@ForeverPie
the argument caught my attention first i didn't get a chance to rate this creation
give me some time
JK it's awesome
and i don't think it's really necessary to put 1:1 in the description when you can write 100% historically exact
again JK
usually users (like me) rate replicas by it's shape first,
by it's level of details second, by it's agility and features third,
and only then by measurements for last
@ForeverPie it doesn't matter if he can or he can't
for isntance football critics.
some of them can't even play football
but they may KNOW about football more than a
player
and about the length @cobalT
it really doesn't matter if it's off by some centimeters
you should critique not by measurements only, but by the ratio of crucial parts (for planes - wings) to the main body (hull)
@Kevinairlines i don't actually know... i've lost a lot of progress on my f104 due to a system recovery
and that kinda demotivated me and whenever i try to work on it i become lazy
i think i'll upload some of my creations before the big project
if something resized wobbles on a rotator/piston/shock etc.
that must mean that you have mass-scaled it
@arcues
just uncheck mass scale when working with those kind of parts
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation i didn't tell them to come here
they are independent enough to visit any post and comment anything they like i only answer for myself
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
stalking... is not the word that you are looking for
i'm sure you meant communicating
because that is what i did when i answered
to your comment
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
define stalking
i was scrolling through your profile as i do on every other user
btw this post was the only thing that caught my attention
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
lol ok, now that is what you think you know about fine tuner
i'm just gonna tag @HellFireKoder
eventually he will explain it to you someday
@cobalT @ForeverPie
it's useless to intervene you guys
i think you will argue to eternity
only a mod/dev can make ONE of you stop
@cobalT stop being dank
@ForeverPie
the argument caught my attention first i didn't get a chance to rate this creation
give me some time
JK it's awesome
and i don't think it's really necessary to put 1:1 in the description when you can write 100% historically exact
again JK
usually users (like me) rate replicas by it's shape first,
by it's level of details second, by it's agility and features third,
and only then by measurements for last
@ForeverPie it's better if you don't continue
@cobalT cobs... cobs... cobsy boy
don't argue with sus
@ForeverPie it doesn't matter if he can or he can't
for isntance football critics.
some of them can't even play football
but they may KNOW about football more than a
player
and about the length @cobalT
it really doesn't matter if it's off by some centimeters
you should critique not by measurements only, but by the ratio of crucial parts (for planes - wings) to the main body (hull)
this Typhoon looks amazing
@MechWARRIOR57 nah i didn't XD
@MechWARRIOR57 what do you mean?
@AwesomeDesign717 tomato sauce
@Waemoth
Reverse molecular atomic genetic DNA testing has confirmed the Flakpanzer Coelian to be 100% historically exact
@Kevinairlines i don't actually know... i've lost a lot of progress on my f104 due to a system recovery
and that kinda demotivated me and whenever i try to work on it i become lazy
i think i'll upload some of my creations before the big project
@Kevinairlines ok
HERCULEEEEEEEEEES!!!!
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
i dont know
but HF pulls
BAN pranks a lot on me
@alongnamethatishardtorememberbecauseitsreallyunnecessarilylong
nah you are not the first one to experience the almighty FT ban
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
"not a rumor"?
@SpiritusRaptor
1:1
best f-35 to date
so tru
@Daviwavy i can't help myself
how am i gonna help you XD
interesting model
looks like one of my concepts for helis
@Pilotluigi
@SimpleFlow
RIP
@EternalDarkness fishpaste
@Daviwavy you need to be platinum
if something resized wobbles on a rotator/piston/shock etc.
that must mean that you have mass-scaled it
@arcues
just uncheck mass scale when working with those kind of parts
Is it histerically exactly by -1/12%
?????
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
i'm just gonna stop
@Johndfg jahne boi pls don't mak him mad
this is BAE AS FLINT
gr7 job
historically exact XD
Lolumad?
@Shrekbopcity shrekbop me bb
@Cedy117 please ban everyone who didn't eat wax
including devs
and countless others....
lol it's a joke pls dont ban suss
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation ok don't be mad please
i didn't want to trigger you
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation nevermind
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation i didn't tell them to come here
they are independent enough to visit any post and comment anything they like i only answer for myself
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
fine if you dont want to define stalking
I'll ask google for it....
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
stalking... is not the word that you are looking for
i'm sure you meant communicating
because that is what i did when i answered
to your comment
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
so "not a rumor"?
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
define stalking
i was scrolling through your profile as i do on every other user
btw this post was the only thing that caught my attention
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation do you have Fine Tuner? or not?
lol
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
lol ok, now that is what you think you know about fine tuner
i'm just gonna tag @HellFireKoder
eventually he will explain it to you someday
at least 20.01% pre-historically 1-01
it is truly amazing
@Gestour
@EternalDarkness omg
better than su25 confirmed XD
@Stingray thanks again
@Stingray XD thanks
@Filip123 thanks
@AeroEngineering
O _ o
@Johndfg i know