Spring strength determines how high or low the car will ride.
Damper will determine the stiffness.
High spring strength and high damper will give great handling, but a harsh ride. Soft suspension will do the opposite.
Simpleplanes will always remain competitive on mobile. Anybody complaining about the "limitations of mobile" needs to go to "highest rated" and hit "all". Check the "made on" for the top creation.
While the claims of 'most realistic' are debatable, this is a very nice looking plane nonetheless.
@cobalT Only the 'Trop' variants had the nose air intake
@Sunnyskies Oh, that might be a problem. I've done a lot of prop fighters/bombers, and I find they lose a lot of steam by 20,000 ft. Something XML modded for lots of power might be your ticket, although it would sacrifice low-altitude realism.
No, I like things how they are now. People are making torpedoes with unique styling and functionality, and I think this is better than a designated torpedo part. The sheer variety, for me at least, outweighs the better functionality a separate part might give. I've spoken about this a while back, you can check that article out if you want to read more on it.
Spring strength determines how high or low the car will ride.
+4Damper will determine the stiffness.
High spring strength and high damper will give great handling, but a harsh ride. Soft suspension will do the opposite.
Simpleplanes will always remain competitive on mobile. Anybody complaining about the "limitations of mobile" needs to go to "highest rated" and hit "all". Check the "made on" for the top creation.
+1Every time I play Warthunder I make a lot of these.
Uh...
C-could you elaborate?
I wonder if a B-18 could be made from this.
Congratulations! I've been driving for a while, you end up owning some pretty cool cars.
Build a twin engine prop fighter/bomber.
From the front, I'm guessing Z32 or Ion Redline. Either way a cool car. Targa tops need to make a comeback.
As a dedicated commie, I hate to say the Spacefire turns better
I figured we were over this...
This is against the rules, please rename the plane and use the tag system.
I love the look of this plane, tapered noses are my weak spot.
@cobalT Oh, I see it now. Eh, it's such a small detail, I don't blame anyone for forgetting it.
@IStoleYourMeme Thanks.
While the claims of 'most realistic' are debatable, this is a very nice looking plane nonetheless.
@cobalT Only the 'Trop' variants had the nose air intake
@Supermini555 Hey!
Scratch that, it's gone now.
fIRST
@RAF1 If imitation is the most sincere form of flattery, this moron loves you.
This isn't yours. It's someone else's, right here
Take this down.
One more thing, the jets you're using don't have enough power to get the frame to speed, bigger, or XML-modded, engines should be used.
The wings look very small, perhaps the maneuverability could be improved with larger wings?
@PlanesOfOld I can't find anything wrong. Nice build.
@CALVIN232 By 'pitch booster', do you mean thrust vectoring?
Air arrow?
@Deloreandude 76.2, actshuallee.
I knew there was a 75 and a 76, but I always figured the 75 was the hi-hello city, guess I'm wrong.
If War Thunder taught me anything, those 105s are junk. Long live the 75 hi-velocity
Well, how do you name your planes? Is there designated letters/numbers for certain features, or is it just one number per model, and different trims?
@Sunnyskies Oh, that might be a problem. I've done a lot of prop fighters/bombers, and I find they lose a lot of steam by 20,000 ft. Something XML modded for lots of power might be your ticket, although it would sacrifice low-altitude realism.
@volt0 You don't need to delete it, and no need to be overly concerned. It was a mistake, but I figured I'd let you know for the future.
One industrial Anti-everything.
I still do it, strap an obscene amount of jets to any creation and watch it break Mach 10 before it disintegrates.
Just a heads-up, advertising creations on the forums is frowned upon.
What do you define as 'high alt'?
I'm not sensitive to things like this, but were the swastikas really necessary?
I like these, a gyroscope and holographic sight option for cockpits would be cool too.
Huh.
I mean, why not, sure but...
Why?
(=ﾟωﾟ)ﾉ
R2D2 OP Gajiggles plz nerf
I'm also impartial to tank controls, I've got a series with them now,
Some suspension components will help it handle better, and stop it from kicking up when braking.
@SuperSanic The tank is out now, I pumped up the weight a bit. Closer to 75,000 lbs now, but still a bit too fast. T-18
I smell Messerschmitt-163
If tank controls are too hard to master, I might make one with steering.
@SkyEyeMCCIX That's exactly it. The bullet spawns a bit outside the barrel, so if you get the prop in that "dead zone", it will keep the prop intact.
If you need, I know how to synchronize wing guns. Not sure if it will work with miniguns, but I do wing guns regularly.
Stalinium tenk for gather sekrit dokuments)))))))
I haven't been playing for too long, but the L-11 gun on the T-34 sucks. Is the F-34 any better?
Why apologize? I leave for months at a time. Not without good reason, but still.
@LatteCoffee55 yeah.
I almost bought one before the Echo.
No, I like things how they are now. People are making torpedoes with unique styling and functionality, and I think this is better than a designated torpedo part. The sheer variety, for me at least, outweighs the better functionality a separate part might give. I've spoken about this a while back, you can check that article out if you want to read more on it.
@Athaya Ah, I see.