Nice job! Controls realisticly, but it's pretty underpowered, so I'd use the turboprop, and it pitches downward without flaps so maybe tweak the wings. Other than that, good job!
Nice job! Maybe next time increase the wing-to-body ratio for better realism.
Handy trick: if you have multiple wing parts instead of one they will stick to the fuselage blocks.
Nice job! Maybe next time increase the wing-to-body ratio for better realism.
Handy trick: if you have multiple wing parts instead of one they will stick to the fuselage blocks.
@WNP78 80kph isn't much if you're going 200kph. I've done 3 years of research on LTA flight especially in winds. With the right fuselage shape, and auxiliary thrusters, a modern airship can operate in relatively high winds. Also, my designs are very different from a conventional airship, and are much heavier.
How does this work
Ps. Amazing job!
Aerostat police here,
use the airship tag please
Probably your best looking boat. Jood gob
+3@LusK EYYYYY! U TOO!!!!!
Love it! Flies well at low and high speeds!
@getorge did you change your gravatar specifically for this comment?
70,000 mph in space
+1Hard to turn
Boeing
Hey, could I get a regular BFE 150 XML modded to produce zero thrust?
@BoeyingOfficial oh, ok
@BoeyingOfficial wait wut?
@Feanor it's spelled
D R O O P S N O O T
@InternationalAircraftCompany I was previously unaware that the wild icebergs had language
+1Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
Unsinkable?
*iceberg plans in shadow
+2@DerekSP here you go!
@Bman01 I did that out of laziness. It's British now I guess
Hope you like it! Look foreword to stuff from you!
Nice job! Controls realisticly, but it's pretty underpowered, so I'd use the turboprop, and it pitches downward without flaps so maybe tweak the wings. Other than that, good job!
+3took me ages to figure out
@BRC21yt like this
[text] (link)
But without the space in between
no spaces in between
@BRC21yt try that
Like this [clickable link] (https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/ejfoWl/Curtis-P-40-Warhawk)
@BRC21yt you need the brackets with something in it to work
Oh, you don't need to put the !
Hey, did you know that if you say ! And then [ text in here ] and then (put the link in brackets) you can make a !clickable link
You would probably start a fire?
+1@CeeToTheZee oh?
@DepressedTortoise dude you're following yourself
+1@DepressedTortoise cats can actually transmit diseases to belugas. Ur cat is like a whales rat
@RodWan I'll make an unlisted post and tag you
Ooooooh
jurassic park theme plays on harmonica
+2Still the best
@XjayIndustrys
'Masing
Hey, I need some xml help with an airship I'm building, it's fairly easy
Bean flavoured tic tacs
+2@EternalDarkness I knew it, u deserve it
Nice job! Maybe next time increase the wing-to-body ratio for better realism.
+1Handy trick: if you have multiple wing parts instead of one they will stick to the fuselage blocks.
Nice job! Maybe next time increase the wing-to-body ratio for better realism.
Handy trick: if you have multiple wing parts instead of one they will stick to the fuselage blocks.
@WNP78 no, it would have similar dimensions to the Hindenburg. To decrease drag it would have "shark skin" and it would be powered by propfan engines.
@WNP78 what do you mean really long?
@WNP78 80kph isn't much if you're going 200kph. I've done 3 years of research on LTA flight especially in winds. With the right fuselage shape, and auxiliary thrusters, a modern airship can operate in relatively high winds. Also, my designs are very different from a conventional airship, and are much heavier.
@Tovarishch the area where the fuselage sweeps up, there's a definite line where that happens.
Amazing!!!! I would recommend smoothing out the back though
Nice! Love it so far!
Sweet game!
The anti-gravity wells means that an air buoyancy slider can be made