@Johnnyynf I just checked your engine design it's very different to how my car works, i mine uses one singular Control base to rotate the entire crank shaft with pistons hanging off a shocks to keep it linear in the up and down motion, i developed the spinning crank from custom Rim code using control bases for those, Further more my motor design predates your control based one by 7 months
so please don't come to my page and tell me i was influenced by your work when that's just not true respectfully of course
@ScrewedAccount
1. Canada was Mercury's primary buyer of those cars
2. It is based on the 69 300 series mustang platform
3. Ford created mercury as a cheaper alternative to the mustang so yes it would have competed with the mustang.
4. Mercury is was established by ford as a brand for economic differences
5. Mercury's main factory was in Canada.
6.Ford loved to make regional based companies (look up what holden is sometime)
1-1 copying from somebody is even more of a reason to credit so out right denying makes you look 10 fold worse then just saying yeah i forgot, credit and move on, instead USA mustang you decided to make forum post calling me a bitch and trying to find me stealing builds
@YarisSedan It's ironic because even WCAC is telling this guy to credit even tho Writers crusade did basically the same thing although I'll give him credit he never 1-1 copied from me
i could build you a modular race chassis that's low parts and easy to apply to bodys and works realistically, or just something simple you could learn from
@ShirasagiSora if they do the rear tires loose traction and then you spinout, when you're that low to the ground, leverage works against you and lifts tires if too much side ways force is applied
The reason sedans and older cars do is because they have normal ride height and can afford to have travel to roll which helps performance when you go taller, the lower you go, the stiffer the suspension
also i know you don't know what you're talking about because any amount of roll is bad for Race cars and they have some of the most stiffest suspension in the world so your car body rolling like it is like some 60s high horsepower sedan is incredibly unrealistic
Steering this car is pretty laughable, it's like it has no resistance turning, you could make a full right turn with the wheels at 300 KPH which isn't possible for you to turn the wheels at that speed, also show me any GT car that rolls that much like a Sedan
@ShirasagiSora what are you talking about rolling? i thought we talking about looks here, your tire isn't even connected to the shock, or anything really. it just sits there magically connected to it
@Johnnyynf I just checked your engine design it's very different to how my car works, i mine uses one singular Control base to rotate the entire crank shaft with pistons hanging off a shocks to keep it linear in the up and down motion, i developed the spinning crank from custom Rim code using control bases for those, Further more my motor design predates your control based one by 7 months
so please don't come to my page and tell me i was influenced by your work when that's just not true respectfully of course
+2@Johnnyynf that's cool i had no idea who you were before this post
+3@Johnnyynf I have never once downloading anything from you, so you can keep Imagining in your head
+4@WinsWings yeah it's handy sometimes
+1@CKKI what does that mean?
@ComradeSandman wdym?
@Dest20345 ah so it's probably 69-70
@Dest20345 is it a town car or an Elimnator package? Yours I mean
@Dest20345 how close did I get mine you'd think? I've only driven the 68 which is a little different from this
@WinsWings I have a decent background knowledge of cars so I find these easier to make then planes
+1@Dest20345 nice, same year?
@WinsWings Thanks, i had such a great time modeling this, i tried to make it as close to the real car as possible
+1@YarisSedan a taxi cab wouldnt be too bad
+1@ScrewedAccount
+11. Canada was Mercury's primary buyer of those cars
2. It is based on the 69 300 series mustang platform
3. Ford created mercury as a cheaper alternative to the mustang so yes it would have competed with the mustang.
4. Mercury is was established by ford as a brand for economic differences
5. Mercury's main factory was in Canada.
6.Ford loved to make regional based companies (look up what holden is sometime)
@MobileBuilder21 thank you
@Nerfaddict i don't recall seeing sorry because i have poor vision when reading screens so i might have missed it when copying the names down
Thanks @EternalDarkness
@TheGliderGuy it's my countries car, I had to put a case of authentic Canadian beer in it as a parting gift
+1@TheGliderGuy there's a case of Molson beer in the trunk too
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Let me know how she handles
@RobertsAeronautics
@TheNewSPplayer @TheGliderGuy @Talon7192
@Pnut @Boeing727200F @overlord5453
@Apollo018362 Yes
@CrestelAeronautics @Marulk @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
@ImAcarperson @SPsidearm @TwoTurboMan
@F8boa @RobertsAeronautics @YarisSedan
+1@Rob119WithA105mmHowitzer @BYardley @PrussianAirlines
+1@MobileBuilder21 @IDK0 @YourLocalJetNut330
Hey man hows the iron giant treating you?
@YarisSedan This is pretty interesting
this car and this car are pretty close
2 months is also a pretty long time
1-1 copying from somebody is even more of a reason to credit so out right denying makes you look 10 fold worse then just saying yeah i forgot, credit and move on, instead USA mustang you decided to make forum post calling me a bitch and trying to find me stealing builds
+1@YarisSedan It's ironic because even WCAC is telling this guy to credit even tho Writers crusade did basically the same thing although I'll give him credit he never 1-1 copied from me
+1oh so we're deleting comments now? you're so pathetic like WCAC, just admit you forgot to credit Kernels
so ignoring the fenders, why didn't credit Dussts for the 1969 charger front end huh?
you can't tell me it isn't from the potato charger
@USAMustang Atleast i made it by myself
The Tomcat over pitches too much
@Yarissedan, you literally could have looked here first before asking me for non sense
I'll give you an unlisted tomorrow, i'll just use the wheel base of this as reference
@ShirasagiSora yeah
i could build you a modular race chassis that's low parts and easy to apply to bodys and works realistically, or just something simple you could learn from
+1it's why most Go Karts have zero suspension
@ShirasagiSora if they do the rear tires loose traction and then you spinout, when you're that low to the ground, leverage works against you and lifts tires if too much side ways force is applied
The reason sedans and older cars do is because they have normal ride height and can afford to have travel to roll which helps performance when you go taller, the lower you go, the stiffer the suspension
@ShirasagiSora Incredibly so. it's got more bounce then my 69 cougar and i'm using old leafs in the rear
@ShirasagiSora The performance isn't even there, it's really really arcadey
also i know you don't know what you're talking about because any amount of roll is bad for Race cars and they have some of the most stiffest suspension in the world so your car body rolling like it is like some 60s high horsepower sedan is incredibly unrealistic
Steering this car is pretty laughable, it's like it has no resistance turning, you could make a full right turn with the wheels at 300 KPH which isn't possible for you to turn the wheels at that speed, also show me any GT car that rolls that much like a Sedan
@ShirasagiSora what are you talking about rolling? i thought we talking about looks here, your tire isn't even connected to the shock, or anything really. it just sits there magically connected to it
@ShirasagiSora i see no difference, you just increased shock strength by 20% in the front
is this car you're talking about?