@Hyattorama Absolutely. It still flies like trash compared to a 3+ channel aircraft though. Modern receivers and servos kinda make this style redundant but it's still fun to try it out anyway
Awesome! I’ve gotten so sick of people complaining about how floppy and rolly rockcrawlers are. Finally some people who want off-roaders not an F1 @Hyattorama @GenericWhiteGuy
Featuring just means that a dev (or mod maybe, I dunno) really likes that creation and thinks it needs more attention. Nothing to do with how many upvotes it has @MasterShi
I count 7-10 FPS as unplayable but you are still right. It kind of works on lowest settings. My point however was that mid-range devices can’t do very much at 40fps and high physics @Rodrigo110
My PC with 8GB RAM, GTX1060 3GB, 2.7GHz dual core (8 years old lol) crashes with 2500 parts. Give me an example of a 2500 part creation you can run with 2GB RAM. My IPad Air 1 barely manages 200 parts on high settings. @Rodrigo110
@Rodrigo110 I specified mid-range and mid-age. Not everyone can afford high-end devices. Besides, I very much doubt many mobile devices can run a 1000 part build on high physics at 40+ fps
For it to be truly mobile friendly (40fps and higher on high physics) you’ll have to give it stock landing gear, delete minor aesthetic details, delete Merlin engine and use simple circular fuselages instead of angled mini pieces. Even then it will run slow on most mid-age or mid-performance devices but it would look terrible. In short: don’t bother making it mobile friendly, just make the best stuff you can @RamboJutter
I would love an electric composite plane this size with a parachute. I'd prefer something with better flight characteristics though (canard or forward-swept wing)
Or just get a good plane and learn to fly. The last time I lost against the convoy was when I tried to gun them down with 2 stock machine guns while flying at mach 2 though the canyon
If you're not enjoying the game anymore, leave. You'll probably come back when you think of new building techniques or cool creations. That's what I did
Fitting exactly within the max part count ;)
It's pretty good but it doesn't look very smooth and is very impractical. It's a cool novelty i guess
Done :D
@Minecraftpoweer
@Jengstrom
@InternationalAircraftCompany
@Mercyaircraftcorporation
@mikoyanster
@Razor3278
@Chancey21
@Planedude
@destroyerP
@Windy2325 That was fast lol
Excellent part count for the level of detail!
Will do @Chancey21
I’m glad you think so! @destroyerP
THANK YOU. I’ve been trying to get that added for two years now lol @EternalDarkness
Off-road tag pllleeeeeaaaase
+4I made an unmanned, turbofan powered quadcopter at 303 parts. I’ll upload soon :)
I’ve got quite a few 4-6 channel foam aircraft (3D, sport and combat) and a couple of quads :) man I love RC @Hyattorama
+1@GenrichTitov Nice
@Hyattorama I'll try to remember. I've just got to finish 2 detailed aircraft before then though
+1@Hyattorama Absolutely. It still flies like trash compared to a 3+ channel aircraft though. Modern receivers and servos kinda make this style redundant but it's still fun to try it out anyway
+1Did you export the 3D file of it and then change the textures in another program? It looks pretty good!
+1@GenericWhiteGuy Yes it is. Most people on this site don't realise that
+2@flugzeug If you use nudging and scaling properly, you could make an invisible detacher system but it would be very, very fiddly.
No double wishbone D:
Awesome! I’ve gotten so sick of people complaining about how floppy and rolly rockcrawlers are. Finally some people who want off-roaders not an F1 @Hyattorama @GenericWhiteGuy
+2@GenericWhiteGuy @Hyattorama Thanks! Do you think I should continue making stuff like this? Refined and with more detail of course
+2@GenericWhiteGuy You're very welcome. I love this thing
+1Can't be done without mods or extra parts like detachers as stated below
@mikoyanster attack helicopter challenge
@Brields95 You might be able to remap the MMB to a combination of keys
Try raising the part health to 10000 then it will be armoured and less likely to fall apart in mid-air
+2I was joking lol. Practical reactive armour is impossible in SP at this stage @Minecraftpoweer
But how functional is the reactive armour?
You can’t click the scroll wheel down? @Brields95
@Rodrigo110 when I say it crashes at 2500 parts, it's actually on high physics. I refuse to put physics down lol
Good to know @Irobert55
Featuring just means that a dev (or mod maybe, I dunno) really likes that creation and thinks it needs more attention. Nothing to do with how many upvotes it has @MasterShi
I count 7-10 FPS as unplayable but you are still right. It kind of works on lowest settings. My point however was that mid-range devices can’t do very much at 40fps and high physics @Rodrigo110
Is SP different between mobile and PC? I thought it was just maywar that was different @Rodrigo110
That’s immediately what I thought lol @RamboJutter
+1My PC with 8GB RAM, GTX1060 3GB, 2.7GHz dual core (8 years old lol) crashes with 2500 parts. Give me an example of a 2500 part creation you can run with 2GB RAM. My IPad Air 1 barely manages 200 parts on high settings. @Rodrigo110
No... you said it would have downgraded graphics. I said it would be the same but you could have options. @Rodrigo110
@Rodrigo110 I specified mid-range and mid-age. Not everyone can afford high-end devices. Besides, I very much doubt many mobile devices can run a 1000 part build on high physics at 40+ fps
Nope. Probably the same as SP where you will have options for settings. @Rodrigo110
For it to be truly mobile friendly (40fps and higher on high physics) you’ll have to give it stock landing gear, delete minor aesthetic details, delete Merlin engine and use simple circular fuselages instead of angled mini pieces. Even then it will run slow on most mid-age or mid-performance devices but it would look terrible. In short: don’t bother making it mobile friendly, just make the best stuff you can @RamboJutter
+1It looks like a rocket-propelled-grenade from a handheld launcher
@fantastekgamer Did you find this in the game files?
Does throttle input effect volume? If so, 10x power and 0.1x max input @Hyattorama
+1Yes. Buy me a real one. JK, no I’m not. Just voicing opinions lol @Hyattorama
+1I would love an electric composite plane this size with a parachute. I'd prefer something with better flight characteristics though (canard or forward-swept wing)
@fishydude243
Or just get a good plane and learn to fly. The last time I lost against the convoy was when I tried to gun them down with 2 stock machine guns while flying at mach 2 though the canyon
If you're not enjoying the game anymore, leave. You'll probably come back when you think of new building techniques or cool creations. That's what I did