Looks: 7/10 because it has a nice paint job and shape
Flight: 7/10 because it flies pretty straight, but stutters a bit under heavy turning
Extra details: 0/5 because it had no extra details
Total score: 15/25 because it had a nice shape and decent flight, but lacks extra details
1 extra point was added because you didn’t use heavy xml and it would be unfair to judge someone who used heavy xml with someone that used no xml (I think)
Looks: 7/10 because it has a nice shape and paint scheme that distracts From the fact that it isn’t using any fuselages
Flight: 9/10 because it maneuvers very well and flies very straight, but angles just the littlest bit down
Extra details: 1/5 because it has some little lights that add to the look
1 extra point was added because It is made of purely normal blocks and it would be hard to compete with everybody and their fancy xml heavy planes if I judged them the same
Total score: 18/25 because it flies great and has a very nice paint job
Looks: 9/10 because it has a really nice shape that makes me convinced you used fuselages, but the front of the plane is a bit wonky
Flight: 6/10 because in all honesty, it doesn’t fly the best. It heavily angles down, stutters, and maneuvers really slowly.
Extra details: 3/5 because it has a few details on the wings, but nothing too insane.
1 extra point was added because it has a really nice shape and is a very cool build in general
Total score: 19/25 because it is a very sleek looking build That has a few cool details. Quite a few points were lost in the flight category because it isn’t very maneuverable and heavily angles down
Flight: 8/10 because it flies pretty great but angles down and isn’t the most maneuverable possible
Looks: 9/10 because it has insane details and a very nice shape
Extra details: 5/5 hands down because you have everything from custom seats to realistically shaped wings to working dials. Total: 22/25 because I couldn’t make something this good WITH fuselages, and that’s why I’m scoring you this good. The main way points were lost is because it angles down in flight but great job!
Yeah I used to have the 1:1 but then I sold it. I don’t know why I did, because it was pretty darn good. Other good cars I would suggest are the 918 and the centenario @KnightOfRen
Well you got 3rd so good job! @asteroidbook345
You won, hands down. Great job!
+1Look at the pinned comment @FuzzyAircraftProductions
Yes @FuzzyAircraftProductions
Looks: 7/10 because it has a nice paint job and shape
+1Flight: 7/10 because it flies pretty straight, but stutters a bit under heavy turning
Extra details: 0/5 because it had no extra details
Total score: 15/25 because it had a nice shape and decent flight, but lacks extra details
1 extra point was added because you didn’t use heavy xml and it would be unfair to judge someone who used heavy xml with someone that used no xml (I think)
Looks: 7/10 because it has a nice shape and paint scheme that distracts From the fact that it isn’t using any fuselages
+1Flight: 9/10 because it maneuvers very well and flies very straight, but angles just the littlest bit down
Extra details: 1/5 because it has some little lights that add to the look
1 extra point was added because It is made of purely normal blocks and it would be hard to compete with everybody and their fancy xml heavy planes if I judged them the same
Total score: 18/25 because it flies great and has a very nice paint job
Looks: 9/10 because it has a really nice shape that makes me convinced you used fuselages, but the front of the plane is a bit wonky
Flight: 6/10 because in all honesty, it doesn’t fly the best. It heavily angles down, stutters, and maneuvers really slowly.
Extra details: 3/5 because it has a few details on the wings, but nothing too insane.
1 extra point was added because it has a really nice shape and is a very cool build in general
Total score: 19/25 because it is a very sleek looking build That has a few cool details. Quite a few points were lost in the flight category because it isn’t very maneuverable and heavily angles down
Flight: 8/10 because it flies pretty great but angles down and isn’t the most maneuverable possible
+1Looks: 9/10 because it has insane details and a very nice shape
Extra details: 5/5 hands down because you have everything from custom seats to realistically shaped wings to working dials. Total: 22/25 because I couldn’t make something this good WITH fuselages, and that’s why I’m scoring you this good. The main way points were lost is because it angles down in flight but great job!
This is fine @SimpleJets
this is the link
Could you @ eternal darkness and tell him to make it a successor
THE TIME IS UP! I will be accepting entries for the next day or so, but it’s a bit late to start on it
Ask eternal darkness to make it a successor. I will judge it even if it isn’t a successor because you are having problems @SimpleJets
MUAHAHA I HAVE THE ORIGINAL ONE YOU UPLOADED THEN DELETED
Noooooooo! @Planeacceleration
@Planeacceleration sure why not
I like it!
Yes. I know. @Numbers
You see, I read that as coronavirus for some reason
Just because I’m gold doesn’t mean that I have to take everything seriously and not have any fun with experimenting @SFNox
Oh I’ve experienced that @Aeromen
there ya go my dude
I gotchu
+1Wow @Mage2IsTriggered
Yey. Also congrats on 10k. Is that recent? @Mage2IsTriggered
I tried it, and it adds no boost in performance @asteroidbook345
It does. Should I judge it with an extra inlet on it tho? @asteroidbook345
So it says that it’s not getting enough air
there you go
Sweet. At least I did decently! @Diloph
The thing is, it’s gonna get upvotes and I don’t wanna abuse the point system by re uploading it. So can I just use a link? @Stupidman
Can I use a pre uploaded build that I already made?
@EternalDarkness could you make this a successor of Diloph’s Tiny Plane challenge?
...sooo not to be nit picky but the pistons are xml modded to have a landing gear Input and you said that wasn’t allowed @Diloph @AWESOMENESS360
Sweet! @AirFrontierIncorporation
+1Sure. You have until July 13th tho @AirFrontierIncorporation
+2Yes. Just anything that’s not fuselage related @asteroidbook345
@GiuliMBorgesYT yes i know. i rated these then i realized how many successors i had to rate, then decided to rate them when the challenge ends
+1I don’t listen to beggars
There you go. It’s a beautiful “plane” @DrEthel
There’s literally a game called SimpleRockets @DrEthel
Wrong game my dude. Nothing wrong with that, though
This is a great build! I’m excited to grade this!
Yeah I used to have the 1:1 but then I sold it. I don’t know why I did, because it was pretty darn good. Other good cars I would suggest are the 918 and the centenario @KnightOfRen
Oh nvm I forgot about that comment I made @KnightOfRen
How’d you know I had it? It’s really light so It corners great and it goes like 250 so it’s one of the best cars in the game@KnightOfRen
You mean: I hope so! @DemonSniper8
Idk @Panthers4741
Gah @Panthers4741
Nah. You’re not there yet. I’ll help!
+1