I actually used this plane in Korea campaign against north Korean troops in game Wargame Red dragon. Quite good plane, but it is useful only for defeating the air targets (in game strategy I mentioned), but defeating ground vehicles or infantry is practically doesnt makes sense. Also I enjoyed your manual. Nice work
@AircraftExperimental read this wiki article. Yes its in russian, but there is reference to the real documented sources so translate the page. I checked that only russian wikipedia page has lots of sources while english article has nothing. Idk why. Here you also can find info about creating the blueprints and co-work of the big constructors in USSSR. Pretty interesting if you look through this
@KAIST Im terribly sorry for interrupting your conversation, but I ve built recently Object-277. I previously wanted to search if this tank has ever been built here, but I ve only found this comment
@CameronSalazar well, about that. I made something that looks like a tracks, but its absolutely inconvenient, so if I want to make the vehicle to feel comfortable, I have to use mods
зачем ему дополнительная надстройка сзади в виде руля высоты если это монокрыл? Почему бы это не сделать на уровне элеронов? И разве там не должно быть вертикального хвоста? Больно уж напоминает F-117
@19YaroslavAleksandrov33 если бы взял бы ты алюминиевые, то вес составит 169 кг за 250 мм ширины и 1000 мм длины, где чугун при таких же показателях будет весить 425 кг (причем алюминий слабее по плотности в 3 раза чугуна). Вот и считай, либо у твоего танка толстенная броня из слабой стали, которая хоть как-то своим весом устоит на не самой сильной ходовой (я напомню, у мауса 12 катков по каждую сторону, а у тебя как у Т-54), либо это будет просто неподвижный дот.
@19YaroslavAleksandrov33 ну даже если и так, танк то сдвинется с такими то показателями в реальной жизни? Сам порше кое как придумал маус и тот кое как ехал, а тут...
@dabestsock thats true, but the practical usage of this technology can be realised by making copy of the abrams turret and put it on IFV... so it only matters on the decision of the constructors if they decide to build this
I actually used this plane in Korea campaign against north Korean troops in game Wargame Red dragon. Quite good plane, but it is useful only for defeating the air targets (in game strategy I mentioned), but defeating ground vehicles or infantry is practically doesnt makes sense. Also I enjoyed your manual. Nice work
+1@AircraftExperimental read this wiki article. Yes its in russian, but there is reference to the real documented sources so translate the page. I checked that only russian wikipedia page has lots of sources while english article has nothing. Idk why. Here you also can find info about creating the blueprints and co-work of the big constructors in USSSR. Pretty interesting if you look through this
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/КВ-5
НАКАНЕЦЬТА Байдiн дал потужнi самольот Ф-16
@Taboritsky well, I'll try
@Onat67 i think you miscalculated
8+8+7+8+8+10+10 is 59
@Taboritsky only with track mod
Yeeeeeh Im gold now
Are the chinese wheeled tanks count as the soviet? Like Pl02?
+300 social credits
+1I`ve built it go here
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/NMFO91/SU-25
@KPLBall well, if this vehicle can destroy something so this is the real tank
M1 Abrams destroying a T-55 is like a violating children
@Onat67 nice 😎
@KPLBall okay, but how it makes this vehicle a tank? The tank must have at least a gun
@KPLBall it looks good overall, but I think you need more details
@Randomplayer
@Randomplayer but its already done
@Randomplayer t for what?
@KPLBall well, I actually tried to do previous tank without mods but I have no idea how to turn the hull properly
@KAIST for what?
@KAIST Im terribly sorry for interrupting your conversation, but I ve built recently Object-277. I previously wanted to search if this tank has ever been built here, but I ve only found this comment
@Pepopi если б я еще знал АК-130 что это
@Pepopi эт пздц
@Pepopi это база 🤙
@Graingy actually my friend from military center by the institute said that the turret has a flat surface near the lamp, so I got a bit confused
@TheMouse thx
where did you take the background?
well, it looks actually good but the tracks are... amount is not enough. It must be more than 5 and smaller
+1@Graingy thx, I`ll tell her to visit doc
+1@CameronSalazar well, about that. I made something that looks like a tracks, but its absolutely inconvenient, so if I want to make the vehicle to feel comfortable, I have to use mods
@SotonaUA ну это понятно, просто логичнее было бы сделать монокрыл с таким видом фюзеляжа
зачем ему дополнительная надстройка сзади в виде руля высоты если это монокрыл? Почему бы это не сделать на уровне элеронов? И разве там не должно быть вертикального хвоста? Больно уж напоминает F-117
so smooth but if I download this plane my PC go bruhh
Yeah, M22 definitely deservs a 152mm gun in it
@Eggplant steam is available, but I cant purchase
T-72 or T-55, maybe MiG-15 if simple planes 2 will be available in Russia
+1@upperflat yoooooo why is it invisible?
Bu... where it's hull? Its chassis just flow?
-> 120 mm gun
-> Technologies from Russia
Am I right that Russia in 1980-s had already designed and used abrams canon on their tanks?
@Trainzo thx
@19YaroslavAleksandrov33 если бы взял бы ты алюминиевые, то вес составит 169 кг за 250 мм ширины и 1000 мм длины, где чугун при таких же показателях будет весить 425 кг (причем алюминий слабее по плотности в 3 раза чугуна). Вот и считай, либо у твоего танка толстенная броня из слабой стали, которая хоть как-то своим весом устоит на не самой сильной ходовой (я напомню, у мауса 12 катков по каждую сторону, а у тебя как у Т-54), либо это будет просто неподвижный дот.
И Я УЖЕ НЕ ГОВОРЮ ОБ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИХ ТРАТАХ
@19YaroslavAleksandrov33 ну даже если и так, танк то сдвинется с такими то показателями в реальной жизни? Сам порше кое как придумал маус и тот кое как ехал, а тут...
I just can't believe that it is 900mm in the front, it doesn't even looks like a 100mm
@Rob119WithA105mmHowitzer yo 🤯
you re going to brazil 💀
+1nice
What will you say if your ozelot meet my IFV Abrams?
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/p6dVyK/Abrams-82-IFV
@dabestsock thats true, but the practical usage of this technology can be realised by making copy of the abrams turret and put it on IFV... so it only matters on the decision of the constructors if they decide to build this
+1@LunarEclipseSP because I can 😎
+1Z? Goyda?
+1