@ZeroWithSlashedO this one, no. just a plane with a really heavy spec. each of my planes have their technical challenges and solely for psm with a near 1.4 t/w. but if u think my fictional touch is too much then u can disqualify. think my earlier 3 planes are all reasonably NOT meme. the last one which looks like a gundam, maybe. personally i dont know what meme build is, probably a ufo that looks like a teddy bear and flies/does psm with no wings at all.
I tried removing the rear landing gear and the part holding it and installed a set of wing landing gears near the outer wing tips and the plane no longer turns during take off thank me later
@ZeroWithSlashedO well i just finished a good one i havent uploaded yet, i will probably only upload few days later and ask u so i wont break any rules, and no, they are not even in my profile. the ones that i already uploaded are shitty in comparison. i think i still have 3 spots for new designs?
@Falco7 hey the f-16 is excellent for this. i was going to make one for f-16 if i am not stuck with all the tvc traditions i am having for my designs here. f-16 is a top for my list of standard platform.
@ZeroWithSlashedO i remember if i do it again from that redirected post it might as well become a true successor, if that doesnt work i will do something to make it one then. lemme try that tmr first
let me know of an easier way to successor to this event other than going into xml, i cant find a cockpit in my design already and cant sub-assembly my whole plane to yours.
@Mattthepilot12 not really, i know its unstable but if u know the drill its actually good. if u r not going over the aoa limit it behaves like a normal plane. this kind of planes they use fly-by-wire to stabilize in real life so u dont accelerate into the turns the way the plane tend to do. all 3 axis are good imo. if u r using mobile phone to fly this of cos it will be a hard thing to do. this plane needs u to put a lot into the rudder input. i can land this thing on a carrier no problem. just dont expect this to be the many arcade/toyish ace combat planes people make here that flies like a train.
@X99STRIKER is that the balancing u found defective? i just updated a new one now it doesnt sway to one side anymore. thanks. if theres anything else u think my plane needs improvement please let me know. i hope u dont use mobile tho, using my planes on mobile can be tough.
@OrderlyHippo u like it? theres still some minor things i need to fix with this thing. i probably have 5 other planes i can share at the challenge, 5 different designs.
@ZeroWithSlashedO fine then i will keep things short. this method is a bit much hacking for my comfort, is the posting of aircraft final candidate or do i get a chance to edit? if i do get to edit after i put my plane here then i will just post it to keep things simple
@ZeroWithSlashedO well, i am gonna post 3 completed planes out of the 30ish that i made last 4 days, probably end up with 5 entries so the 3 are ones that probably a lot of work wont help much with the flying. just to find out i am pretty thrust vectoring/vtol engine heavy since u said tv/vtol welcome, but then u said somewhere in the thread that u hated thrust vectoring bullshit, so should i go or not? lol. well all my designs are pretty good imo. i need to work on the hud tho i think. i just grab them so i can at least fly/test my planes. plane wise quite original. can i post wip and change before the deadline or all posts are final? sometimes i wish people can try them and tell me ideas on improvements. my planes are made with pc i think they are a bit on the sensitive side if u use it on a phone too. i wish i can post earlier so i wont break your rules. at least i dont cheat with codes, code hack wings and without doing it i pretty much already broke the physics and made newton scream already. i just dont want to scream on your deadline when i find out i broke your rules on last minute, btw where is a good place to find a g-limiter of your choice? edit: after looking closer to the rules i just find out u said 1.4 w/t is for before after burning and ok with 2.7 w/ after burning i just read off my (i) all the time and made sure it's under 1.4 duh. how do u check the number with and without afterburning?
what if it's so maneuverable i almost kicked flat spin out of the equation??
btw sometimes stability and super-maneuverability don't mix, i.e. many of them has negative stability (accelerates into a turn that works better when ai assisted aka fly-by-wire)
i have a really good plane wip that does all of the above. i was going to call it the navy's wetdream if the moderators let me do it.
@BarrowAircraft it is especially if u see it in a dogfight. and especially after both planes fell into the water and u takeoff from the water like a boss
this makes me want rebuild something like the sundog from the 80s
@Viper_Z3R0 well done! really.
+1just wow. i love the camera bob.
for a non tvc and low parts count aircraft.
+1yours is excellent.
any gyroscope of is yours naturally agile?
i am gonna keep this one for history.
+2maybe i should also make one
looks like i have made some inspirations on paintjobs and nozzles. lol.
@FalcoOne all the best with the school transfer then! good luck!
@FalcoOne still waiting for your entries lol
@GriseoCattus nice but like we also need to broadcast this thing. perhaps many people who were interested earlier were just too busy
wow those silver lines looks extra-hot. i like them
+1@ZeroWithSlashedO this one, no. just a plane with a really heavy spec. each of my planes have their technical challenges and solely for psm with a near 1.4 t/w. but if u think my fictional touch is too much then u can disqualify. think my earlier 3 planes are all reasonably NOT meme. the last one which looks like a gundam, maybe. personally i dont know what meme build is, probably a ufo that looks like a teddy bear and flies/does psm with no wings at all.
not yet close to 12 contestants are we?
@SkyJayTheFirst still waiting for your entry
@GuyFolk agreed, i have somewhat unpleasant experience dealing with stat cards, luckily we can mostly let the physics deal with the final agreement
+1every clipped wing spitfire should get a chance to go into a rolling battle with a fw190
this one is very nice, would also love to see the clip wing go into a rolling battle with the fw190
@Juno thank you!
+1only 298 drag points.
welcome to the darkside lol
I tried removing the rear landing gear and the part holding it and installed a set of wing landing gears near the outer wing tips and the plane no longer turns during take off thank me later
@ZeroWithSlashedO well i just finished a good one i havent uploaded yet, i will probably only upload few days later and ask u so i wont break any rules, and no, they are not even in my profile. the ones that i already uploaded are shitty in comparison. i think i still have 3 spots for new designs?
@ZeroWithSlashedO it's necessary.
@ZeroWithSlashedO No. i will take him head on.
@Bryan5 if its unlisted how do i see it?
+1@Falco7 hey the f-16 is excellent for this. i was going to make one for f-16 if i am not stuck with all the tvc traditions i am having for my designs here. f-16 is a top for my list of standard platform.
nvm just found a super easy way to do it
@ZeroWithSlashedO i remember if i do it again from that redirected post it might as well become a true successor, if that doesnt work i will do something to make it one then. lemme try that tmr first
let me know of an easier way to successor to this event other than going into xml, i cant find a cockpit in my design already and cant sub-assembly my whole plane to yours.
@Mattthepilot12 not really, i know its unstable but if u know the drill its actually good. if u r not going over the aoa limit it behaves like a normal plane. this kind of planes they use fly-by-wire to stabilize in real life so u dont accelerate into the turns the way the plane tend to do. all 3 axis are good imo. if u r using mobile phone to fly this of cos it will be a hard thing to do. this plane needs u to put a lot into the rudder input. i can land this thing on a carrier no problem. just dont expect this to be the many arcade/toyish ace combat planes people make here that flies like a train.
@AnderWorks huh?
@X99STRIKER is that the balancing u found defective? i just updated a new one now it doesnt sway to one side anymore. thanks. if theres anything else u think my plane needs improvement please let me know. i hope u dont use mobile tho, using my planes on mobile can be tough.
@X99STRIKER i think i need to update this one soon. still need to fix something
@ZeroWithSlashedO oh i messed up but i think i can change it i am gonna do it anyways
@OrderlyHippo u like it? theres still some minor things i need to fix with this thing. i probably have 5 other planes i can share at the challenge, 5 different designs.
@OrderlyHippo i am sure once u see my plane u will know i am the best of keyboard warriors lol
@ZeroWithSlashedO fine then i will keep things short. this method is a bit much hacking for my comfort, is the posting of aircraft final candidate or do i get a chance to edit? if i do get to edit after i put my plane here then i will just post it to keep things simple
@ZeroWithSlashedO well, i am gonna post 3 completed planes out of the 30ish that i made last 4 days, probably end up with 5 entries so the 3 are ones that probably a lot of work wont help much with the flying. just to find out i am pretty thrust vectoring/vtol engine heavy since u said tv/vtol welcome, but then u said somewhere in the thread that u hated thrust vectoring bullshit, so should i go or not? lol. well all my designs are pretty good imo. i need to work on the hud tho i think. i just grab them so i can at least fly/test my planes. plane wise quite original. can i post wip and change before the deadline or all posts are final? sometimes i wish people can try them and tell me ideas on improvements. my planes are made with pc i think they are a bit on the sensitive side if u use it on a phone too. i wish i can post earlier so i wont break your rules. at least i dont cheat with codes, code hack wings and without doing it i pretty much already broke the physics and made newton scream already. i just dont want to scream on your deadline when i find out i broke your rules on last minute, btw where is a good place to find a g-limiter of your choice? edit: after looking closer to the rules i just find out u said 1.4 w/t is for before after burning and ok with 2.7 w/ after burning i just read off my (i) all the time and made sure it's under 1.4 duh. how do u check the number with and without afterburning?
what if it's so maneuverable i almost kicked flat spin out of the equation??
btw sometimes stability and super-maneuverability don't mix, i.e. many of them has negative stability (accelerates into a turn that works better when ai assisted aka fly-by-wire)
i have a really good plane wip that does all of the above. i was going to call it the navy's wetdream if the moderators let me do it.
maybe u should try not letting the props get in the way of anything else to see if it helps first?
@SimpleDynamincs this one actually look just like the p51h from war thunder with the same paint scheme
@BarrowAircraft it is especially if u see it in a dogfight. and especially after both planes fell into the water and u takeoff from the water like a boss