
@ChiChiWerx Good point. How much do we actually know about these jets? If that recent story about the Eagle Dynamics employee says anything even old jets still have classified data in the TDP. Not unlikely the Raptor and Black Widow II hid secrets as well that led to the AF choice of adoption.
@Yoyoyooo A Raptor will eventually come...I'm putting it off a LOT but it shall come lol
.
As for a specific livery, I might attempt a rough approximation of the typical low-visibility sploches, but not much more. I ain't exactly great at paintjobs lol
@Kimcotupan15 Thank you :)
.
@SelectAKey I tried to do it justice. The user wanted the AV-8B or -8B+, but I decided to try a British Harrier. Given how the GR.7 was developed it basically is the AV-8B
@BogdanX I've noticed in testing that sometimes the jet will violently twitch. I've had it happen with other builds before too. I think the rudder is a bit too big and that might contribute, but I'm otherwise happy with the performance. Shoutout to @WPN78 for the designersuite mod.
.
And I mean...it is SimplePlanes. ;)
@ShermanFirefly Danger Zone intensifies
.
Thank you. I'll be honest I was woefully optimistic about the part count. I thought it'd be 200 or less; BOY was I wrong lel
@Evenstsrike333 It's on the to-do list somewhere. I already want to make one because I had a previous F-15 and...ugh, I can't look at that one anymore. X)
@LockheedLover OOOoooooo, I'd love to make a bomber! Just...gotta figure out the bomb bay X)
@LockheedLover Okie
.
Did you have a request, by chance?
@BlackhattAircraft So about that A-7 you mentioned...
@LockheedLover @AerialFighterSnakes Aww jeez...maybe tone down the praise a little bit; I'm not a great builder by any means, I just do the best I can and add the features I feel need to be there. I always want to improve.
.
@LockheedLover To answer you specifically, I did build a Harrier II for one user, but generally I'll just add it to the "list" so to speak. I've gotten requests for AC builds and a Super Hornet before.
@Leehopard Happens with my A-6E too; flaperon roll control when flaps down is baically useless. Thankfully the A-6 has spoilerons that somewhat help, but I still can't figure out how to get custom ailerons to be as responaive as normal ones.
@BlackhattAircraft Funny you say that...
@FranzPeterSiegfried Most parts I've needed for a build was the F-4B at 400 parts flat. I'm proud to say I've been able to get away with decently low part counts on my replicas
@ChiChiWerx Indeed.
@HawkerAviation Aww thanks. I have far too many projects on the brain and it's killing my productivity x)
@Kungfuevan I'm gonna redo the Su-27 first with Designersuite, then do the Su-30MKI. So it'll be a while
@HighOnSP Have an upvote too :)
Could you explain the weapon requirement, because I'm getting confused if you mean stock SP weapons or stuff that was supplied with this post
@Datboi1234 4 Also had it. However that was the -5E Tiger II, so slightly different. This is the original -5A 'Freedom Fighter.'
.
But I get ye
@DemXu Sure.
@XthehungrymigetX Not sure where it got that bias. I probably could have done some mirroring work to make it disappear, but I'm willing to deal with the roll. Glad you like it though.
@emilydyer455 I do have a Hornet planned, but it's a two-seat legacy Hornet. Maybe I can do a Super Hornet, but no promises.
@Roswell @Bife @Kungfuevan Thank you
@0644701018 Not an 4E; this lacks the longer nose and gun ;)
@Shippy456 Kind words of you. Thanks
@AnoniMosu It was called 'The Flying Drumstick' for a reason.
@ChiChiWerx I just balanced it nose-heavy. I should've put trim on the tailplanes but I was tired and forgot to do it.
Oooooo...interesting.
@ainanen No problem. Was nice to build a jet that wasn't American or Russian for once x)
@ChiyomiAnzai Thank you. I've always liked the look of the Mirage III. In addition I've tried to make a tailless delta-wing work in game for quite some time now; I'm glad to say I've finally gotten both to work.
@Ryn176 Welcome to FSX: Steam Edition xD
Again, not a delta. This is a highly swept wing in a tailless configuration, but still kewl
Not really a delta-wing; more of a flying wing, but cool
@0644701018
.
We'll have to see. Jets with more complex shapes like the F-22A, J-20, X-02, etc. take more time for me both in planning and building. Plus I'm not sure how stable I can make the Wyvern lel
.
One day :)
Would custom missiles for the Magic, Matra, etc count towards the sub-assembly penalty? Are weapons/stores allowed at all, or are we doing clean configuration only?
Mmm, another good looking razorback Mustang :3
I am so happy to see a forgotten aircraft be built with attention to detail like this. The VTOL that never was, alongside its counterpart VAK-191.
@HarryBen47 I'm still happy with this. Actually I think it's better in some ways than the replicas because it tries to be somewhat unique, and I stuck neat features into it.
@Nerfenthusiast @JamesBoA @USSR
.
Thank you. :) Got it working
@Datboi1234 lol
.
If I do an F-14B or D modification, I'll probably disable the winglets. They don't add a ton of agility to the build (which I think was a similar conclusion the Navy reached).
@ChiChiWerx Huh, didn't know that. Thanks for sharing. :)
@ChaMikey I like both jets also. The YF-23A would be great research aircraft, so it's a shame that they've been relegated to museum pieces.
.
As for cost, we already know the Raptor has become a pricey fighter. How many more F-23A could we have gotten for the same price though? Maybe 5, 10, 15 at best?
.
@ChiChiWerx Good point. How much do we actually know about these jets? If that recent story about the Eagle Dynamics employee says anything even old jets still have classified data in the TDP. Not unlikely the Raptor and Black Widow II hid secrets as well that led to the AF choice of adoption.
@Yoyoyooo A Raptor will eventually come...I'm putting it off a LOT but it shall come lol
.
As for a specific livery, I might attempt a rough approximation of the typical low-visibility sploches, but not much more. I ain't exactly great at paintjobs lol
:)
@0644701018 No probs. Was quite fun :)
@Kimcotupan15 Thank you :)
.
@SelectAKey I tried to do it justice. The user wanted the AV-8B or -8B+, but I decided to try a British Harrier. Given how the GR.7 was developed it basically is the AV-8B
@BogdanX I've noticed in testing that sometimes the jet will violently twitch. I've had it happen with other builds before too. I think the rudder is a bit too big and that might contribute, but I'm otherwise happy with the performance. Shoutout to @WPN78 for the designersuite mod.
.
And I mean...it is SimplePlanes. ;)
Maybe an S.E.5? You mention Werner Voss in the D.III build, so why not the plane that brought him down? I dunno
@MintLynx Funny enough the hollow fuselage would not have made the build accurate; this is old fashioned fuselage blocks shaped and nudged into place.
@MintLynx Funny enough the hollow fuselage would not have made the build accurate; this is old fashioned fuselage blocks shaped and nudged into place.
@Carbonfox1 Thank you. I certainly wish I'd done some XML drag reduction on the wings before I posted; did it afterwards and got a decent speed boost.
@0644701018 I'll add it to the list. Any specific version you want?
Awww he's so cute~ :3
@ShermanFirefly Danger Zone intensifies
.
Thank you. I'll be honest I was woefully optimistic about the part count. I thought it'd be 200 or less; BOY was I wrong lel
@Warshipplan52 HAH! XD